العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026

Pascal Struijk

Brighton
Ball-playing centre-back CB
5.3 progressive passes/90 · 0.0 line-breaking/90
centre-backball-playing centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
203
minutes
4 apps
104
passes
91% completed
91%
pass completion
104 passes
12
progressive passes
5.3/90
3
line-breaking passes
1.3/90
31
defensive actions
13.7/90
2
tackles + interceptions
100% tackle win
8
clearances
3.5/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Pascal Struijk has played 4 matches (203 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the defensive third (55% of his 104 passes)
91% completion · 104× in 4/4 matches
Signature: Only Receive shows a proven, repeatable pattern this season — too little evidence yet (4 matches loaded) for a fuller signature chain.
Not a pattern: carry out — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); break a line — 3× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn); switch play — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); progress — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
11

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
26
passes / match
13.7
def actions / 90
2–49
pass range (matches)
8
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (2 at the low end, 49 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

05

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

22 tracked carries (9.8/90, 3 progressive, 167m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

5%5%23%5%5%5%27%18%9%
progressivelateral/short% of his 22 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 6m, longest 19m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
2Outside → Inside
14Inside → Inside
3Outside → Outside
3Inside → Outside
First (22)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

2
tackle duels
2
won
0
beaten · 0%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 100%
OUTSIDE 0%
Tackle-duel location — 2 inside · 0 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
1 · 50%
Left Half-Space
1 · 50%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 0 of 2 tackle duels (0% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 0 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

07

How does he create chances?

0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
03

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Pascal Struijk gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
18%
Primary
Left Half-Space, Defensive third
17%
Secondary
Left Wing, Defensive third
15%
Third
Central, Defensive third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
04

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Pascal Struijk actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
72812108121742213
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

2%1%3%8%12%16%4%7%27%12%10%
own goal left, attacking →
06

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

1Cross
12Progressive
3Long ball
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
9Outside → Inside
51Inside → Inside
14Outside → Outside
21Inside → Outside
By direction
46Forward
18Backward
40Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the central in the middle third — 1 passes worth 0.09 xT.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 28% of his 18 touches there are lost (5 times).
—1 touch · too few—3 touches · too few6%1/16 lost5%1/19 lost28%5/18 lost—1 touch · too few—5 touches · too few0%0/15 lost6%1/16 lost11%1/9 lost—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

08

How & where does he defend?

31 defensive actions across the season (13.7/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
2
tackles · 100% won
0
interceptions · 0.0/90
8
recoveries · 3.5/90
8
clearances · 3.5/90
2
blocks
32
avg action height
2
won high (att 3rd)
10
middle third
19
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 10 proactive ball-wins (4.4/90), tackle success 100%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

09

Impact on the Team

Brighton's output per match with Pascal Struijk (4 matches) versus without him (4 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 4 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (4)
WITHOUT (4)
Δ
goals against /match
0.25
1.50
-1.25
points /match
2.50
1.50
+1.00
goals for /match
2.75
3.00
-0.25
xG for /match
1.66
0.94
+0.71
10

His Share of the Team

Of everything Brighton produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Pascal Struijk specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
clearances
17%
218 / 1285
interceptions
8%
31 / 371
expected assists (xA)
8%
1.9 / 24.2
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

12

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 515 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Ball-playing centre-back69%Stopper centre-back59%
Why Ball-playing centre-back 69%: a weighted blend of build-up 73 (weight 30%) + retention 73 (weight 30%) + progression 44 (weight 25%) + press resistance 59 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
box threat, retention, build-up, defensive aggression
Average
creativity, press resistance, passing directness, line-breaking, territory (wide vs central), transition, receiving zones, final-third threat, progression, dribbling, ball-winning
Weak
carrying, through-balls, crossing
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Box threat
74
Retention
73
Build-up
73
Defensive aggression
70
Creativity
60
Press resistance ~proxy
59
Passing directness
55
Line-breaking
53
Territory (wide vs central)
53
Transition ~proxy
50
Receiving zones
49
Final-third threat
47
Progression
44
Dribbling
40
Ball-winning
40
Carrying
38
Through-balls ~proxy
37
Crossing
36
13

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 190 cm / 79 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

José María Giménez Deportivo · La Liga · 185 cm / 79 kg
69%
Driven by: defensive aggression (22%), build-up (20%), box threat (20%). Different mechanism — Struijk more via territory (wide vs central); Giménez more via passing directness, carrying.
Sepp van den Berg Brentford · 189 cm / 74 kg
68%
Driven by: retention (18%), box threat (16%), build-up (12%). Different mechanism — Struijk more via passing directness, receiving zones.
Robin Koch Eintracht Frankfurt · Bundesliga · 192 cm / 85 kg
61%
Driven by: retention (24%), build-up (24%), crossing (14%). Different mechanism — Struijk more via territory (wide vs central), line-breaking; Koch more via passing directness, through-balls.
Éder Militão Real Madrid · La Liga · 186 cm / 78 kg
60%
Driven by: defensive aggression (22%), box threat (20%), creativity (13%). Different mechanism — Struijk more via territory (wide vs central), through-balls; Militão more via receiving zones, creativity.
Evan Ndicka Roma · Serie A · 192 cm / 85 kg
60%
Driven by: build-up (21%), defensive aggression (17%), box threat (16%). Different mechanism — Struijk more via line-breaking, creativity.
Berat Djimsiti Atalanta · Serie A 25/26 · 190 cm / 83 kg
58%
Driven by: defensive aggression (32%), retention (19%), build-up (14%). Different mechanism — Struijk more via line-breaking; Djimsiti more via ball-winning, dribbling.
14

Summary

Pascal Struijk is a ball-playing centre-back / stopper centre-back: 91% pass completion, 3 line-breaking passes and 5.3 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 4 matches (203 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a ball-playing centre-back / stopper centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-playing centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report