العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026

Pau Torres

Aston Villa
Ball-playing centre-back CB
6.7 progressive passes/90 · 0.3 line-breaking/90
centre-backball-playing centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
310
minutes
5 apps
171
passes
82% completed
82%
pass completion
171 passes
23
progressive passes
6.7/90
23
line-breaking passes
6.7/90
42
defensive actions
12.2/90
3
tackles + interceptions
0% tackle win
13
clearances
3.8/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Pau Torres has played 5 matches (310 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the defensive third (58% of his 171 passes)
82% completion · 171× in 5/5 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
6.7 prog/90 · 23× in 4/5 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
2.6/90 · 9× in 4/5 matches
Signature: Receive → Break A Line → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: carry out — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); switch play — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
16

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
34
passes / match
12.2
def actions / 90
7–60
pass range (matches)
13
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (7 at the low end, 60 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

07

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

53 tracked carries (15.4/90, 12 progressive, 538m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

13%8%25%21%19%15%
progressivelateral/short% of his 53 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 35m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
8Outside → Inside
32Inside → Inside
4Outside → Outside
9Inside → Outside
First (15)Second (15)Third (15)Fourth (8)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

1
tackle duels
0
won
1
beaten · 100%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 100%
OUTSIDE 0%
Tackle-duel location — 1 inside · 0 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
1 · 100%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 1 of 1 tackle duels (100% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 0 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

02

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

19%
vertical passes
22×
2%
switches
2×
38%
carries
45×
42%
short circulation
49×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW0RHS250%150%1C425%233%1460%252%1LHS791%13%261%4816%1319%15LW1817%356%1028%5FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the left half-space in the middle third → the left half-space in the middle third — 5 progressive passes (33% of his progression) at 0.063 xT each. He keeps it in the same lane.

His progression is inward: 33% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 20% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 4% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 1 line-breaking passes and 9 final-third entries, 1.7 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
1%1%11%12%12%3%13%23%13%11%1%1%
completedincomplete171 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
171
passes
82%
completed
30
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 82% season completion rate.
04

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

23
progressive · 6.7/90
9
final-third entries · 2.6/90
0
box entries · 0.00/90
19
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

How does he create chances?

0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
09

Where does he become vulnerable?

30 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

2
attacking third (cheap)
5
middle third
23
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 7% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 5.73 danger-index/90 · 0.658 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
08

What is his passing profile?

171
passes attempted
41%
mostly forward
57%
mostly medium
Direction
Forward
70 · 41%
Sideways
54 · 32%
Backward
47 · 27%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
55 · 39%
Medium
80 · 57%
Long (>30m)
6 · 4%
10

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.400.310.210.180.150.15
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.40
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Half-Space Mid third
4 passes
0.31
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Att third
2 passes
0.21
Central Def third → Central Mid third
3 passes
0.18
Left Half-Space Def third → Left Half-Space Mid third
2 passes
0.15
Left Half-Space Mid third → Right Wing Att third
1 passes
0.15
Left Wing Mid third → Left Wing Mid third
2 passes
05

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Pau Torres gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
26%
Primary
Left Half-Space, Defensive third
24%
Secondary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
19%
Third
Central, Defensive third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
06

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Pau Torres actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
2339221921182020511
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%1%11%12%12%3%13%23%13%11%1%1%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

23Progressive
23Long ball
2Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
13Outside → Inside
104Inside → Inside
5Outside → Outside
19Inside → Outside
By direction
70Forward
47Backward
54Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the left hs in the middle third — 4 passes worth 0.40 xT.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 73% of his 22 touches there are lost (16 times).
—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few9%3/33 lost9%4/45 lost73%16/22 lost—0 touches · too few—3 touches · too few0%0/12 lost7%3/41 lost8%1/12 lost—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—1 touch · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

42 defensive actions across the season (12.2/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
1
tackles · 0% won
2
interceptions · 0.6/90
13
recoveries · 3.8/90
13
clearances · 3.8/90
0
blocks
25
avg action height
3
won high (att 3rd)
10
middle third
29
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 16 proactive ball-wins (4.6/90), tackle success 0%. He defends deep, protecting his box — a last-line stopper.
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

14

Impact on the Team

Aston Villa's output per match with Pau Torres (5 matches) versus without him (3 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 3 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (5)
WITHOUT (3)
Δ
goals against /match
1.60
1.33
+0.27
points /match
1.20
1.67
-0.47
goals for /match
0.80
1.67
-0.87
xG for /match
0.74
1.00
-0.26
15

His Share of the Team

Of everything Aston Villa produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Pau Torres specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
clearances
7%
76 / 1034
final-third entries
7%
131 / 1901
threat added by passing (xT)
6%
27.9 / 459.0
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

17

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 513 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Ball-playing centre-back70%Stopper centre-back31%
Why Ball-playing centre-back 70%: a weighted blend of progression 77 (weight 25%) + build-up 63 (weight 30%) + retention 62 (weight 30%) + press resistance 57 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
carrying
Strong
transition, progression, creativity
Average
receiving zones, final-third threat, build-up, dribbling, retention, press resistance, line-breaking, territory (wide vs central), passing directness
Weak
ball-winning, crossing, box threat, defensive aggression, through-balls
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Carrying
93
Transition ~proxy
78
Progression
77
Creativity
75
Receiving zones
66
Final-third threat
63
Build-up
63
Dribbling
62
Retention
62
Press resistance ~proxy
57
Line-breaking
49
Territory (wide vs central)
48
Passing directness
44
Ball-winning
36
Crossing
29
Box threat
28
Defensive aggression
20
Through-balls ~proxy
18
18

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 192 cm / 81 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Alessandro Circati Parma Calcio 1913 · Serie A 25/26 · 190 cm / 85 kg
75%
Driven by: creativity (19%), defensive aggression (18%), crossing (11%). Different mechanism — Torres more via carrying, transition; Circati more via line-breaking.
Edmond Tapsoba Leverkusen · Bundesliga · 192 cm / 84 kg
72%
Driven by: transition (22%), carrying (21%), progression (11%). Different mechanism — Tapsoba more via box threat, line-breaking.
Luca Jaquez Stuttgart · Bundesliga · 187 cm / 80 kg
71%
Driven by: carrying (18%), defensive aggression (13%), box threat (10%). Different mechanism — Torres more via creativity, passing directness; Jaquez more via crossing, retention.
Marin Pongracic Fiorentina · Serie A · 193 cm / 95 kg
70%
Driven by: carrying (25%), transition (19%), defensive aggression (18%). Different mechanism — Torres more via creativity, territory (wide vs central); Pongracic more via through-balls, dribbling.
Renato Veiga Villarreal · La Liga · 188 cm / 88 kg
70%
Driven by: defensive aggression (28%), carrying (13%), transition (13%). Different mechanism — Torres more via dribbling, carrying; Veiga more via passing directness, through-balls.
Oliver Provstgaard Lazio · Serie A · 194 cm / 70 kg
69%
Driven by: carrying (18%), transition (15%), creativity (15%). Different mechanism — Torres more via territory (wide vs central), dribbling; Provstgaard more via passing directness, crossing.
19

Summary

Pau Torres is a ball-playing centre-back: 82% pass completion, 23 line-breaking passes and 6.7 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 5 matches (310 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a ball-playing centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is press resistance — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-playing centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report