العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLa Liga 2025/26

Eray Cömert

Torino
Ball-playing centre-back CB
5.7 progressive passes/90 · 0.5 line-breaking/90
centre-backball-playing centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
1447
minutes
17 apps
804
passes
86% completed
86%
pass completion
804 passes
91
progressive passes
5.7/90
103
line-breaking passes
6.4/90
221
defensive actions
13.7/90
46
tackles + interceptions
58% tackle win
88
clearances
5.5/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the defensive third (50% of his 804 passes)
86% completion · 804× in 17/17 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
5.7 prog/90 · 103× in 16/17 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 36× in 15/17 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
3.1/90 · 50× in 14/17 matches
Signature: Receive → Break A Line → Switch Play → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: carry out — 4× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
47
passes / match
13.7
def actions / 90
3–79
pass range (matches)
88
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (3 at the low end, 79 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

10

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

188 tracked carries (11.7/90, 37 progressive, 1642m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

1%3%3%1%1%20%14%7%5%21%17%5%1%
progressivelateral/short% of his 188 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 27m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
11Outside → Inside
139Inside → Inside
19Outside → Outside
19Inside → Outside
First (87)Second (43)Third (33)Fourth (25)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

26
tackle duels
15
won
11
beaten · 42%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 69%
OUTSIDE 31%
Tackle-duel location — 18 inside · 8 outside
Right Wing
2 · 8%
Right Half-Space
5 · 19%
Central
9 · 35%
Left Half-Space
4 · 15%
Left Wing
6 · 23%
Vision AI beaten in 11 of 26 tackle duels (42% loss rate) — a real defensive leak worth flagging.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 2 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

02

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

14%
vertical passes
83×
5%
switches
31×
27%
carries
160×
54%
short circulation
316×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW4340%1733%1428%12RHS6525%1618%1249%328%5C2357%1620%4840%9518%4314%33LHS2484%106%1638%9319%4833%81LW1002%227%2734%3437%37FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the left wing in the middle third → the left half-space in the middle third — 5 progressive passes (12% of his progression) at 0.043 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 45% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 20% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

8% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.

Quality behind the volume: 8 line-breaking passes and 50 final-third entries, 12.1 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
3%5%4%2%0%0%5%15%16%4%0%0%5%18%15%7%1%0%
completedincomplete804 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
804
passes
86%
completed
113
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 86% season completion rate.
03

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

91
progressive · 5.7/90
50
final-third entries · 3.1/90
1
box entries · 0.06/90
17
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

How does he create chances?

5 key passes (0.31/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
20%40%20%20%
chance creation (5)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
06

Where does he become vulnerable?

115 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

3
attacking third (cheap)
53
middle third
59
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 3% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 3.94 danger-index/90 · 0.552 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
05

What is his passing profile?

804
passes attempted
53%
mostly forward
51%
mostly medium
Direction
Forward
427 · 53%
Sideways
236 · 29%
Backward
141 · 18%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
281 · 41%
Medium
353 · 51%
Long (>30m)
57 · 8%
07

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

1.180.530.470.460.360.36
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
1.18
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Att third
8 passes
0.53
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Half-Space Att third
3 passes
0.47
Central Mid third → Right Wing Att third
3 passes
0.46
Left Wing Mid third → Left Wing Att third
3 passes · 1 to a shot
0.36
Left Half-Space Def third → Right Wing Mid third
5 passes
0.36
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Half-Space Mid third
4 passes
08

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Eray Cömert gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
17%
Primary
Left Half-Space, Defensive third
17%
Secondary
Central, Defensive third
17%
Third
Left Half-Space, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
09

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Eray Cömert actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
38145118549143122125333102238351623
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

3%5%4%2%0%0%5%15%16%4%0%0%5%18%15%7%1%0%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

5Key pass
1Cross
3Cutback
91Progressive
103Long ball
36Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
87Outside → Inside
392Inside → Inside
56Outside → Outside
156Inside → Outside
By direction
427Forward
141Backward
236Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
04

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches it out from the left hs to the left wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 8 passes worth 1.18 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 5 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the central in the final third — 2 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the middle third: 28% of his 18 touches there are lost (5 times).
21%7/33 lost12%4/33 lost11%15/137 lost13%18/141 lost23%14/62 lost28%5/18 lost15%6/41 lost15%19/129 lost10%13/135 lost16%9/56 lost—4 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—4 touches · too few—4 touches · too few—5 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

221 defensive actions across the season (13.7/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
26
tackles · 58% won
20
interceptions · 1.2/90
46
recoveries · 2.9/90
88
clearances · 5.5/90
2
blocks
25
avg action height
8
won high (att 3rd)
46
middle third
167
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 92 proactive ball-wins (5.7/90), tackle success 58%. He defends deep, protecting his box — a last-line stopper.
14

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Eray Cömert still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~5-7 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 4.1, 5m)
80%
3.9
6.5
0.68
Mid press (PPDA 5.1, 5m)
88%
5.1
5.8
0.97
Low press (PPDA 7.5, 7m)
87%
6.9
6.8
1.14
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Torino's output per match with Eray Cömert (17 matches) versus without him (21 matches). What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (17)
WITHOUT (21)
Δ
goals against /match
1.47
1.43
+0.04
points /match
1.35
1.24
+0.11
goals for /match
1.29
1.14
+0.15
xG for /match
1.23
0.83
+0.40
16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Torino produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Eray Cömert specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
clearances
8%
105 / 1374
interceptions
6%
23 / 397
goals
5%
2 / 37
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 515 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Ball-playing centre-back55%Stopper centre-back32%
Why Ball-playing centre-back 55%: a weighted blend of build-up 70 (weight 30%) + progression 57 (weight 25%) + retention 43 (weight 30%) + press resistance 35 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
crossing, box threat
Average
build-up, final-third threat, through-balls, line-breaking, progression, carrying, ball-winning, territory (wide vs central), creativity, retention, receiving zones
Weak
passing directness, transition, press resistance, dribbling, defensive aggression
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Crossing
74
Box threat
73
Build-up
70
Final-third threat
69
Through-balls ~proxy
65
Line-breaking
60
Progression
57
Carrying
50
Ball-winning
49
Territory (wide vs central)
44
Creativity
43
Retention
43
Receiving zones
43
Passing directness
40
Transition ~proxy
38
Press resistance ~proxy
35
Dribbling
26
Defensive aggression
25
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 183 cm / 80 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Nathan Aké Man City · Premier League 25/26 · 180 cm / 84 kg
66%
Driven by: defensive aggression (23%), dribbling (18%), crossing (15%). Different mechanism — Cömert more via ball-winning, dribbling; Aké more via territory (wide vs central), creativity.
Antonio Rüdiger Real Madrid · La Liga · 190 cm / 85 kg
65%
Driven by: dribbling (24%), build-up (17%), box threat (14%). Different mechanism — Cömert more via ball-winning, crossing; Rüdiger more via retention.
Saba Goglichidze Monza · 192 cm / 82 kg
64%
Driven by: dribbling (18%), press resistance (17%), defensive aggression (14%). Different mechanism — Cömert more via carrying, crossing; Goglichidze more via through-balls, line-breaking.
Amos Pieper Werder Bremen · Bundesliga · 192 cm / 86 kg
60%
Driven by: dribbling (27%), press resistance (21%), crossing (12%). Different mechanism — Cömert more via box threat, dribbling; Pieper more via passing directness, defensive aggression.
Rosen Bozhinov Pisa 25/26 · 193 cm
59%
Driven by: dribbling (21%), press resistance (16%), crossing (13%). Different mechanism — Cömert more via box threat, creativity; Bozhinov more via line-breaking, progression.
Ladislav Krejcí Wolves · Premier League 25/26 · 191 cm / 87 kg
59%
Driven by: crossing (16%), box threat (14%), dribbling (14%). Different mechanism — Cömert more via build-up; Krejcí more via territory (wide vs central), passing directness.
20

Summary

Eray Cömert is a ball-playing centre-back: 86% pass completion, 103 line-breaking passes and 5.7 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 17 matches (1447 minutes) — a reasonable read, still building toward a full-season sample. He profiles as a ball-playing centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is press resistance — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-playing centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report