العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026

Boubacar Kamara

Aston Villa
Ball-winning 6 (destroyer) DM
17.2 defensive actions/90
Capability Analysis
Breaking Pressure51%vs 20 defensive mids
"Can he retain and progress the ball while his own team is being pressed?"
Retention under pressure86.0%80%
Progressive passes while pressed1120%
Line-breaking passes while pressed350%
Progressive carries while pressed418%
Threat added while pressed (xT)3.27xT85%
Progression46%vs 23 defensive mids
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /902.9526%
Line-breaking passes /901.1735%
Threat added by passing /901.0xT43%
Pass accuracy87.72%78%
Ball-Winning48%vs 23 defensive mids
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /900.9735%
Ball recoveries /903.889%
Tackles /902.3461%
Duels won /901.8287%
defensive midtempo controllerpress resistancescreening
752
minutes
8 apps
361
passes
87% completed
87%
pass completion
361 passes
29
progressive passes
3.5/90
144
defensive actions
17.2/90
27
tackles + interceptions
67% tackle win
31
recoveries
3.7/90
18
line-breaking passes
2.2/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
drop between the centre-backs — mostly in the middle third (59% of his 361 passes)
87% completion · 361× in 8/8 matches
↓
ESCAPE PRESSURE
turn out of a tight central area
36% won · 14× in 7/8 matches
↓
PROGRESS CENTRAL
break a line through the middle
3.5 prog/90 · 18× in 6/8 matches
↓
SCREEN / WIN BALL
protect the back four
6.9 ball-wins/90 · 58× in 8/8 matches
↓
RECYCLE / PROGRESS
keep it ticking, feed the final third
4.1 f3-entries/90 · 34× in 6/8 matches
Signature: drop to receive → escape the press on the turn → progress centrally or recycle → screen the counter. Block the central lane and press his first touch to force him backwards.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
45
passes / match
17.2
def actions / 90
24–97
pass range (matches)
19
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (24 at the low end, 97 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

10

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

62 tracked carries (7.4/90, 6 progressive, 450m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

2%6%18%11%11%11%21%10%5%2%2%2%
progressivelateral/short% of his 62 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 6m, longest 24m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
4Outside → Inside
51Inside → Inside
4Outside → Outside
3Inside → Outside
First (25)Second (17)Third (16)Fourth (4)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

21
tackle duels
14
won
7
beaten · 33%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 76%
OUTSIDE 24%
Tackle-duel location — 16 inside · 5 outside
Right Wing
5 · 24%
Right Half-Space
7 · 33%
Central
7 · 33%
Left Half-Space
2 · 10%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 7 of 21 tackle duels (33% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Can he escape pressure on the ball? His carries/dribbles in tight central areas, by channel. Season rate: 1.68 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 86%
OUTSIDE 14%
Dribble location — 12 inside · 2 outside
Right Wing
2 · 14%
Right Half-Space
8 · 57%
Central
4 · 29%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI 86% of his carries are central — he receives and turns in congested midfield zones rather than out wide.
02

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

14%
vertical passes
20×
3%
switches
5×
26%
carries
38×
57%
short circulation
85×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW3658%2133%128%3RHS12328%3434%4233%404%52%2C12113%1619%2334%4128%346%7LHS277%222%641%1130%8LW714%186%6FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right wing in the middle third → the right half-space in the middle third — 3 progressive passes (14% of his progression) at 0.011 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 43% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 10% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 4% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 8 line-breaking passes and 34 final-third entries, 2.0 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
1%8%8%16%9%0%2%9%16%16%6%0%0%2%1%4%1%0%
completedincomplete361 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
361
passes
87%
completed
47
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 87% season completion rate.
04

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

29
progressive · 3.5/90
34
final-third entries · 4.1/90
6
box entries · 0.72/90
12
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
11

How does he create chances?

3 key passes (0.36/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
33%33%33%
chance creation (3)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
05

Where does he become vulnerable?

56 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

12
attacking third (cheap)
28
middle third
16
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 21% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.66 danger-index/90 · 0.397 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
06

What is his passing profile?

361
passes attempted
39%
mostly sideways
61%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
135 · 37%
Sideways
139 · 39%
Backward
87 · 24%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
191 · 61%
Medium
107 · 34%
Long (>30m)
16 · 5%
07

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.370.360.340.290.270.21
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.37
Right Wing Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.36
Central Mid third → Central Att third
2 passes
0.34
Central Att third → Right Half-Space Att third
2 passes
0.29
Central Mid third → Left Wing Att third
3 passes
0.27
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.21
Central Def third → Central Mid third
3 passes
08

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Boubacar Kamara gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
23%
Primary
Central, Middle third
23%
Secondary
Right Half-Space, Middle third
9%
Third
Central, Defensive third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
09

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Boubacar Kamara actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
182134163560572334333359341
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%8%8%16%9%0%2%9%16%16%6%0%0%2%1%4%1%0%
own goal left, attacking →
12

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

3Key pass
2Cross
29Progressive
18Long ball
8Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
16Outside → Inside
204Inside → Inside
27Outside → Outside
67Inside → Outside
By direction
135Forward
87Backward
139Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays inside from the right wing toward the right hs, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 passes worth 0.37 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 3 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right wing toward the central, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 40% of his 10 touches there are lost (4 times).
40%4/10 lost10%3/29 lost12%4/33 lost22%2/9 lost—2 touches · too few25%6/24 lost5%4/84 lost14%12/85 lost12%2/17 lost—3 touches · too few8%1/13 lost26%6/23 lost10%2/21 lost—5 touches · too few—3 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

144 defensive actions across the season (17.2/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
21
tackles · 67% won
6
interceptions · 0.7/90
31
recoveries · 3.7/90
19
clearances · 2.3/90
7
blocks
37
avg action height
19
won high (att 3rd)
52
middle third
73
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 58 proactive ball-wins (6.9/90), tackle success 67%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
14

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Boubacar Kamara still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 2.7, 2m)
87%
1.4
0.9
0.52
Mid press (PPDA 3.3, 2m)
85%
5.0
2.5
0.76
Low press (PPDA 5.1, 4m)
88%
3.8
2.6
1.04
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Boubacar Kamara played nearly every Aston Villa match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Aston Villa produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Boubacar Kamara specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
zone-14 entries
8%
31 / 377
tackles
8%
58 / 731
interceptions
7%
24 / 348
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 258 defensive mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Tempo controller68%Deep-lying playmaker65%Ball-winning 644%
Why Tempo controller 68%: a weighted blend of retention 69 (weight 35%) + build-up 68 (weight 30%) + press resistance 56 (weight 20%) + progression 55 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
through-balls, receiving zones, crossing
Average
retention, build-up, final-third threat, creativity, dribbling, line-breaking, press resistance, passing directness, progression, carrying, defensive aggression, transition
Weak
ball-winning, box threat, territory (wide vs central)
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Through-balls ~proxy
82
Receiving zones
81
Crossing
74
Retention
69
Build-up
68
Final-third threat
62
Creativity
60
Dribbling
59
Line-breaking
58
Press resistance ~proxy
56
Passing directness
56
Progression
55
Carrying
53
Defensive aggression
46
Transition ~proxy
41
Ball-winning
39
Box threat
27
Territory (wide vs central)
16
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 184 cm / 68 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Ellyes Skhiri Koln · Bundesliga · 185 cm / 74 kg
67%
Driven by: build-up (19%), receiving zones (14%), retention (13%). Different mechanism — Skhiri more via carrying, transition.
Youri Regeer Werder Bremen · Bundesliga · 177 cm / 68 kg
65%
Driven by: crossing (19%), build-up (12%), retention (12%). Different mechanism — Regeer more via line-breaking, ball-winning.
Nicolò Rovella Lazio · Serie A · 179 cm / 66 kg
63%
Driven by: receiving zones (15%), crossing (12%), box threat (12%). Different mechanism — Rovella more via progression, press resistance.
Oussama El Azzouzi Bologna · Serie A · 189 cm / 82 kg
59%
Driven by: receiving zones (21%), crossing (16%), build-up (13%). Different mechanism — Kamara more via passing directness, defensive aggression; Azzouzi more via territory (wide vs central), creativity.
Samir El Mourabet Strasbourg · Ligue 1 · 187 cm / 72 kg
56%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (22%), build-up (15%), retention (13%). Different mechanism — Kamara more via passing directness; Mourabet more via ball-winning, press resistance.
Leon Avdullahu Hoffenheim · Bundesliga · 185 cm / 79 kg
54%
Driven by: receiving zones (22%), build-up (15%), box threat (14%). Different mechanism — Kamara more via dribbling, through-balls; Avdullahu more via transition, progression.
20

Summary

Boubacar Kamara is a tempo controller / deep-lying playmaker: 87% completion, 18 line-breaks and 3.5 progressive passes /90, resisting pressure with 36% dribble success. A central controller. [Off-ball screening position and scanning need tracking data.]

Based on 8 matches (752 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a tempo controller / deep-lying playmaker — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall tempo controller profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report