العربيةSeason20262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLigue 1 2026

Gaëtan Perrin

Lille
Half-space creator AM
39% of actions in the half-spaces
attacking midhalf-space creatorcreationbetween the lines
146
minutes
4 apps
0
key passes
0.00/90
1
progressive passes
0.6/90
1
box entries
0.62/90
3
final-3rd entries
1.8/90
0
goals
0.09 xG
5
dribbles
40% won
80%
pass completion
41 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Gaëtan Perrin has played 4 matches (146 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Central, Middle third — between the lines — mostly in the middle third (51% of his 41 passes)
80% completion · 41× in 4/4 matches
↓
TURN / BEAT MAN
face forward in the pocket
40% won · 5× in 4/4 matches
Signature: Receive → Turn / Beat Man — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: create — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); finish — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

03

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

14 tracked carries (8.6/90, 4 progressive, 129m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

7%14%7%21%14%14%14%7%
progressivelateral/short% of his 14 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 16m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
3Outside → Inside
7Inside → Inside
2Outside → Outside
2Inside → Outside
First (14)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Only 5 dribbles attempted this season — too little volume to map a location pattern.

02

How does he create chances?

0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
04

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the central in the middle third: 11% of his 9 touches there are lost (1 times).
—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—3 touches · too few11%1/9 lost—5 touches · too few—4 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—4 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—4 touches · too few—4 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

05

How & where does he defend?

24 defensive actions across the season (14.8/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
4
tackles · 50% won
0
interceptions · 0.0/90
10
recoveries · 6.2/90
2
clearances · 1.2/90
1
blocks
42
avg action height
2
won high (att 3rd)
14
middle third
8
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 14 proactive ball-wins (8.6/90), tackle success 50%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

8
attacking-half actions · 4.93/90
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

06

Impact on the Team

Lille's output per match with Gaëtan Perrin (4 matches) versus without him (4 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 4 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (4)
WITHOUT (4)
Δ
goals for /match
1.75
1.00
+0.75
xG for /match
0.91
1.29
-0.38
goals against /match
0.50
1.00
-0.50
points /match
2.50
1.25
+1.25
07

His Share of the Team

Of everything Lille produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Gaëtan Perrin specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
5%
12 / 222
box entries
3%
18 / 544
tackles
3%
16 / 492
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

08

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 247 attacking mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Half-space creator63%Advanced playmaker (8)57%
Why Half-space creator 63%: a weighted blend of creativity 59 (weight 40%) + final-third threat 69 (weight 30%) + dribbling 91 (weight 15%) + box threat 26 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
dribbling
Strong
defensive aggression
Average
passing directness, final-third threat, press resistance, territory (wide vs central), ball-winning, crossing, progression, creativity, transition, line-breaking, carrying, receiving zones
Weak
retention, through-balls, build-up, box threat
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Dribbling
91
Defensive aggression
79
Passing directness
70
Final-third threat
69
Press resistance ~proxy
68
Territory (wide vs central)
63
Ball-winning
62
Crossing
61
Progression
60
Creativity
59
Transition ~proxy
54
Line-breaking
51
Carrying
50
Receiving zones
50
Retention
37
Through-balls ~proxy
30
Build-up
28
Box threat
26
09

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 169 cm / 63 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Yankuba Minteh Brighton · Premier League 25/26 · 180 cm / 65 kg
68%
Driven by: dribbling (24%), build-up (20%), box threat (13%). Different mechanism — Perrin more via final-third threat, creativity; Minteh more via through-balls, territory (wide vs central).
Ander Barrenetxea Real Sociedad · La Liga · 175 cm / 74 kg
52%
Driven by: dribbling (32%), ball-winning (9%), press resistance (9%). Different mechanism — Perrin more via passing directness, defensive aggression; Barrenetxea more via through-balls, carrying.
Junior Messias Genoa · Serie A · 174 cm / 70 kg
52%
Driven by: dribbling (30%), defensive aggression (11%), passing directness (11%). Different mechanism — Perrin more via crossing; Messias more via carrying, box threat.
Gessime Yassine Strasbourg · 172 cm / 56 kg
47%
Driven by: dribbling (21%), weight (12%), box threat (12%). Different mechanism — Perrin more via passing directness, final-third threat; Yassine more via through-balls, carrying.
Brajan Gruda RBL · Bundesliga · 178 cm / 70 kg
46%
Driven by: dribbling (32%), defensive aggression (16%), build-up (15%). Different mechanism — Perrin more via passing directness; Gruda more via carrying, box threat.
Tyrhys Dolan Espanyol · La Liga · 164 cm / 63 kg
44%
Driven by: defensive aggression (17%), box threat (16%), build-up (16%). Different mechanism — Perrin more via dribbling, final-third threat; Dolan more via territory (wide vs central), carrying.
10

Summary

Gaëtan Perrin is a half-space creator / advanced playmaker (8): 0.00 key passes /90, 0.6 progressive passes, 0 goals from 0.09 xG. A between-the-lines creator. [Off-ball movement into pockets needs tracking.]

Based on 4 matches (146 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a half-space creator / advanced playmaker (8) — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is box threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall half-space creator profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report