Thin sample this season. Moise Kean has played 4 matches (171 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
Signature: Link → Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: receive / move — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn); convert — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
2 key passes (1.05/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (2)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (0)from the right (2)of 2 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
15 defensive actions across the season (7.9/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
1
tackles · 100% won
0
interceptions · 0.0/90
2
recoveries · 1.1/90
0
clearances · 0.0/90
1
blocks
62
avg action height
5
won high (att 3rd)
10
middle third
0
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 3 proactive ball-wins (1.6/90), tackle success 100%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
Defensive work in the attacking half
Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.
12
attacking-half actions · 6.32/90
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Como's output per match with Moise Kean (3 matches) versus without him (5 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 5 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (3)
WITHOUT (5)
Δ
goals for /match
2.00
1.60
+0.40
xG for /match
2.18
0.00
+2.18
goals against /match
1.33
0.60
+0.73
points /match
2.00
2.20
-0.20
05
His Share of the Team
Of everything Como produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Moise Kean specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
expected goals (xG)
18%
14.4 / 82.0
shots
13%
104 / 804
successful take-ons
6%
26 / 400
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 299 strikers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Why Poacher 63%: a weighted blend of box threat 78 (weight 55%) + press resistance 65 (weight 15%) + final-third threat 20 (weight 30%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Box threat
78
Dribbling
75
Press resistance ~proxy
65
Carrying
60
Retention
57
Build-up
36
Ball-winning
35
Through-balls ~proxy
34
Defensive aggression
33
Transition ~proxy
29
Receiving zones
22
Progression
22
Line-breaking
20
Final-third threat
20
Crossing
17
Passing directness
14
Creativity
14
Territory (wide vs central)
10
07
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 183 cm / 67 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Tasos Douvikas Como · 186 cm / 76 kg
83%
Driven by: creativity (16%), line-breaking (10%), territory (wide vs central) (10%). Different mechanism — Kean more via dribbling, through-balls; Douvikas more via passing directness.
Bamba Dieng Lorient · Ligue 1 25/26 · 178 cm / 78 kg
82%
Driven by: crossing (14%), creativity (13%), territory (wide vs central) (11%). Different mechanism — Kean more via dribbling, carrying; Dieng more via build-up.
Cristhian Stuani Girona · La Liga 25/26 · 186 cm / 76 kg
77%
Driven by: crossing (13%), creativity (11%), territory (wide vs central) (10%). Different mechanism — Kean more via carrying, through-balls; Stuani more via defensive aggression.
Rayan Fofana Le Havre · Ligue 1 · 187 cm / 74 kg
75%
Driven by: creativity (17%), crossing (14%), receiving zones (10%). Different mechanism — Fofana more via territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression.
Rodrigo Ribeiro Augsburg · Bundesliga · 185 cm / 72 kg
74%
Driven by: creativity (12%), crossing (11%), line-breaking (10%). Different mechanism — Kean more via through-balls; Ribeiro more via defensive aggression, territory (wide vs central).
Emmanuel Emegha Strasbourg · Ligue 1 25/26 · 196 cm / 82 kg
73%
Driven by: defensive aggression (12%), passing directness (10%), final-third threat (10%). Different mechanism — Kean more via defensive aggression, ball-winning; Emegha more via retention, build-up.
08
Summary
Moise Kean is a poacher / target man: 0 goals from 0.55 xG (-0.55 vs expected), 6 shots, 2 box entries. Under-performing his chances. [Off-ball runs, aerials and hold-up under contact need tracking/aerial data.]
Based on 4 matches (171 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a poacher / target man — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is final-third threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall poacher profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
← BACK TO SEARCH
