العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026

Yoane Wissa

Newcastle
Penalty-box poacher ST
2.5 shots/90 · 0.16 xG per shot — shoots from high-value spots · 0.39 xG/90
Capability Analysis
Finishing15%vs 18 strikers
"Does he finish better than the quality of chance he gets?"
Goals above expected-4.12goals6%
Placement quality vs xG-1.51index33%
Shots on target13.06%
Box Threat54%vs 18 strikers
"Is he a genuine goal threat by shot volume and quality?"
xG /900.43xG78%
Shots /902.1633%
xGOT /900.32xGOT50%
Ball-Carrying53%vs 18 strikers
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /901.9667%
Carry distance /9049.69m61%
Successful take-ons /900.6356%
Take-on success29.03%28%
Aerial Threat0%vs 18 strikers
"Is he a genuine aerial outlet -- can he win headers, not just occupy space?"
Aerial duels won /900.00%
Aerial win rate: 0.0%
strikertransition runnerbox threatfinishing
656
minutes
8 apps
1
goals
2.81 xG
2.8
xG
18 shots
18
shots
0.16 xG/shot
2
box entries
0.27/90
1
key passes
0.14/90
19
dribbles
42% won
71%
pass completion
135 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

LINK
lay-off and combine
1 key passes · 71% completion · 135× in 8/8 matches
↓
FINISH
shoot from central zones
2.81 xG · 18× in 6/8 matches
Signature: Link → Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: receive / move — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn); convert — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
17
passes / match
2.4
dribbles / match
4–26
pass range (matches)
1–4
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (4 at the low end, 26 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

10

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

38 tracked carries (5.2/90, 19 progressive, 488m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

8%13%13%3%5%3%21%8%5%3%16%3%
progressivelateral/short% of his 38 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 12m, longest 34m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
6Outside → Inside
26Inside → Inside
4Outside → Outside
2Inside → Outside
First (14)Second (13)Third (11)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Does he drop to link or stay central? Touches by channel. Season rate: 2.61 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 58%
OUTSIDE 42%
Dribble location — 11 inside · 8 outside
Right Wing
7 · 37%
Right Half-Space
2 · 11%
Central
6 · 32%
Left Half-Space
3 · 16%
Left Wing
1 · 5%
Vision AI His touches are central and high — a penalty-box striker.
05

How does he create chances?

1 key passes (0.14/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
100%
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (1)from the right (0)of 1 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
02

Can he finish?

18 shots · 2.81 xG · 1 goals (-1.81 vs xG). Mostly right-footed. Circle size = xG.

shots  18
on target  8
goals  1
xG  2.81
xG on target  1.91
xG / shot  0.156
Where he shoots from — click an area of the box
07

Where does he become vulnerable?

50 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

21
attacking third (cheap)
26
middle third
3
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 42% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.75 danger-index/90 · 0.255 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
08

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Yoane Wissa gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
23%
Primary
Central, Middle third
12%
Secondary
Right Half-Space, Middle third
11%
Third
Right Half-Space, Attacking third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
09

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Yoane Wissa actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
161543915242116131415187
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%1%9%10%10%4%4%11%18%12%1%4%10%2%1%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

1Key pass
3Cross
3Cutback
5Progressive
2Long ball
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
8Outside → Inside
54Inside → Inside
14Outside → Outside
20Inside → Outside
By direction
50Forward
35Backward
50Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the left hs in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the final third: 50% of his 16 touches there are lost (8 times).
—2 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—3 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—0 touches · too few33%3/9 lost35%6/17 lost19%7/36 lost43%6/14 lost33%3/9 lost30%3/10 lost50%8/16 lost25%2/8 lost—7 touches · too few—1 touch · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
06

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 38 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he carries through central areas (68%). He carries from outside into the middle 6 times and out toward the touchline 2 — a genuine inside forward who cuts in with the ball.
04

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
1 · 3%
Progressive / key pass
2 · 5%
Simple pass
22 · 58%
No clean link
13 · 34%
Of 38 carries, 3% flow straight into a shot of his own, 5% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 34% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
12

Crosses & Cutbacks

3 crosses (0.41/90, 1 completed) and 3 cutbacks (0.41/90, 1 completed) — two separate wide-delivery patterns into the box, each its own map with a completed/failed filter. Neither is a tagged event, so both are inferred from pass geometry — the intended end point of a failed attempt is still real data (an interception doesn’t erase where the ball was aimed): a cross is a pass aimed into the box starting from a wide channel; a cutback starts almost on the byline but is squared back rather than driven forward, aimed centrally around the box. The completed-cross count was checked against this platform’s own real match-level cross totals and lands within about 1 cross of the true count.

Crosses — close-up on the final third
Cutbacks — close-up on the final third
completedfailed (dashed)close-up on the box — attacking ↑ toward goal
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

14

How & where does he defend?

109 defensive actions across the season (15.0/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
7
tackles · 0% won
0
interceptions · 0.0/90
20
recoveries · 2.7/90
9
clearances · 1.2/90
11
blocks
51
avg action height
26
won high (att 3rd)
56
middle third
27
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 27 proactive ball-wins (3.7/90), tackle success 0%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

56
attacking-half actions · 7.68/90
13

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Yoane Wissa keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 3.3, 2m)
0.43
1.6
0.78
33%
Mid press (PPDA 3.9, 2m)
0.35
0.5
0.00
50%
Low press (PPDA 5.4, 4m)
0.17
0.5
0.00
40%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Yoane Wissa played nearly every Newcastle match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Newcastle produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Yoane Wissa specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
expected goals (xG)
10%
6.1 / 63.6
goals
8%
1 / 12
shots
5%
31 / 595
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 299 strikers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Transition runner68%Target man67%Poacher67%Pressing forward56%
Why Transition runner 68%: a weighted blend of transition 72 (weight 45%) + box threat 65 (weight 25%) + defensive aggression 50 (weight 30%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
passing directness, final-third threat, transition
Average
carrying, box threat, progression, through-balls, build-up, crossing, line-breaking, defensive aggression, retention, ball-winning, press resistance, dribbling, receiving zones
Weak
creativity, territory (wide vs central)
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Passing directness
75
Final-third threat
73
Transition ~proxy
72
Carrying
67
Box threat
65
Progression
61
Through-balls ~proxy
61
Build-up
60
Crossing
58
Line-breaking
57
Defensive aggression
50
Retention
49
Ball-winning
47
Press resistance ~proxy
44
Dribbling
41
Receiving zones
40
Creativity
38
Territory (wide vs central)
6
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 176 cm / 75 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Ayoze Pérez Villarreal · La Liga · 178 cm / 66 kg
65%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (25%), transition (15%), passing directness (15%). Different mechanism — Pérez more via creativity, receiving zones.
Gustavo Varela Monza · Serie A · 184 cm / 74 kg
55%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (41%), final-third threat (15%). Different mechanism — Wissa more via ball-winning, transition; Varela more via dribbling, retention.
Jean-Philippe Mateta Crystal Palace · 192 cm / 88 kg
51%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (31%), passing directness (17%), box threat (10%). Different mechanism — Wissa more via build-up, carrying; Mateta more via crossing, line-breaking.
Duván Zapata Torino · Serie A · 189 cm / 88 kg
50%
Driven by: transition (17%), final-third threat (14%), passing directness (12%). Different mechanism — Zapata more via territory (wide vs central), through-balls.
Lucas Beltrán Valencia · La Liga 25/26 · 174 cm / 75 kg
49%
Driven by: transition (21%), territory (wide vs central) (17%), final-third threat (14%). Different mechanism — Wissa more via box threat; Beltrán more via creativity, receiving zones.
Gift Orban Hellas Verona · Serie A 25/26 · 178 cm / 73 kg
47%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (39%), transition (14%), box threat (12%). Different mechanism — Wissa more via through-balls, line-breaking; Orban more via dribbling, press resistance.
20

Summary

Yoane Wissa is a transition runner / target man: 1 goals from 2.81 xG (-1.81 vs expected), 18 shots, 2 box entries. Under-performing his chances. [Off-ball runs, aerials and hold-up under contact need tracking/aerial data.]

Based on 8 matches (656 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a transition runner / target man — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is defensive aggression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall transition runner profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report