العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportSerie A 2026

Emanuele Valeri

Parma Calcio 1913
Advanced playmaker CM
2.62 key passes/90 · 1.07 xT/90
Capability Analysis
Successful Dribble34%vs 34 central mids
"Can he beat a man in a straight 1v1?"
Successful take-ons /900.5135%
Take-on success37.04%32%
Progression54%vs 34 central mids
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /906.2579%
Line-breaking passes /902.0668%
Threat added by passing /901.26xT71%
Pass accuracy62.3%0%
Ball-Carrying38%vs 34 central mids
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /904.3259%
Carry distance /9074.13m24%
Successful take-ons /900.5135%
Take-on success37.04%32%
Chance Creation62%vs 34 central mids
"Does he create real chances for others?"
Expected assists /900.16xA88%
Through balls /900.00%
Threat added by passing /901.26xT71%
Box entries (pass) /902.7291%
central midadvanced playmaker (8)progressionbox-to-box
756
minutes
8 apps
25
progressive passes
3.0/90
64%
pass completion
292 passes
22
key passes
2.62/90
17
box entries
2.02/90
10
final-3rd entries
1.2/90
12
dribbles
42% won
112
possessions lost
3.42 danger/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Left Wing, Middle third — mostly in the attacking third (45% of his 292 passes)
64% completion · 292× in 8/8 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive or pass into the final third
3.0 prog/90 · 25× in 7/8 matches
↓
ARRIVE
get into the box late
22 key passes · 17× in 5/8 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
2.62 key passes /90 · 0 goals · 25× in 7/8 matches
Signature: receive → progress → arrive in the box → create or finish. A box-to-box midfielder judged across every phase.
20

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
36
passes / match
2.0
dribbles / match
25–58
pass range (matches)
1–4
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (25 at the low end, 58 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

09

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

57 tracked carries (6.8/90, 25 progressive, 641m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

2%4%2%21%14%11%39%9%
progressivelateral/short% of his 57 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 9m, longest 47m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
7Outside → Inside
10Inside → Inside
35Outside → Outside
5Inside → Outside
First (26)Second (19)Third (10)Fourth (2)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Emanuele Valeri's signature is the dribble. Does he carry outside (down the left wing) or inside (into the half-space / centre)? Every dribble classified by channel. Season rate: 1.43 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 25%
OUTSIDE 75%
Dribble location — 3 inside · 9 outside
Right Wing
2 · 17%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
0 · 0%
Left Half-Space
3 · 25%
Left Wing
7 · 58%
Vision AI 75% of his dribbles are in the wide left lane — he attacks the full-back on the outside, then threatens to cut inside onto his right foot.
12

How does he build & move the ball?

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW922%222%233%322%2RHS1100%1C4100%4LHS3611%436%1344%168%3LW1371%11%211%1527%3760%82FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the left wing in the final third → the left half-space in the final third — 11 progressive passes (21% of his progression) at 0.243 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 74% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 0% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

12% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.

Quality behind the volume: 22 line-breaking passes and 10 final-third entries, 9.0 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
1%1%5%0%1%0%2%2%0%4%11%23%13%21%15%
completedincomplete292 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
292
passes
64%
completed
105
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 64% season completion rate.
05

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

25
progressive · 3.0/90
10
final-third entries · 1.2/90
17
box entries · 2.02/90
23
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
03

How does he create chances?

22 key passes (2.62/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
5%5%5%35%50%
chance creation (20)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
06

Where does he become vulnerable?

112 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

65
attacking third (cheap)
27
middle third
20
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 58% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 3.42 danger-index/90 · 0.256 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
13

What is his passing profile?

292
passes attempted
42%
mostly forward
51%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
122 · 42%
Sideways
98 · 34%
Backward
72 · 25%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
95 · 51%
Medium
71 · 38%
Long (>30m)
21 · 11%
11

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.990.540.420.390.360.33
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.99
Left Wing Att third → Left Half-Space Att third
3 passes
0.54
Left Half-Space Att third → Right Half-Space Att third
2 passes
0.42
Left Half-Space Att third → Central Att third
2 passes · 1 to a shot
0.39
Left Wing Mid third → Left Half-Space Att third
2 passes
0.36
Right Wing Att third → Central Att third
1 passes · 1 to a shot
0.33
Left Wing Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
2 passes
07

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Emanuele Valeri gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
29%
Primary
Left Wing, Middle third
28%
Secondary
Left Wing, Attacking third
11%
Third
Left Wing, Defensive third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
08

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Emanuele Valeri actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
1233674064491415812416
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%1%5%0%1%0%2%2%0%4%11%23%13%21%15%
own goal left, attacking →
15

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

22Key pass
24Cross
13Cutback
25Progressive
59Long ball
16Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
61Outside → Inside
38Inside → Inside
85Outside → Outside
3Inside → Outside
By direction
122Forward
72Backward
98Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays inside from the left wing toward the left hs in the final third — 3 passes worth 0.99 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 22 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the left wing toward the central in the final third — 6 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left half-space in the defensive third: 50% of his 14 touches there are lost (7 times).
—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—3 touches · too few50%7/14 lost36%12/33 lost—1 touch · too few—2 touches · too few—2 touches · too few29%6/21 lost17%15/86 lost50%9/18 lost—1 touch · too few—6 touches · too few44%11/25 lost44%35/80 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
04

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 57 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he drives along the touchline (61%). He carries from outside into the middle 7 times and out toward the touchline 5 — a genuine inside forward who cuts in with the ball.
10

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
1 · 2%
Progressive / key pass
10 · 18%
Simple pass
21 · 37%
No clean link
25 · 44%
Of 57 carries, 2% flow straight into a shot of his own, 18% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 44% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
14

Crosses & Cutbacks

24 crosses (2.86/90, 12 completed) and 13 cutbacks (1.55/90, 8 completed) — two separate wide-delivery patterns into the box, each its own map with a completed/failed filter. Neither is a tagged event, so both are inferred from pass geometry — the intended end point of a failed attempt is still real data (an interception doesn’t erase where the ball was aimed): a cross is a pass aimed into the box starting from a wide channel; a cutback starts almost on the byline but is squared back rather than driven forward, aimed centrally around the box. The completed-cross count was checked against this platform’s own real match-level cross totals and lands within about 1 cross of the true count.

Crosses — close-up on the final third
Cutbacks — close-up on the final third
completedfailed (dashed)close-up on the box — attacking ↑ toward goal
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

16

How & where does he defend?

83 defensive actions across the season (9.9/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
12
tackles · 42% won
6
interceptions · 0.7/90
27
recoveries · 3.2/90
14
clearances · 1.7/90
6
blocks
33
avg action height
9
won high (att 3rd)
29
middle third
45
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 45 proactive ball-wins (5.4/90), tackle success 42%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
17

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Emanuele Valeri keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 3.4, 2m)
1.24
2.8
1.88
0%
Mid press (PPDA 3.9, 2m)
0.60
0.5
1.43
25%
Low press (PPDA 5.2, 4m)
1.70
4.3
3.60
57%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

18

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Emanuele Valeri played nearly every Parma Calcio 1913 match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

19

His Share of the Team

Of everything Parma Calcio 1913 produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Emanuele Valeri specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
box entries
33%
107 / 329
expected assists (xA)
22%
6.3 / 28.8
progressive passes
20%
246 / 1259
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

21

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 383 central mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Advanced playmaker (8)58%Box-to-box runner47%Transition runner31%Deep-lying playmaker31%
Why Advanced playmaker (8) 58%: a weighted blend of progression 75 (weight 25%) + creativity 51 (weight 35%) + final-third threat 62 (weight 25%) + box threat 33 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
through-balls, territory (wide vs central)
Strong
line-breaking, progression, passing directness
Average
final-third threat, crossing, transition, creativity, carrying, ball-winning, dribbling
Weak
box threat, press resistance, build-up, receiving zones, defensive aggression, retention
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Through-balls ~proxy
95
Territory (wide vs central)
93
Line-breaking
77
Progression
75
Passing directness
70
Final-third threat
62
Crossing
61
Transition ~proxy
53
Creativity
51
Carrying
47
Ball-winning
41
Dribbling
41
Box threat
33
Press resistance ~proxy
29
Build-up
24
Receiving zones
22
Defensive aggression
16
Retention
10
22

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 180 cm / 78 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Cristiano Biraghi Torino · 185 cm / 78 kg
88%
Driven by: defensive aggression (15%), retention (12%), through-balls (11%). Different mechanism — Valeri more via dribbling, carrying; Biraghi more via passing directness.
Aarón Martín Racing Santander · 180 cm / 72 kg
85%
Driven by: through-balls (15%), territory (wide vs central) (14%), defensive aggression (14%).
Samuele Angori Pisa 25/26 · 186 cm / 77 kg
84%
Driven by: defensive aggression (17%), retention (16%), receiving zones (12%). Different mechanism — Valeri more via carrying, line-breaking.
Christopher Trimmel Union Berlin · Bundesliga · 189 cm / 82 kg
83%
Driven by: retention (16%), press resistance (14%), through-balls (12%). Different mechanism — Valeri more via dribbling, press resistance; Trimmel more via final-third threat, build-up.
Ricardo Mangas Monza · 181 cm / 73 kg
82%
Driven by: retention (16%), through-balls (15%), territory (wide vs central) (14%). Different mechanism — Mangas more via box threat, receiving zones.
Samuele Birindelli Monza · 175 cm / 68 kg
76%
Driven by: defensive aggression (14%), press resistance (13%), retention (13%). Different mechanism — Valeri more via dribbling; Birindelli more via box threat, receiving zones.
23

Summary

Emanuele Valeri is an advanced playmaker (8): 3.0 progressive passes, 2.62 key passes /90, 17 box entries, 0 goals from 0.14 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.

Based on 8 matches (756 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as an advanced playmaker (8) — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is box threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall advanced playmaker (8) profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report