العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLigue 1 2026

Michaël Cuisance

Lens
Ball-winning 6 (destroyer) DM
14.9 defensive actions/90
Capability Analysis
Breaking Pressure
only 15 pressured-passing actions across 1 high-press match -- not enough sample (needs 5+ matches and 12+ actions)
Progression34%vs 31 central mids
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /902.3623%
Line-breaking passes /900.7310%
Threat added by passing /900.66xT19%
Pass accuracy89.95%84%
Ball-Winning59%vs 31 central mids
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /901.2777%
Ball recoveries /906.1790%
Tackles /902.068%
Duels won /900.00%
defensive midball-winning 6press resistancescreening
496
minutes
7 apps
219
passes
90% completed
90%
pass completion
219 passes
18
progressive passes
3.3/90
82
defensive actions
14.9/90
18
tackles + interceptions
45% tackle win
34
recoveries
6.2/90
13
line-breaking passes
2.4/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
drop between the centre-backs — mostly in the middle third (66% of his 219 passes)
90% completion · 219× in 7/7 matches
↓
ESCAPE PRESSURE
turn out of a tight central area
36% won · 14× in 4/7 matches
↓
PROGRESS CENTRAL
break a line through the middle
3.3 prog/90 · 13× in 6/7 matches
↓
SCREEN / WIN BALL
protect the back four
9.4 ball-wins/90 · 52× in 7/7 matches
↓
RECYCLE / PROGRESS
keep it ticking, feed the final third
4.2 f3-entries/90 · 23× in 5/7 matches
Signature: drop to receive → escape the press on the turn → progress centrally or recycle → screen the counter. Block the central lane and press his first touch to force him backwards.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
31
passes / match
14.9
def actions / 90
15–52
pass range (matches)
4
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (15 at the low end, 52 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

10

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

68 tracked carries (12.3/90, 11 progressive, 617m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

6%16%18%7%1%4%22%6%6%1%3%1%3%4%
progressivelateral/short% of his 68 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 34m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
7Outside → Inside
47Inside → Inside
10Outside → Outside
4Inside → Outside
First (23)Second (23)Third (16)Fourth (6)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

11
tackle duels
5
won
6
beaten · 55%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 73%
OUTSIDE 27%
Tackle-duel location — 8 inside · 3 outside
Right Wing
1 · 9%
Right Half-Space
4 · 36%
Central
3 · 27%
Left Half-Space
1 · 9%
Left Wing
2 · 18%
Vision AI beaten in 6 of 11 tackle duels (55% loss rate) — a real defensive leak worth flagging.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Can he escape pressure on the ball? His carries/dribbles in tight central areas, by channel. Season rate: 2.54 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 64%
OUTSIDE 36%
Dribble location — 9 inside · 5 outside
Right Wing
2 · 14%
Right Half-Space
5 · 36%
Central
4 · 29%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
3 · 21%
Vision AI 64% of his carries are central — he receives and turns in congested midfield zones rather than out wide.
03

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

12%
vertical passes
12×
3%
switches
3×
37%
carries
36×
47%
short circulation
46×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW3667%2428%106%2RHS7037%2631%2220%149%63%2C504%216%846%2318%916%8LHS323%13%131%1044%1419%6LW956%544%4FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right half-space in the final third → the right half-space in the final third — 2 progressive passes (15% of his progression) at 0.067 xT each. He keeps it in the same lane.

Inward (31%) and outward (23%) progression are balanced — no strong lane bias.

Only 8% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 4 line-breaking passes and 23 final-third entries, -0.6 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
0%4%16%16%8%2%0%7%13%9%5%0%1%7%6%5%1%
completedincomplete219 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
219
passes
90%
completed
22
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 90% season completion rate.
04

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

18
progressive · 3.3/90
23
final-third entries · 4.2/90
1
box entries · 0.18/90
12
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
11

How does he create chances?

5 key passes (0.91/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
20%40%20%20%
chance creation (5)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
05

Where does he become vulnerable?

31 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

16
attacking third (cheap)
12
middle third
3
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 52% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.54 danger-index/90 · 0.273 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
06

What is his passing profile?

219
passes attempted
36%
mostly backward
54%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
77 · 35%
Sideways
63 · 29%
Backward
79 · 36%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
106 · 54%
Medium
78 · 40%
Long (>30m)
13 · 7%
07

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.410.290.200.150.110.11
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.41
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Wing Att third
3 passes · 2 to a shot
0.29
Right Half-Space Att third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.20
Central Mid third → Left Wing Att third
3 passes
0.15
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.11
Left Half-Space Def third → Left Wing Mid third
1 passes
0.11
Central Mid third → Right Wing Att third
1 passes
08

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Michaël Cuisance gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
24%
Primary
Right Half-Space, Middle third
16%
Secondary
Central, Middle third
12%
Third
Right Wing, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
09

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Michaël Cuisance actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
215131421173020154183537205
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

0%4%16%16%8%2%0%7%13%9%5%0%1%7%6%5%1%
own goal left, attacking →
12

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

5Key pass
18Progressive
13Long ball
8Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
17Outside → Inside
107Inside → Inside
28Outside → Outside
45Inside → Outside
By direction
77Forward
79Backward
63Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches it out from the right hs to the right wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 3 passes worth 0.41 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 5 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he switches it out from the right hs to the right wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 2 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left half-space in the final third: 33% of his 9 touches there are lost (3 times).
—3 touches · too few12%1/8 lost8%1/12 lost—5 touches · too few—0 touches · too few0%0/26 lost5%3/55 lost9%3/34 lost12%3/24 lost—6 touches · too few—7 touches · too few31%5/16 lost11%1/9 lost33%3/9 lost—5 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

82 defensive actions across the season (14.9/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
11
tackles · 45% won
7
interceptions · 1.3/90
34
recoveries · 6.2/90
4
clearances · 0.7/90
5
blocks
46
avg action height
13
won high (att 3rd)
49
middle third
20
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 52 proactive ball-wins (9.4/90), tackle success 45%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
14

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Michaël Cuisance still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-3 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 5.1, 2m)
91%
3.9
1.3
0.61
Mid press (PPDA 5.8, 2m)
88%
2.6
3.2
0.71
Low press (PPDA 8.1, 3m)
90%
3.3
2.5
0.67
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Lens's output per match with Michaël Cuisance (7 matches) versus without him (1 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 1 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (7)
WITHOUT (1)
Δ
goals against /match
1.57
1.00
+0.57
points /match
1.43
3.00
-1.57
goals for /match
1.86
3.00
-1.14
xG for /match
1.69
1.37
+0.32
16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Lens produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Michaël Cuisance specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
3%
5 / 195
ball recoveries
3%
34 / 1329
final-third entries
2%
30 / 1215
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 258 defensive mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Ball-winning 670%Tempo controller64%Deep-lying playmaker57%
Why Ball-winning 6 70%: a weighted blend of ball-winning 61 (weight 40%) + defensive aggression 77 (weight 30%) + retention 77 (weight 15%) + progression 39 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
defensive aggression, box threat, retention, carrying
Average
dribbling, ball-winning, press resistance, transition, creativity, build-up, crossing, final-third threat
Weak
receiving zones, progression, territory (wide vs central), through-balls, line-breaking, passing directness
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Defensive aggression
77
Box threat
77
Retention
77
Carrying
70
Dribbling
64
Ball-winning
61
Press resistance ~proxy
61
Transition ~proxy
55
Creativity
54
Build-up
54
Crossing
50
Final-third threat
46
Receiving zones
39
Progression
39
Territory (wide vs central)
37
Through-balls ~proxy
35
Line-breaking
29
Passing directness
10
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 181 cm / 74 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Dani Lorenzo Malaga · La Liga · 176 cm / 68 kg
71%
Driven by: passing directness (20%), retention (14%), line-breaking (11%). Different mechanism — Cuisance more via box threat, through-balls; Lorenzo more via dribbling, press resistance.
Boubacar Traoré Metz 25/26 · 183 cm / 67 kg
69%
Driven by: passing directness (17%), defensive aggression (11%), line-breaking (11%). Different mechanism — Cuisance more via final-third threat, creativity; Traoré more via dribbling, press resistance.
Ludovit Reis Werder Bremen · Bundesliga · 178 cm / 78 kg
69%
Driven by: passing directness (22%), retention (14%), line-breaking (13%). Different mechanism — Cuisance more via dribbling, crossing.
Carlos Baleba Man Utd · Premier League · 179 cm / 73 kg
64%
Driven by: passing directness (24%), defensive aggression (14%), line-breaking (10%). Different mechanism — Cuisance more via final-third threat, creativity.
Manuel Ugarte Man Utd · Premier League 25/26 · 182 cm / 77 kg
63%
Driven by: passing directness (17%), ball-winning (12%), retention (11%). Different mechanism — Cuisance more via defensive aggression; Ugarte more via territory (wide vs central), ball-winning.
Pape Matar Sarr Juventus · Serie A · 185 cm / 80 kg
60%
Driven by: defensive aggression (16%), carrying (15%), retention (14%). Different mechanism — Sarr more via receiving zones, creativity.
20

Summary

Michaël Cuisance is a ball-winning 6 / tempo controller: 90% completion, 13 line-breaks and 3.3 progressive passes /90, resisting pressure with 36% dribble success. A central controller. [Off-ball screening position and scanning need tracking data.]

Based on 7 matches (496 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a ball-winning 6 / tempo controller — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-winning 6 profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report