العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026

Erling Haaland

Man City
Penalty-box poacher ST
3.6 shots/90 · 0.16 xG per shot — shoots from high-value spots · 0.56 xG/90
Capability Analysis
Finishing72%vs 18 strikers
"Does he finish better than the quality of chance he gets?"
Goals above expected8.15goals94%
Placement quality vs xG-2.07index28%
Shots on target104.094%
Box Threat94%vs 18 strikers
"Is he a genuine goal threat by shot volume and quality?"
xG /900.65xG94%
Shots /903.6294%
xGOT /900.6xGOT94%
Goals vs xG (overperforming xG -- clinical, scoring more than the chances alone predict): 9 goals from 4.7 xG (+4.3)
Ball-Carrying32%vs 18 strikers
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /900.846%
Carry distance /9024.06m0%
Successful take-ons /900.5139%
Take-on success44.0%83%
Aerial Threat0%vs 18 strikers
"Is he a genuine aerial outlet -- can he win headers, not just occupy space?"
Aerial duels won /900.00%
Aerial win rate: 0.0%
strikerpoacherbox threatfinishing
750
minutes
8 apps
9
goals
4.66 xG
4.7
xG
30 shots
30
shots
0.16 xG/shot
2
box entries
0.24/90
3
key passes
0.36/90
12
dribbles
42% won
67%
pass completion
94 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

LINK
lay-off and combine
3 key passes · 67% completion · 94× in 8/8 matches
↓
FINISH
shoot from central zones
4.66 xG · 30× in 8/8 matches
↓
CONVERT
goals vs expected
9 goals (+4.3 vs xG) · 9× in 8/8 matches
Signature: Link → Finish → Convert — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: receive / move — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

07

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

21 tracked carries (2.5/90, 7 progressive, 237m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

5%5%5%10%5%19%29%5%5%10%5%
progressivelateral/short% of his 21 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 39m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
2Outside → Inside
17Inside → Inside
2Outside → Outside
First (21)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Does he drop to link or stay central? Touches by channel. Season rate: 1.44 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 92%
OUTSIDE 8%
Dribble location — 11 inside · 1 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
1 · 8%
Central
6 · 50%
Left Half-Space
4 · 33%
Left Wing
1 · 8%
Vision AI His touches are central and high — a penalty-box striker.
04

How does he create chances?

3 key passes (0.36/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
33%67%
chance creation (3)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (0)from the right (3)of 3 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
02

Can he finish?

30 shots · 4.66 xG · 9 goals (+4.34 vs xG). Mostly left-footed. Circle size = xG.

shots  30
on target  21
goals  9
xG  4.66
xG on target  4.64
xG / shot  0.155
Where he shoots from — click an area of the box
05

Where does he become vulnerable?

38 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

15
attacking third (cheap)
21
middle third
2
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 39% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.13 danger-index/90 · 0.247 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
06

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Erling Haaland actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
3393321626213313733
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%3%7%3%3%2%16%26%17%3%3%3%7%2%2%
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches it out from the left hs to the left wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 2 passes worth 0.12 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 3 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the central in the final third — 2 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the middle third: 50% of his 12 touches there are lost (6 times).
—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—2 touches · too few50%6/12 lost21%7/34 lost45%5/11 lost—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—7 touches · too few27%4/15 lost—4 touches · too few—2 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

09

How & where does he defend?

75 defensive actions across the season (9.0/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
1
tackles · 100% won
1
interceptions · 0.1/90
15
recoveries · 1.8/90
12
clearances · 1.4/90
3
blocks
52
avg action height
19
won high (att 3rd)
38
middle third
18
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 17 proactive ball-wins (2.0/90), tackle success 100%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

50
attacking-half actions · 6.00/90
08

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Erling Haaland keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 4.5, 2m)
0.18
0.9
0.00
40%
Mid press (PPDA 5.5, 2m)
0.06
1.0
0.00
0%
Low press (PPDA 8.0, 4m)
0.14
0.5
0.70
60%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

10

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Erling Haaland played nearly every Man City match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

11

His Share of the Team

Of everything Man City produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Erling Haaland specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
goals
45%
9 / 20
expected goals (xG)
26%
27.8 / 107.1
shots
17%
156 / 913
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

12

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 299 strikers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Poacher71%Target man67%False 950%Transition runner34%
Why Poacher 71%: a weighted blend of box threat 89 (weight 55%) + final-third threat 30 (weight 30%) + press resistance 54 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
box threat
Strong
passing directness
Average
press resistance, dribbling, receiving zones, retention, creativity, build-up
Weak
transition, final-third threat, crossing, line-breaking, through-balls, defensive aggression, progression, ball-winning, carrying, territory (wide vs central)
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Box threat
89
Passing directness
73
Press resistance ~proxy
54
Dribbling
53
Receiving zones
49
Retention
48
Creativity
46
Build-up
42
Transition ~proxy
30
Final-third threat
30
Crossing
28
Line-breaking
24
Through-balls ~proxy
24
Defensive aggression
21
Progression
21
Ball-winning
20
Carrying
17
Territory (wide vs central)
2
13

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 195 cm / 94 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Patrik Schick Leverkusen · Bundesliga · 191 cm / 86 kg
77%
Driven by: defensive aggression (16%), box threat (13%), ball-winning (11%). Different mechanism — Haaland more via passing directness; Schick more via retention, build-up.
Benjamin Sesko Man Utd · 195 cm / 85 kg
76%
Driven by: box threat (13%), progression (12%), ball-winning (11%). Different mechanism — Sesko more via through-balls, territory (wide vs central).
Haris Tabakovic Borussia Monchengladbach · Bundesliga 25/26 · 196 cm / 90 kg
76%
Driven by: ball-winning (12%), territory (wide vs central) (11%), carrying (11%). Different mechanism — Haaland more via passing directness, box threat; Tabakovic more via build-up.
Vedat Muriqi Mallorca · La Liga 25/26 · 194 cm / 92 kg
75%
Driven by: box threat (20%), ball-winning (16%), weight (10%). Different mechanism — Muriqi more via territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression.
Breel Embolo Rennes · Ligue 1 25/26 · 187 cm / 84 kg
71%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (18%), defensive aggression (17%), crossing (12%). Different mechanism — Haaland more via box threat; Embolo more via ball-winning, transition.
Dusan Vlahovic Juventus · Serie A 25/26 · 190 cm / 88 kg
70%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (19%), box threat (18%), ball-winning (10%). Different mechanism — Haaland more via dribbling, press resistance; Vlahovic more via defensive aggression, receiving zones.
14

Summary

Erling Haaland is a poacher / target man: 9 goals from 4.66 xG (+4.34 vs expected), 30 shots, 2 box entries. A clinical finisher. [Off-ball runs, aerials and hold-up under contact need tracking/aerial data.]

Based on 8 matches (750 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a poacher / target man — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is final-third threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall poacher profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report