العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportSerie A 2026

Oumar Solet

Udinese
Ball-playing centre-back CB
5.0 progressive passes/90 · 0.7 line-breaking/90
centre-backstopper centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
414
minutes
5 apps
295
passes
90% completed
90%
pass completion
295 passes
23
progressive passes
5.0/90
23
line-breaking passes
5.0/90
82
defensive actions
17.8/90
14
tackles + interceptions
100% tackle win
18
clearances
3.9/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Oumar Solet has played 5 matches (414 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (57% of his 295 passes)
90% completion · 295× in 5/5 matches
↓
CARRY OUT
step into midfield to commit a presser
13 carries · 26× in 5/5 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
5.0 prog/90 · 23× in 5/5 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 10× in 4/5 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
4.3/90 · 20× in 5/5 matches
Signature: receive in the first line → break the midfield line vertically → switch or progress. Press him early and shut the vertical lane to force the safe sideways ball.
16

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
59
passes / match
17.8
def actions / 90
24–95
pass range (matches)
18
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (24 at the low end, 95 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

07

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

84 tracked carries (18.3/90, 22 progressive, 795m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

1%4%8%6%1%7%21%21%2%2%8%11%4%2%
progressivelateral/short% of his 84 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 35m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
7Outside → Inside
67Inside → Inside
7Outside → Outside
3Inside → Outside
First (22)Second (21)Third (21)Fourth (20)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

6
tackle duels
6
won
0
beaten · 0%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 33%
OUTSIDE 67%
Tackle-duel location — 2 inside · 4 outside
Right Wing
3 · 50%
Right Half-Space
1 · 17%
Central
1 · 17%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
1 · 17%
Vision AI beaten in 0 of 6 tackle duels (0% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

For a centre-back the carry is a build-up weapon — does he step out through the middle, or keep it simple? Every carry classified by channel. Season rate: 2.83 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 62%
OUTSIDE 38%
Dribble location — 8 inside · 5 outside
Right Wing
1 · 8%
Right Half-Space
3 · 23%
Central
1 · 8%
Left Half-Space
4 · 31%
Left Wing
4 · 31%
Vision AI 62% of his carries are central — he steps out through the middle to draw a presser before releasing.
02

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

10%
vertical passes
19×
5%
switches
9×
38%
carries
71×
47%
short circulation
87×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW2438%946%1117%4RHS5634%199%546%269%52%1C9311%1023%2127%2534%325%5LHS717%535%2511%846%33LW2241%927%632%7FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right half-space in the middle third → central areas in the middle third — 2 progressive passes (14% of his progression) at 0.033 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 79% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 7% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

11% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.

Quality behind the volume: 3 line-breaking passes and 20 final-third entries, 3.0 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
4%7%6%4%3%4%16%17%11%1%0%3%4%11%8%3%
completedincomplete295 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
295
passes
90%
completed
29
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 90% season completion rate.
04

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

23
progressive · 5.0/90
20
final-third entries · 4.3/90
2
box entries · 0.43/90
20
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

How does he create chances?

4 key passes (0.87/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
25%25%50%
chance creation (4)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
09

Where does he become vulnerable?

35 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

3
attacking third (cheap)
18
middle third
14
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 9% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 3.58 danger-index/90 · 0.471 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
08

What is his passing profile?

295
passes attempted
46%
mostly forward
56%
mostly medium
Direction
Forward
135 · 46%
Sideways
101 · 34%
Backward
59 · 20%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
105 · 39%
Medium
148 · 56%
Long (>30m)
13 · 5%
10

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.250.250.230.170.150.10
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.25
Left Half-Space Def third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.25
Central Att third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.23
Left Half-Space Att third → Central Att third
1 passes · 1 to a shot
0.17
Central Mid third → Right Half-Space Mid third
2 passes
0.15
Left Half-Space Mid third → Central Mid third
1 passes
0.10
Right Wing Mid third → Right Half-Space Mid third
1 passes
05

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Oumar Solet gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
19%
Primary
Central, Middle third
17%
Secondary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
15%
Third
Central, Defensive third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
06

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Oumar Solet actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
8153323101146493452112020159
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

4%7%6%4%3%4%16%17%11%1%0%3%4%11%8%3%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

4Key pass
23Progressive
23Long ball
10Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
30Outside → Inside
152Inside → Inside
16Outside → Outside
68Inside → Outside
By direction
135Forward
59Backward
101Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the left hs, advancing it forward in the defensive third — 1 passes worth 0.25 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 4 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the left hs in the final third — 2 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the middle third: 21% of his 19 touches there are lost (4 times).
11%1/9 lost10%3/29 lost11%5/45 lost6%1/18 lost—6 touches · too few0%0/9 lost6%2/31 lost9%5/56 lost8%4/52 lost21%4/19 lost—7 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—7 touches · too few—2 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

82 defensive actions across the season (17.8/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
6
tackles · 100% won
8
interceptions · 1.7/90
23
recoveries · 5.0/90
18
clearances · 3.9/90
4
blocks
34
avg action height
4
won high (att 3rd)
37
middle third
41
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 37 proactive ball-wins (8.0/90), tackle success 100%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

14

Impact on the Team

Udinese's output per match with Oumar Solet (5 matches) versus without him (3 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 3 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (5)
WITHOUT (3)
Δ
goals against /match
2.00
2.67
-0.67
points /match
0.80
0.00
+0.80
goals for /match
1.20
1.00
+0.20
xG for /match
0.98
0.00
+0.98
15

His Share of the Team

Of everything Udinese produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Oumar Solet specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
17%
48 / 276
interceptions
16%
56 / 347
final-third entries
15%
218 / 1492
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

17

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 515 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Stopper centre-back86%Ball-playing centre-back72%
Why Stopper centre-back 86%: a weighted blend of ball-winning 88 (weight 40%) + defensive aggression 76 (weight 35%) + retention 61 (weight 15%) + transition 76 (weight 10%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
carrying, line-breaking, final-third threat, box threat, receiving zones, through-balls, dribbling, ball-winning, progression
Strong
creativity, crossing, defensive aggression, transition, press resistance
Average
retention, build-up, territory (wide vs central)
Weak
passing directness
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Carrying
98
Line-breaking
92
Final-third threat
92
Box threat
91
Receiving zones
89
Through-balls ~proxy
89
Dribbling
88
Ball-winning
88
Progression
88
Creativity
81
Crossing
79
Defensive aggression
76
Transition ~proxy
76
Press resistance ~proxy
73
Retention
61
Build-up
53
Territory (wide vs central)
51
Passing directness
30
18

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 192 cm / 88 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Nico Schlotterbeck Borussia Dortmund · Bundesliga · 191 cm / 81 kg
91%
Driven by: final-third threat (10%), progression (10%), box threat (9%). Different mechanism — Solet more via ball-winning; Schlotterbeck more via passing directness.
Giorgio Scalvini Atalanta · 194 cm / 76 kg
90%
Driven by: ball-winning (12%), box threat (10%), receiving zones (10%). Different mechanism — Solet more via carrying; Scalvini more via passing directness, territory (wide vs central).
Marcos Alonso Celta Vigo · La Liga · 188 cm / 84 kg
88%
Driven by: carrying (13%), progression (10%), final-third threat (10%). Different mechanism — Solet more via defensive aggression, ball-winning; Alonso more via passing directness, territory (wide vs central).
Strahinja Pavlovic AC Milan · 194 cm / 85 kg
85%
Driven by: carrying (19%), box threat (12%), receiving zones (9%). Different mechanism — Solet more via ball-winning, through-balls.
Dávid Hancko Atletico · La Liga · 188 cm / 82 kg
85%
Driven by: creativity (13%), final-third threat (12%), progression (11%). Different mechanism — Solet more via ball-winning, carrying; Hancko more via territory (wide vs central).
Marc Guéhi Man City · Premier League · 183 cm / 80 kg
85%
Driven by: carrying (12%), creativity (10%), final-third threat (10%). Different mechanism — Solet more via ball-winning, dribbling; Guéhi more via passing directness, retention.
19

Summary

Oumar Solet is a stopper centre-back / ball-playing centre-back: 90% pass completion, 23 line-breaking passes and 5.0 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 5 matches (414 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a stopper centre-back / ball-playing centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is retention — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall stopper centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report