العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportSerie A 2025/26

Kostas Tsimikas

Liverpool
Central midfielder CM
balanced central profile
central middeep-lying playmakerprogressionbox-to-box
709
minutes
18 apps
26
progressive passes
3.3/90
73%
pass completion
346 passes
4
key passes
0.51/90
4
box entries
0.51/90
17
final-3rd entries
2.2/90
16
dribbles
38% won
102
possessions lost
3.36 danger/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Left Wing, Middle third — mostly in the middle third (43% of his 346 passes)
73% completion · 346× in 18/18 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive or pass into the final third
3.3 prog/90 · 26× in 15/18 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
0.51 key passes /90 · 0 goals · 11× in 3/18 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress → Create / Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: arrive — 4× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
20

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
19
passes / match
1.6
dribbles / match
3–67
pass range (matches)
1–3
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (3 at the low end, 67 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

10

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

59 tracked carries (7.5/90, 11 progressive, 462m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

2%2%2%22%14%19%34%7%
progressivelateral/short% of his 59 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 23m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
5Outside → Inside
4Inside → Inside
44Outside → Outside
6Inside → Outside
First (24)Second (17)Third (13)Fourth (5)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Kostas Tsimikas's signature is the dribble. Does he carry outside (down the left wing) or inside (into the half-space / centre)? Every dribble classified by channel. Season rate: 2.18 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 6%
OUTSIDE 94%
Dribble location — 1 inside · 15 outside
Right Wing
1 · 6%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
0 · 0%
Left Half-Space
1 · 6%
Left Wing
14 · 88%
Vision AI 94% of his dribbles are in the wide left lane — he attacks the full-back on the outside, then threatens to cut inside onto his right foot.
07

How does he build & move the ball?

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW450%225%125%1RHS0C911%144%422%222%2LHS264%138%1023%635%9LW2151%27%1540%8553%113FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the left wing in the final third → the left half-space in the final third — 7 progressive passes (15% of his progression) at 0.063 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 65% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 0% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 4% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 12 line-breaking passes and 17 final-third entries, 4.7 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
1%0%1%0%0%1%1%1%1%3%18%20%21%19%13%
completedincomplete346 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
346
passes
73%
completed
92
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 73% season completion rate.
05

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

26
progressive · 3.3/90
17
final-third entries · 2.2/90
4
box entries · 0.51/90
17
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
03

How does he create chances?

4 key passes (0.51/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
25%25%50%
chance creation (4)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
06

Where does he become vulnerable?

102 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

54
attacking third (cheap)
30
middle third
18
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 53% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 3.36 danger-index/90 · 0.260 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
13

What is his passing profile?

346
passes attempted
38%
mostly forward
58%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
132 · 38%
Sideways
92 · 27%
Backward
122 · 35%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
148 · 58%
Medium
88 · 35%
Long (>30m)
18 · 7%
12

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.500.330.330.300.240.21
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.50
Left Wing Mid third → Left Wing Att third
4 passes
0.33
Left Wing Mid third → Left Wing Mid third
4 passes
0.33
Left Wing Att third → Left Wing Att third
2 passes
0.30
Left Wing Att third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes · 1 to a shot
0.24
Left Half-Space Att third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.21
Left Wing Def third → Left Wing Mid third
4 passes
08

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Kostas Tsimikas gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
36%
Primary
Left Wing, Middle third
28%
Secondary
Left Wing, Attacking third
18%
Third
Left Wing, Defensive third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
09

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Kostas Tsimikas actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
1063707669531423633231
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%0%1%0%0%1%1%1%1%3%18%20%21%19%13%
own goal left, attacking →
14

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

4Key pass
6Cross
8Cutback
26Progressive
58Long ball
10Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
104Outside → Inside
24Inside → Inside
115Outside → Outside
11Inside → Outside
By direction
132Forward
122Backward
92Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the left wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 4 passes worth 0.50 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 4 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the left wing toward the right hs in the final third — 2 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left half-space in the final third: 71% of his 17 touches there are lost (12 times).
—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—4 touches · too few20%2/10 lost23%15/64 lost—4 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—4 touches · too few19%3/16 lost16%20/124 lost—3 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—3 touches · too few71%12/17 lost35%33/95 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
04

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 59 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he drives along the touchline (75%). He carries from outside into the middle 5 times and out toward the touchline 6 — balanced between cutting in and holding width.
11

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
1 · 2%
Progressive / key pass
11 · 19%
Simple pass
38 · 64%
No clean link
9 · 15%
Of 59 carries, 2% flow straight into a shot of his own, 19% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 15% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
15

Crosses & Cutbacks

6 crosses (0.76/90, 2 completed) and 8 cutbacks (1.02/90, 1 completed) — two separate wide-delivery patterns into the box, each its own map with a completed/failed filter. Neither is a tagged event, so both are inferred from pass geometry — the intended end point of a failed attempt is still real data (an interception doesn’t erase where the ball was aimed): a cross is a pass aimed into the box starting from a wide channel; a cutback starts almost on the byline but is squared back rather than driven forward, aimed centrally around the box. The completed-cross count was checked against this platform’s own real match-level cross totals and lands within about 1 cross of the true count.

Crosses — close-up on the final third
Cutbacks — close-up on the final third
completedfailed (dashed)close-up on the box — attacking ↑ toward goal
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

16

How & where does he defend?

88 defensive actions across the season (11.2/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
11
tackles · 55% won
8
interceptions · 1.0/90
26
recoveries · 3.3/90
18
clearances · 2.3/90
8
blocks
36
avg action height
10
won high (att 3rd)
30
middle third
48
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 45 proactive ball-wins (5.7/90), tackle success 55%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
17

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Kostas Tsimikas keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~6-6 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 4.5, 6m)
0.90
3.0
0.60
57%
Mid press (PPDA 6.2, 6m)
1.07
4.1
0.58
0%
Low press (PPDA 7.4, 6m)
1.07
3.2
0.35
22%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

18

Impact on the Team

Liverpool's output per match with Kostas Tsimikas (18 matches) versus without him (20 matches). A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (18)
WITHOUT (20)
Δ
goals for /match
1.28
1.80
-0.52
xG for /match
1.21
1.30
-0.09
goals against /match
1.00
0.65
+0.35
points /match
1.61
2.20
-0.59
19

His Share of the Team

Of everything Liverpool produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Kostas Tsimikas specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
2%
8 / 357
progressive passes
2%
54 / 2566
interceptions
2%
9 / 477
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

21

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 382 central mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Deep-lying playmaker48%Tempo controller39%Box-to-box runner37%Advanced playmaker (8)29%
Why Deep-lying playmaker 48%: a weighted blend of progression 66 (weight 30%) + build-up 53 (weight 30%) + press resistance 46 (weight 20%) + retention 21 (weight 20%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
territory (wide vs central)
Strong
dribbling
Average
line-breaking, progression, passing directness, build-up, press resistance, ball-winning
Weak
through-balls, crossing, defensive aggression, final-third threat, box threat, transition, carrying, receiving zones, retention, creativity
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Territory (wide vs central)
100
Dribbling
71
Line-breaking
70
Progression
66
Passing directness
53
Build-up
53
Press resistance ~proxy
46
Ball-winning
41
Through-balls ~proxy
36
Crossing
36
Defensive aggression
35
Final-third threat
35
Box threat
31
Transition ~proxy
31
Carrying
31
Receiving zones
24
Retention
21
Creativity
15
22

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 179 cm / 77 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Sascha Britschgi Parma Calcio 1913 · Serie A · 182 cm / 78 kg
73%
Driven by: creativity (22%), territory (wide vs central) (16%), retention (11%). Different mechanism — Tsimikas more via dribbling, passing directness.
Giuseppe Pezzella Cremonese · Serie A 25/26 · 185 cm / 81 kg
72%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (22%), receiving zones (14%), creativity (14%). Different mechanism — Tsimikas more via line-breaking, dribbling.
David Møller Wolfe Hamburg · Bundesliga · 185 cm / 79 kg
70%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (15%), creativity (14%), retention (11%). Different mechanism — Tsimikas more via dribbling, line-breaking; Wolfe more via passing directness.
Nikolas Veratschnig Mainz · Bundesliga 25/26 · 180 cm / 75 kg
70%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (21%), retention (12%), receiving zones (11%). Different mechanism — Tsimikas more via build-up, box threat; Veratschnig more via ball-winning, passing directness.
Tommaso Barbieri Cremonese · Serie A 25/26 · 181 cm / 59 kg
68%
Driven by: retention (20%), territory (wide vs central) (19%), creativity (16%). Different mechanism — Tsimikas more via build-up, territory (wide vs central); Barbieri more via carrying, creativity.
Javi Rueda Celta Vigo · La Liga · 177 cm / 74 kg
68%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (24%), transition (17%), retention (12%). Different mechanism — Tsimikas more via passing directness, build-up; Rueda more via creativity, receiving zones.
23

Summary

Kostas Tsimikas is a deep-lying playmaker: 3.3 progressive passes, 0.51 key passes /90, 4 box entries, 0 goals from 0.46 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.

Based on 18 matches (709 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a deep-lying playmaker — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is retention — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall deep-lying playmaker profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report