العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportBundesliga 2025/26

Exequiel Palacios

Ipswich
Ball-winning 6 (destroyer) DM
14.7 defensive actions/90
defensive middeep-lying playmakerpress resistancescreening
1184
minutes
18 apps
1186
passes
91% completed
91%
pass completion
1186 passes
66
progressive passes
5.0/90
194
defensive actions
14.7/90
29
tackles + interceptions
43% tackle win
98
recoveries
7.4/90
40
line-breaking passes
3.0/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
drop between the centre-backs — mostly in the middle third (63% of his 1186 passes)
91% completion · 1186× in 17/17 matches
↓
ESCAPE PRESSURE
turn out of a tight central area
33% won · 12× in 10/17 matches
↓
PROGRESS CENTRAL
break a line through the middle
5.0 prog/90 · 40× in 14/17 matches
↓
SCREEN / WIN BALL
protect the back four
9.7 ball-wins/90 · 127× in 17/17 matches
↓
RECYCLE / PROGRESS
keep it ticking, feed the final third
9.0 f3-entries/90 · 118× in 15/17 matches
Signature: drop to receive → escape the press on the turn → progress centrally or recycle → screen the counter. Block the central lane and press his first touch to force him backwards.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
70
passes / match
14.7
def actions / 90
6–123
pass range (matches)
21
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (6 at the low end, 123 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

11

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

263 tracked carries (20.0/90, 51 progressive, 2351m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

0%2%5%8%6%0%8%17%21%3%0%4%10%13%3%
progressivelateral/short% of his 263 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 33m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
37Outside → Inside
184Inside → Inside
37Outside → Outside
5Inside → Outside
First (82)Second (80)Third (63)Fourth (38)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

21
tackle duels
9
won
12
beaten · 57%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 67%
OUTSIDE 33%
Tackle-duel location — 14 inside · 7 outside
Right Wing
2 · 10%
Right Half-Space
7 · 33%
Central
3 · 14%
Left Half-Space
4 · 19%
Left Wing
5 · 24%
Vision AI beaten in 12 of 21 tackle duels (57% loss rate) — a real defensive leak worth flagging.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Can he escape pressure on the ball? His carries/dribbles in tight central areas, by channel. Season rate: 0.90 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 58%
OUTSIDE 42%
Dribble location — 7 inside · 5 outside
Right Wing
3 · 25%
Right Half-Space
2 · 17%
Central
3 · 25%
Left Half-Space
2 · 17%
Left Wing
2 · 17%
Vision AI 58% of his carries are central — he receives and turns in congested midfield zones rather than out wide.
02

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

10%
vertical passes
39×
3%
switches
10×
31%
carries
121×
57%
short circulation
221×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW8355%4634%2811%9RHS25227%6933%8335%894%91%2C3326%2022%7238%12525%8310%32LHS2465%1225%6139%9532%78LW1611%19%1432%5159%95FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right wing in the middle third → the right half-space in the middle third — 6 progressive passes (8% of his progression) at 0.012 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 55% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 9% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 5% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 29 line-breaking passes and 118 final-third entries, 12.6 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
1%3%4%11%6%1%0%4%11%17%7%0%1%5%6%13%8%0%
completedincomplete1186 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
1186
passes
91%
completed
112
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 91% season completion rate.
03

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

66
progressive · 5.0/90
118
final-third entries · 9.0/90
20
box entries · 1.52/90
25
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

How does he create chances?

13 key passes (0.99/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
15%8%8%23%23%8%15%
chance creation (13)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
05

Where does he become vulnerable?

120 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

38
attacking third (cheap)
54
middle third
28
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 32% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 3.14 danger-index/90 · 0.344 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
06

What is his passing profile?

1186
passes attempted
41%
mostly sideways
67%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
483 · 41%
Sideways
489 · 41%
Backward
214 · 18%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
723 · 67%
Medium
325 · 30%
Long (>30m)
26 · 2%
07

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

1.040.520.340.320.280.27
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
1.04
Right Half-Space Att third → Right Half-Space Att third
4 passes
0.52
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Wing Att third
5 passes
0.34
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Half-Space Mid third
4 passes
0.32
Central Att third → Central Att third
2 passes · 1 to a shot
0.28
Central Mid third → Central Att third
2 passes
0.27
Central Mid third → Right Half-Space Mid third
4 passes
09

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Exequiel Palacios gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
21%
Primary
Central, Middle third
15%
Secondary
Right Half-Space, Middle third
15%
Third
Left Half-Space, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
10

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Exequiel Palacios actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
1657721599344531332008761142531317512
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%3%4%11%6%1%0%4%11%17%7%0%1%5%6%13%8%0%
own goal left, attacking →
08

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

13Key pass
3Cross
2Cutback
66Progressive
40Long ball
21Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
103Outside → Inside
629Inside → Inside
141Outside → Outside
201Inside → Outside
By direction
483Forward
214Backward
489Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
04

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the right hs in the final third — 4 passes worth 1.04 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 13 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he switches it out from the central to the left hs, advancing it forward in the middle third — 2 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 20% of his 25 touches there are lost (5 times).
20%5/25 lost14%4/28 lost7%3/43 lost16%7/45 lost9%3/32 lost10%5/49 lost9%15/176 lost4%11/250 lost9%16/172 lost6%6/98 lost10%2/21 lost14%11/78 lost15%9/62 lost16%10/62 lost11%5/45 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

194 defensive actions across the season (14.7/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
21
tackles · 43% won
8
interceptions · 0.6/90
98
recoveries · 7.4/90
21
clearances · 1.6/90
27
blocks
35
avg action height
18
won high (att 3rd)
71
middle third
105
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 127 proactive ball-wins (9.7/90), tackle success 43%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
14

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Exequiel Palacios still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~6-6 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 6.0, 6m)
89%
5.4
4.7
1.64
Mid press (PPDA 7.8, 6m)
90%
4.2
2.5
1.76
Low press (PPDA 11.4, 6m)
93%
5.8
2.6
2.17
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Ipswich's output per match with Exequiel Palacios (18 matches) versus without him (16 matches). What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (18)
WITHOUT (16)
Δ
goals against /match
1.39
1.38
+0.01
points /match
1.89
1.56
+0.33
goals for /match
2.22
1.75
+0.47
xG for /match
1.93
0.06
+1.87
16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Ipswich produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Exequiel Palacios specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
zone-14 entries
9%
45 / 520
half-space entries
8%
132 / 1667
ball recoveries
8%
148 / 1914
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 258 defensive mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Deep-lying playmaker70%Tempo controller66%Ball-winning 658%
Why Deep-lying playmaker 70%: a weighted blend of progression 91 (weight 30%) + build-up 59 (weight 30%) + retention 72 (weight 20%) + press resistance 40 (weight 20%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
receiving zones, final-third threat, progression, line-breaking, transition
Strong
creativity, carrying, crossing, retention
Average
passing directness, through-balls, build-up, ball-winning, defensive aggression, territory (wide vs central), press resistance
Weak
box threat, dribbling
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Receiving zones
99
Final-third threat
92
Progression
91
Line-breaking
89
Transition ~proxy
88
Creativity
82
Carrying
80
Crossing
74
Retention
72
Passing directness
68
Through-balls ~proxy
67
Build-up
59
Ball-winning
48
Defensive aggression
46
Territory (wide vs central)
40
Press resistance ~proxy
40
Box threat
31
Dribbling
14
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 176 cm / 69 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Koke Atletico · La Liga · 176 cm / 77 kg
89%
Driven by: receiving zones (13%), final-third threat (13%), progression (12%). Different mechanism — Palacios more via passing directness; Koke more via territory (wide vs central), through-balls.
Leon Avdullahu Hoffenheim · Bundesliga · 185 cm / 79 kg
88%
Driven by: receiving zones (15%), transition (14%), progression (13%). Different mechanism — Avdullahu more via build-up.
Youri Tielemans Man Utd · 176 cm / 72 kg
78%
Driven by: creativity (16%), receiving zones (15%), final-third threat (14%). Different mechanism — Palacios more via retention, transition; Tielemans more via box threat, dribbling.
Laurent Abergel Lorient · Ligue 1 25/26 · 185 cm / 65 kg
76%
Driven by: transition (17%), receiving zones (11%), dribbling (11%). Different mechanism — Palacios more via defensive aggression, line-breaking; Abergel more via build-up, passing directness.
Marten de Roon Roma · Serie A · 186 cm / 76 kg
76%
Driven by: receiving zones (19%), progression (13%), line-breaking (11%). Different mechanism — Palacios more via crossing, through-balls; Roon more via dribbling, passing directness.
Arthur Avom Lorient · Ligue 1 · 173 cm / 64 kg
75%
Driven by: transition (15%), final-third threat (14%), creativity (12%). Different mechanism — Palacios more via retention, receiving zones; Avom more via dribbling, box threat.
20

Summary

Exequiel Palacios is a deep-lying playmaker / tempo controller: 91% completion, 40 line-breaks and 5.0 progressive passes /90, resisting pressure with 33% dribble success. A central controller. [Off-ball screening position and scanning need tracking data.]

Based on 18 matches (1184 minutes) — a reasonable read, still building toward a full-season sample. He profiles as a deep-lying playmaker / tempo controller — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is press resistance — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall deep-lying playmaker profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report