العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLa Liga 2026

Kylian Mbappé

Real Madrid
Penalty-box poacher ST
5.0 shots/90 · 0.19 xG per shot — shoots from high-value spots · 0.93 xG/90
Capability Analysis
Finishing91%vs 23 strikers
"Does he finish better than the quality of chance he gets?"
Goals above expected5.47goals87%
Placement quality vs xG2.56index91%
Shots on target139.096%
Box Threat94%vs 23 strikers
"Is he a genuine goal threat by shot volume and quality?"
xG /900.75xG96%
Shots /904.8796%
xGOT /900.81xGOT91%
Goals vs xG (in line with xG): 11 goals from 9.7 xG (+1.3)
Ball-Carrying89%vs 23 strikers
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /904.2691%
Carry distance /90120.47m96%
Successful take-ons /902.7596%
Take-on success46.67%74%
Aerial Threat0%vs 23 strikers
"Is he a genuine aerial outlet -- can he win headers, not just occupy space?"
Aerial duels won /900.00%
Aerial win rate: 0.0%
strikerpoacherbox threatfinishing
941
minutes
10 apps
11
goals
9.74 xG
9.7
xG
52 shots
52
shots
0.19 xG/shot
15
box entries
1.43/90
15
key passes
1.43/90
65
dribbles
52% won
83%
pass completion
325 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE / MOVE
occupy the box, drop or run channel — mostly in the attacking third (56% of his 325 passes)
1.43 box entries/90 · 15× in 8/10 matches
↓
LINK
lay-off and combine
15 key passes · 83% completion · 325× in 10/10 matches
↓
FINISH
shoot from central zones
9.74 xG · 52× in 10/10 matches
↓
CONVERT
goals vs expected
11 goals (+1.3 vs xG) · 11× in 10/10 matches
Signature: occupy / move → link → shoot → convert.
21

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
32
passes / match
6.5
dribbles / match
18–42
pass range (matches)
4–10
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (18 at the low end, 42 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

10

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

108 tracked carries (10.3/90, 30 progressive, 1149m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

2%2%7%10%4%1%2%6%10%3%8%17%18%10%
progressivelateral/short% of his 108 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 9m, longest 32m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
30Outside → Inside
50Inside → Inside
23Outside → Outside
5Inside → Outside
First (34)Second (32)Third (26)Fourth (16)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Does he drop to link or stay central? Touches by channel. Season rate: 6.22 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 77%
OUTSIDE 23%
Dribble location — 50 inside · 15 outside
Right Wing
2 · 3%
Right Half-Space
10 · 15%
Central
14 · 22%
Left Half-Space
26 · 40%
Left Wing
13 · 20%
Vision AI His touches are central and high — a penalty-box striker.
16

How does he build & move the ball?

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW2962%1838%11RHS3839%1529%1129%113%1C6810%710%740%2731%219%6LHS753%23%227%2023%1745%34LW612%17%434%2157%35FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right wing in the final third → the right half-space in the final third — 4 progressive passes (15% of his progression) at 0.056 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 59% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 0% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 5% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 12 line-breaking passes and 31 final-third entries, -0.4 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
0%3%4%8%7%0%6%10%13%2%1%5%16%14%11%
completedincomplete325 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
325
passes
83%
completed
54
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 83% season completion rate.
14

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

20
progressive · 1.9/90
31
final-third entries · 3.0/90
15
box entries · 1.43/90
14
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
07

How does he create chances?

15 key passes (1.43/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
13%7%33%20%7%20%
chance creation (15)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (12)from the right (3)of 15 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
02

Can he finish?

52 shots · 9.74 xG · 11 goals (+1.26 vs xG). Mostly right-footed. Circle size = xG.

shots  52
on target  40
goals  11
xG  9.74
xG on target  10.49
xG / shot  0.187
Where he shoots from — click an area of the box
06

Where does he become vulnerable?

85 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

65
attacking third (cheap)
19
middle third
1
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 76% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.12 danger-index/90 · 0.138 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
11

What is his passing profile?

325
passes attempted
37%
mostly sideways
61%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
99 · 30%
Sideways
120 · 37%
Backward
106 · 33%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
166 · 61%
Medium
89 · 33%
Long (>30m)
16 · 6%
15

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.420.350.270.230.220.22
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.42
Central Att third → Left Half-Space Att third
2 passes · 1 to a shot
0.35
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.27
Left Half-Space Mid third → Central Att third
1 passes
0.23
Central Att third → Central Att third
1 passes
0.22
Central Mid third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.22
Central Att third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes
08

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Kylian Mbappé gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
18%
Primary
Left Half-Space, Attacking third
12%
Secondary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
12%
Third
Left Wing, Attacking third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
09

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Kylian Mbappé actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
42157615222033624619143030
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

0%3%4%8%7%0%6%10%13%2%1%5%16%14%11%
own goal left, attacking →
12

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

15Key pass
1Cross
10Cutback
20Progressive
19Long ball
11Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
36Outside → Inside
116Inside → Inside
54Outside → Outside
65Inside → Outside
By direction
99Forward
106Backward
120Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches it out from the central to the left hs in the final third — 2 passes worth 0.42 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 15 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the central in the final third — 3 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left half-space in the final third: 30% of his 54 touches there are lost (16 times).
—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—1 touch · too few—1 touch · too few—2 touches · too few14%2/14 lost8%1/12 lost5%2/41 lost12%5/41 lost10%3/31 lost19%4/21 lost26%9/35 lost12%4/32 lost30%16/54 lost21%8/39 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
05

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 108 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he carries through central areas (46%). He carries from outside into the middle 30 times and out toward the touchline 5 — a genuine inside forward who cuts in with the ball.
04

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
14 · 13%
Progressive / key pass
11 · 10%
Simple pass
57 · 53%
No clean link
26 · 24%
Of 108 carries, 13% flow straight into a shot of his own, 10% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 24% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
13

Crosses & Cutbacks

1 crosses (0.10/90, 1 completed) and 10 cutbacks (0.96/90, 6 completed) — two separate wide-delivery patterns into the box, each its own map with a completed/failed filter. Neither is a tagged event, so both are inferred from pass geometry — the intended end point of a failed attempt is still real data (an interception doesn’t erase where the ball was aimed): a cross is a pass aimed into the box starting from a wide channel; a cutback starts almost on the byline but is squared back rather than driven forward, aimed centrally around the box. The completed-cross count was checked against this platform’s own real match-level cross totals and lands within about 1 cross of the true count.

Crosses — close-up on the final third
Cutbacks — close-up on the final third
completedfailed (dashed)close-up on the box — attacking ↑ toward goal
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

18

How & where does he defend?

48 defensive actions across the season (4.6/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
3
tackles · 67% won
2
interceptions · 0.2/90
12
recoveries · 1.1/90
0
clearances · 0.0/90
3
blocks
61
avg action height
20
won high (att 3rd)
19
middle third
9
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 17 proactive ball-wins (1.6/90), tackle success 67%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

29
attacking-half actions · 2.77/90
17

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Kylian Mbappé keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~3-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 5.3, 3m)
0.43
0.6
1.88
47%
Mid press (PPDA 8.0, 3m)
0.83
2.0
1.99
50%
Low press (PPDA 9.5, 4m)
0.88
2.8
0.71
56%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

19

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Kylian Mbappé played nearly every Real Madrid match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

20

His Share of the Team

Of everything Real Madrid produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Kylian Mbappé specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
goals
48%
11 / 23
expected goals (xG)
28%
30.5 / 107.3
shots
20%
198 / 978
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

22

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 299 strikers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Poacher92%Target man92%False 987%Transition runner72%
Why Poacher 92%: a weighted blend of box threat 98 (weight 55%) + final-third threat 95 (weight 30%) + press resistance 87 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
receiving zones, box threat, carrying, final-third threat, retention, progression, through-balls, creativity, line-breaking, dribbling, press resistance, crossing
Strong
—
Average
passing directness, territory (wide vs central), transition, build-up, defensive aggression
Weak
ball-winning
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Receiving zones
99
Box threat
98
Carrying
96
Final-third threat
95
Retention
94
Progression
92
Through-balls ~proxy
92
Creativity
91
Line-breaking
90
Dribbling
89
Press resistance ~proxy
87
Crossing
86
Passing directness
64
Territory (wide vs central)
64
Transition ~proxy
61
Build-up
59
Defensive aggression
51
Ball-winning
12
23

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 178 cm / 75 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Nicolas Jackson Aston Villa · Premier League · 187 cm / 82 kg
91%
Driven by: receiving zones (12%), box threat (10%), crossing (9%). Different mechanism — Mbappé more via passing directness; Jackson more via ball-winning.
Julián Alvarez Atletico · 170 cm / 71 kg
90%
Driven by: creativity (11%), receiving zones (10%), press resistance (10%). Different mechanism — Mbappé more via box threat, passing directness; Alvarez more via ball-winning.
João Pedro Chelsea · Premier League · 186 cm / 70 kg
87%
Driven by: final-third threat (12%), receiving zones (11%), carrying (9%). Different mechanism — Mbappé more via box threat, retention; Pedro more via ball-winning.
Raphinha Barcelona · 176 cm / 64 kg
87%
Driven by: box threat (12%), creativity (11%), receiving zones (10%). Different mechanism — Mbappé more via passing directness; Raphinha more via ball-winning, territory (wide vs central).
Christian Pulisic AC Milan · Serie A · 178 cm / 73 kg
83%
Driven by: creativity (11%), receiving zones (10%), final-third threat (9%). Different mechanism — Mbappé more via defensive aggression, box threat; Pulisic more via ball-winning, territory (wide vs central).
Mikel Oyarzabal Real Sociedad · 181 cm / 79 kg
83%
Driven by: final-third threat (10%), press resistance (9%), carrying (9%). Different mechanism — Mbappé more via box threat, receiving zones; Oyarzabal more via ball-winning.
24

Summary

Kylian Mbappé is a poacher / target man: 11 goals from 9.74 xG (+1.26 vs expected), 52 shots, 15 box entries. A clinical finisher. [Off-ball runs, aerials and hold-up under contact need tracking/aerial data.]

Based on 10 matches (941 minutes) — a reasonable read, still building toward a full-season sample. He profiles as a poacher / target man — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is press resistance — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall poacher profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report