Thin sample this season. Marcus Pedersen has played 1 match (69 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Right Wing, Middle third — mostly in the middle third (45% of his 20 passes)
100% of touches wide right · 20× in 1/1 matches
↓
CARRY / BEAT MAN
dribble past the full-back, cut inside
100% won · 1× in 1/1 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive the ball into the final third
1.3 progressive · 1.3 f3/90 · 1× in 1/1 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
1.30 key passes /90 · 0 goals · 1× in 1/1 matches
Signature: receive wide right → beat the full-back → carry into the left-foot channel → deliver or shoot. Stop the 1v1 on the right and you starve the chain.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Torino's output per match with Marcus Pedersen (1 matches) versus without him (7 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 7 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (1)
WITHOUT (7)
Δ
goals for /match
1.00
1.71
-0.71
xG for /match
0.98
0.00
+0.98
goals against /match
2.00
1.29
+0.71
points /match
0.00
1.86
-1.86
03
His Share of the Team
Of everything Torino produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Marcus Pedersen specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
progressive passes
10%
124 / 1204
box entries
10%
34 / 331
final-third entries
7%
77 / 1099
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 180 wingers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Territory (wide vs central)
96
Passing directness
69
Build-up
61
Progression
42
Final-third threat
42
Through-balls ~proxy
40
Transition ~proxy
36
Crossing
34
Ball-winning
31
Carrying
28
Retention
19
Press resistance ~proxy
19
Line-breaking
17
Defensive aggression
15
Dribbling
14
Box threat
11
Creativity
9
Receiving zones
3
05
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 184 cm / 76 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Franck Honorat Borussia Monchengladbach · Bundesliga · 180 cm / 70 kg
83%
Driven by: defensive aggression (22%), box threat (14%), press resistance (13%). Different mechanism — Pedersen more via territory (wide vs central); Honorat more via creativity, line-breaking.
Denzel Dumfries Real Madrid · La Liga · 188 cm / 80 kg
77%
Driven by: creativity (13%), dribbling (12%), press resistance (11%). Different mechanism — Pedersen more via passing directness, final-third threat; Dumfries more via retention, defensive aggression.
Anthony Elanga Newcastle · Premier League · 178 cm / 75 kg
76%
Driven by: press resistance (16%), box threat (16%), territory (wide vs central) (13%). Different mechanism — Pedersen more via build-up; Elanga more via creativity, receiving zones.
Panos Katseris Lorient · Ligue 1 · 187 cm
72%
Driven by: receiving zones (13%), press resistance (12%), territory (wide vs central) (11%). Different mechanism — Katseris more via ball-winning, creativity.
Joel Mvuka Lorient · Ligue 1 25/26 · 176 cm / 66 kg
72%
Driven by: creativity (15%), receiving zones (14%), box threat (11%). Different mechanism — Pedersen more via passing directness, through-balls; Mvuka more via ball-winning, defensive aggression.
Jacob Ondrejka Parma Calcio 1913 25/26 · 180 cm / 73 kg
64%
Driven by: defensive aggression (27%), creativity (18%), receiving zones (12%). Different mechanism — Pedersen more via territory (wide vs central), build-up; Ondrejka more via box threat, crossing.
06
Summary
Marcus Pedersen is a wide, outside-first right carrier: 100% of dribbles in the wing lane, 75% of passes from wide — but 64% land inside. 1.3 progressive passes and 1.30 key passes /90 plus 0 goals from 0.00 xG. A carry-and-deliver threat.
Based on 1 matches (69 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a wide dribbler / isolator — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is box threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall wide dribbler / isolator profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
← BACK TO SEARCH
