Thin sample this season. Omar Alderete has played 3 matches (131 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (59% of his 75 passes)
76% completion · 75× in 3/3 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
7.6 prog/90 · 13× in 3/3 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 3× in 1/3 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
5.5/90 · 8× in 3/3 matches
Signature: Receive → Break A Line → Switch Play → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: carry out — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
23 tracked carries (15.8/90, 6 progressive, 194m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.
progressivelateral/short% of his 23 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 19m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
First (23)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →
Beaten in the tackle
How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
0 · 0%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI too few tackle duels this season to read a pattern.
He attempted only 0 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.
05
How does he create chances?
0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
03
Where does he become vulnerable?
18 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.
1
attacking third (cheap)
9
middle third
8
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 6% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 6.50 danger-index/90 · 0.526 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
02
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays inside from the left wing toward the left hs, advancing it forward in the defensive third — 2 passes worth 0.22 xT.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left half-space in the defensive third: 36% of his 11 touches there are lost (4 times).
22 defensive actions across the season (15.1/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
0
tackles · 0% won
1
interceptions · 0.7/90
6
recoveries · 4.1/90
7
clearances · 4.8/90
0
blocks
32
avg action height
3
won high (att 3rd)
5
middle third
14
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 7 proactive ball-wins (4.8/90), tackle success 0%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Sunderland's output per match with Omar Alderete (3 matches) versus without him (5 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 5 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (3)
WITHOUT (5)
Δ
goals against /match
1.33
2.00
-0.67
points /match
0.33
0.80
-0.47
goals for /match
0.33
1.00
-0.67
xG for /match
0.64
1.87
-1.23
08
His Share of the Team
Of everything Sunderland produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Omar Alderete specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
clearances
15%
226 / 1552
interceptions
9%
37 / 407
threat added by passing (xT)
7%
31.8 / 472.1
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 513 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Ball-playing centre-back48%Stopper centre-back40%
Why Ball-playing centre-back 48%: a weighted blend of progression 66 (weight 25%) + build-up 41 (weight 30%) + retention 36 (weight 30%) + press resistance 63 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Dribbling
86
Passing directness
82
Carrying
81
Line-breaking
74
Transition ~proxy
73
Through-balls ~proxy
66
Progression
66
Press resistance ~proxy
63
Crossing
63
Territory (wide vs central)
61
Box threat
59
Receiving zones
53
Creativity
51
Defensive aggression
47
Final-third threat
46
Build-up
41
Ball-winning
37
Retention
36
10
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 188 cm / 77 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Clément Lenglet Atletico · La Liga 25/26 · 186 cm / 81 kg
67%
Driven by: carrying (22%), transition (19%), passing directness (17%). Different mechanism — Alderete more via box threat, dribbling; Lenglet more via final-third threat, retention.
Clément Akpa Auxerre · Ligue 1 · 181 cm / 68 kg
65%
Driven by: dribbling (18%), passing directness (15%), line-breaking (11%). Different mechanism — Alderete more via carrying, box threat; Akpa more via final-third threat, through-balls.
Lautaro Valenti Parma Calcio 1913 · Serie A · 188 cm / 80 kg
64%
Driven by: dribbling (23%), passing directness (14%), retention (12%). Different mechanism — Alderete more via carrying, transition; Valenti more via final-third threat, through-balls.
Nico Schlotterbeck Borussia Dortmund · Bundesliga · 191 cm / 81 kg
63%
Driven by: transition (17%), dribbling (17%), carrying (14%). Different mechanism — Schlotterbeck more via final-third threat, receiving zones.
Ismaëlo Ganiou Lens · Ligue 1 · 191 cm / 80 kg
61%
Driven by: transition (20%), dribbling (17%), carrying (16%). Different mechanism — Alderete more via through-balls; Ganiou more via ball-winning, creativity.
Marcos Alonso Celta Vigo · La Liga · 188 cm / 84 kg
61%
Driven by: carrying (21%), transition (18%), dribbling (14%). Different mechanism — Alderete more via passing directness; Alonso more via final-third threat, receiving zones.
11
Summary
Omar Alderete is a ball-playing centre-back: 76% pass completion, 13 line-breaking passes and 7.6 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]
Based on 3 matches (131 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a ball-playing centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is retention — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-playing centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.