العربيةSeason20262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026

Axel Disasi

Crystal Palace
Stopper centre-back CB
19.5 defensive actions/90 · 3.5 progressive/90 — defends first
centre-backball-playing centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
309
minutes
4 apps
125
passes
86% completed
86%
pass completion
125 passes
12
progressive passes
3.5/90
14
line-breaking passes
4.1/90
67
defensive actions
19.5/90
18
tackles + interceptions
75% tackle win
16
clearances
4.7/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Axel Disasi has played 4 matches (309 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the defensive third (65% of his 125 passes)
86% completion · 125× in 4/4 matches
↓
CARRY OUT
step into midfield to commit a presser
3 carries · 6× in 2/4 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
3.5 prog/90 · 14× in 4/4 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
1.7/90 · 6× in 2/4 matches
Signature: Receive → Carry Out → Break A Line → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: switch play — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
12

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
31
passes / match
19.5
def actions / 90
7–60
pass range (matches)
16
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (7 at the low end, 60 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

05

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

32 tracked carries (9.3/90, 10 progressive, 323m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

6%6%3%3%9%31%22%6%9%3%
progressivelateral/short% of his 32 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 9m, longest 26m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
30Inside → Inside
1Outside → Outside
1Inside → Outside
First (23)Second (9)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

8
tackle duels
6
won
2
beaten · 25%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 75%
OUTSIDE 25%
Tackle-duel location — 6 inside · 2 outside
Right Wing
2 · 25%
Right Half-Space
1 · 12%
Central
4 · 50%
Left Half-Space
1 · 12%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 2 of 8 tackle duels (25% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 3 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

08

How does he create chances?

1 key passes (0.29/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
100%
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
06

Where does he become vulnerable?

18 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

0
attacking third (cheap)
6
middle third
12
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 0% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 3.02 danger-index/90 · 0.577 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
03

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Axel Disasi gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
35%
Primary
Central, Defensive third
17%
Secondary
Central, Middle third
16%
Third
Right Half-Space, Defensive third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
04

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Axel Disasi actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
56518352272461273
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

5%10%6%1%14%28%18%6%1%1%4%5%4%
own goal left, attacking →
07

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

1Key pass
12Progressive
14Long ball
1Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
4Outside → Inside
65Inside → Inside
2Outside → Outside
37Inside → Outside
By direction
51Forward
9Backward
65Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches it out from the central to the right hs, advancing it forward in the defensive third — 3 passes worth 0.73 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the central in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the middle third: 33% of his 9 touches there are lost (3 times).
—3 touches · too few30%6/20 lost9%4/45 lost8%1/12 lost—1 touch · too few—4 touches · too few33%3/9 lost5%1/22 lost—7 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

09

How & where does he defend?

67 defensive actions across the season (19.5/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
8
tackles · 75% won
10
interceptions · 2.9/90
14
recoveries · 4.1/90
16
clearances · 4.7/90
1
blocks
28
avg action height
4
won high (att 3rd)
16
middle third
47
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 32 proactive ball-wins (9.3/90), tackle success 75%. He defends deep, protecting his box — a last-line stopper.
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

10

Impact on the Team

Crystal Palace's output per match with Axel Disasi (4 matches) versus without him (4 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 4 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (4)
WITHOUT (4)
Δ
goals against /match
2.75
2.00
+0.75
points /match
0.75
1.00
-0.25
goals for /match
1.50
0.75
+0.75
xG for /match
1.09
0.00
+1.09
11

His Share of the Team

Of everything Crystal Palace produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Axel Disasi specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
interceptions
6%
23 / 386
clearances
5%
65 / 1351
expected goals (xG)
3%
1.8 / 55.4
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

13

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 515 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Ball-playing centre-back52%Stopper centre-back31%
Why Ball-playing centre-back 52%: a weighted blend of retention 64 (weight 30%) + build-up 60 (weight 30%) + press resistance 69 (weight 15%) + progression 12 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
dribbling
Average
press resistance, retention, box threat, build-up, ball-winning, crossing
Weak
carrying, passing directness, territory (wide vs central), transition, defensive aggression, creativity, progression, receiving zones, line-breaking, final-third threat, through-balls
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Dribbling
71
Press resistance ~proxy
69
Retention
64
Box threat
61
Build-up
60
Ball-winning
46
Crossing
41
Carrying
33
Passing directness
30
Territory (wide vs central)
29
Transition ~proxy
24
Defensive aggression
24
Creativity
13
Progression
12
Receiving zones
11
Line-breaking
10
Final-third threat
7
Through-balls ~proxy
6
14

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 190 cm / 83 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Nobel Mendy Hull City · 187 cm / 78 kg
92%
Driven by: creativity (17%), final-third threat (13%), receiving zones (12%). Different mechanism — Disasi more via crossing, dribbling.
Micky van de Ven Tottenham · 193 cm / 81 kg
87%
Driven by: creativity (18%), line-breaking (11%), final-third threat (10%). Different mechanism — Ven more via carrying, transition.
Daniel Elfadli Hamburg · Bundesliga · 188 cm / 78 kg
85%
Driven by: final-third threat (15%), receiving zones (11%), progression (11%). Different mechanism — Disasi more via box threat; Elfadli more via retention, carrying.
Ville Koski Alaves · La Liga · 185 cm
83%
Driven by: creativity (16%), final-third threat (13%), progression (11%). Different mechanism — Disasi more via crossing, ball-winning; Koski more via passing directness.
Christian Kabasele Udinese · Serie A · 187 cm / 84 kg
83%
Driven by: final-third threat (14%), progression (13%), receiving zones (11%). Different mechanism — Disasi more via crossing, territory (wide vs central); Kabasele more via passing directness.
César Tárrega Valencia · La Liga · 194 cm / 78 kg
81%
Driven by: final-third threat (17%), progression (13%), transition (12%). Different mechanism — Disasi more via box threat, crossing; Tárrega more via defensive aggression, receiving zones.
15

Summary

Axel Disasi is a ball-playing centre-back: 86% pass completion, 14 line-breaking passes and 3.5 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 4 matches (309 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a ball-playing centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-playing centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report