His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
Signature: Not enough matches loaded yet to establish a repeatable signature for him.
Not a pattern: receive — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); progress — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); arrive — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); create / finish — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Insufficient sample: Amadou Haidara played nearly every Lens match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.
03
His Share of the Team
Of everything Lens produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Amadou Haidara specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
interceptions
2%
8 / 350
final-third entries
2%
32 / 1757
zone-14 entries
2%
6 / 347
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 383 central mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Tempo controller61%Deep-lying playmaker55%Advanced playmaker (8)36%Box-to-box runner21%
Why Tempo controller 61%: a weighted blend of retention 71 (weight 35%) + build-up 77 (weight 30%) + press resistance 29 (weight 20%) + progression 38 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Passing directness
92
Build-up
77
Retention
71
Receiving zones
60
Final-third threat
50
Crossing
49
Creativity
46
Progression
38
Through-balls ~proxy
34
Transition ~proxy
33
Press resistance ~proxy
29
Ball-winning
28
Line-breaking
28
Defensive aggression
17
Box threat
12
Carrying
7
Territory (wide vs central)
5
Dribbling
2
05
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 175 cm / 72 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Pol Lozano Espanyol · La Liga · 177 cm / 62 kg
84%
Driven by: dribbling (21%), carrying (15%), box threat (12%). Different mechanism — Haidara more via receiving zones; Lozano more via line-breaking, ball-winning.
Hugo Larsson Fulham · Premier League · 187 cm / 79 kg
82%
Driven by: defensive aggression (20%), territory (wide vs central) (14%), dribbling (14%). Different mechanism — Haidara more via passing directness; Larsson more via line-breaking, carrying.
Marc Aguado Elche · La Liga · 178 cm / 68 kg
81%
Driven by: dribbling (18%), box threat (15%), carrying (12%). Different mechanism — Haidara more via passing directness, receiving zones; Aguado more via ball-winning.
Lamare Bogarde Aston Villa · Premier League · 185 cm / 75 kg
73%
Driven by: dribbling (20%), box threat (18%), defensive aggression (12%). Different mechanism — Haidara more via passing directness, final-third threat; Bogarde more via territory (wide vs central), carrying.
Malthe Højholt Pisa · Serie A 25/26 · 182 cm / 65 kg
69%
Driven by: carrying (18%), dribbling (16%), box threat (11%). Different mechanism — Haidara more via receiving zones, final-third threat; Højholt more via defensive aggression, territory (wide vs central).
Stanislav Lobotka Napoli · Serie A · 168 cm / 68 kg
68%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (17%), box threat (17%), build-up (14%). Different mechanism — Lobotka more via carrying, transition.
06
Summary
Amadou Haidara is a tempo controller: 0.0 progressive passes, 0.00 key passes /90, 0 box entries, 0 goals from 0.00 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.
Based on 0 matches (0 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a tempo controller — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is press resistance — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall tempo controller profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
