العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportSerie A 2026

David Neres

Napoli
Advanced playmaker AM
2.40 key passes/90 · 0.25 xT/90
attacking midadvanced playmaker (8)creationbetween the lines
150
minutes
4 apps
4
key passes
2.40/90
2
progressive passes
1.2/90
3
box entries
1.80/90
4
final-3rd entries
2.4/90
0
goals
0.53 xG
8
dribbles
12% won
82%
pass completion
55 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. David Neres has played 4 matches (150 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Right Wing, Attacking third — between the lines — mostly in the attacking third (49% of his 55 passes)
82% completion · 55× in 4/4 matches
↓
TURN / BEAT MAN
face forward in the pocket
12% won · 8× in 4/4 matches
↓
CREATE
through-ball, cut-back, key pass
2.40/90 · 4× in 2/4 matches
↓
FINISH
arrive and shoot from central zones
0 goals · 0.53 xG · 5× in 4/4 matches
Signature: receive between the lines → turn → create or finish.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

03

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

20 tracked carries (12.0/90, 5 progressive, 237m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

5%20%15%15%5%5%5%25%5%
progressivelateral/short% of his 20 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 9m, longest 37m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
9Outside → Inside
6Inside → Inside
5Outside → Outside
First (20)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Does he carry to create or drift wide? Dribbles by channel. Season rate: 4.80 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 50%
OUTSIDE 50%
Dribble location — 4 inside · 4 outside
Right Wing
3 · 38%
Right Half-Space
3 · 38%
Central
1 · 12%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
1 · 12%
Vision AI His carries cluster wide — a drifting playmaker.
02

How does he create chances?

4 key passes (2.40/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
25%50%25%
chance creation (4)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (3)from the right (1)of 4 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
05

Where does he become vulnerable?

17 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

8
attacking third (cheap)
7
middle third
2
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 47% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.43 danger-index/90 · 0.238 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
04

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 4 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he switches it out from the central to the left hs, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the final third: 12% of his 8 touches there are lost (1 times).
—1 touch · too few—2 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—2 touches · too few—7 touches · too few—4 touches · too few—5 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—3 touches · too few12%1/8 lost—4 touches · too few—2 touches · too few0%0/8 lost—5 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

06

How & where does he defend?

17 defensive actions across the season (10.2/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
0
tackles · 0% won
0
interceptions · 0.0/90
6
recoveries · 3.6/90
1
clearances · 0.6/90
1
blocks
50
avg action height
5
won high (att 3rd)
8
middle third
4
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 6 proactive ball-wins (3.6/90), tackle success 0%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

8
attacking-half actions · 4.80/90
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

07

Impact on the Team

Napoli's output per match with David Neres (4 matches) versus without him (4 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 4 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (4)
WITHOUT (4)
Δ
goals for /match
1.75
1.50
+0.25
xG for /match
2.00
0.69
+1.31
goals against /match
1.50
1.00
+0.50
points /match
1.00
1.75
-0.75
08

His Share of the Team

Of everything Napoli produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through David Neres specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
7%
20 / 285
box entries
5%
32 / 590
zone-14 entries
4%
17 / 380
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

09

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 247 attacking mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Advanced playmaker (8)58%Half-space creator55%
Why Advanced playmaker (8) 58%: a weighted blend of creativity 61 (weight 35%) + progression 65 (weight 25%) + final-third threat 54 (weight 25%) + box threat 39 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
territory (wide vs central)
Strong
receiving zones, carrying
Average
crossing, progression, line-breaking, creativity, dribbling, final-third threat, press resistance, defensive aggression, through-balls, retention
Weak
box threat, transition, build-up, passing directness, ball-winning
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Territory (wide vs central)
86
Receiving zones
75
Carrying
72
Crossing
66
Progression
65
Line-breaking
61
Creativity
61
Dribbling
56
Final-third threat
54
Press resistance ~proxy
48
Defensive aggression
48
Through-balls ~proxy
47
Retention
44
Box threat
39
Transition ~proxy
39
Build-up
39
Passing directness
22
Ball-winning
12
10

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 176 cm / 66 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Pedro Neto Chelsea · Premier League · 174 cm / 78 kg
72%
Driven by: ball-winning (23%), territory (wide vs central) (19%), passing directness (13%). Different mechanism — Neres more via defensive aggression; Neto more via through-balls, progression.
Rio Ngumoha Liverpool · Premier League · 170 cm / 75 kg
64%
Driven by: ball-winning (28%), passing directness (14%), receiving zones (13%). Different mechanism — Neres more via crossing, defensive aggression; Ngumoha more via press resistance, dribbling.
Kamaldeen Sulemana Atalanta 25/26 · 175 cm / 70 kg
64%
Driven by: ball-winning (31%), passing directness (16%), carrying (14%). Different mechanism — Neres more via territory (wide vs central); Sulemana more via through-balls, retention.
Jadon Sancho Aston Villa · Premier League 25/26 · 180 cm / 76 kg
61%
Driven by: ball-winning (31%), crossing (12%), receiving zones (9%). Different mechanism — Neres more via defensive aggression, box threat; Sancho more via through-balls, retention.
Robert Navarro Athletic Club · La Liga · 178 cm / 65 kg
59%
Driven by: ball-winning (15%), receiving zones (15%), carrying (14%). Different mechanism — Navarro more via line-breaking, ball-winning.
Savinho Man City · Premier League · 179 cm / 66 kg
58%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (20%), passing directness (16%), carrying (14%). Different mechanism — Neres more via defensive aggression; Savinho more via through-balls, line-breaking.
11

Summary

David Neres is an advanced playmaker (8) / half-space creator: 2.40 key passes /90, 1.2 progressive passes, 0 goals from 0.53 xG. A between-the-lines creator. [Off-ball movement into pockets needs tracking.]

Based on 4 matches (150 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as an advanced playmaker (8) / half-space creator — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is box threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall advanced playmaker (8) profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report