His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the defensive third (51% of his 131 passes)
79% completion · 131× in 4/4 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
3.8 prog/90 · 28× in 4/4 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 4× in 2/4 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
1.3/90 · 4× in 3/4 matches
Signature: Receive → Break A Line → Switch Play → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: carry out — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
12
Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?
Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.
own goal left, attacking →
33
passes / match
15.5
def actions / 90
9–57
pass range (matches)
19
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (9 at the low end, 57 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
21 tracked carries (6.6/90, 4 progressive, 163m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.
progressivelateral/short% of his 21 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 6m, longest 21m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
First (21)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →
Beaten in the tackle
How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).
8
tackle duels
5
won
3
beaten · 38%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 75%
OUTSIDE 25%
Tackle-duel location — 6 inside · 2 outside
Right Wing
2 · 25%
Right Half-Space
2 · 25%
Central
1 · 12%
Left Half-Space
3 · 38%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 3 of 8 tackle duels (38% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →
He attempted only 0 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.
08
How does he create chances?
0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
03
Where does he become vulnerable?
27 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.
1
attacking third (cheap)
13
middle third
13
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 4% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 4.99 danger-index/90 · 0.585 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
04
Where Does He Receive?
The zones where Vanja Drkusic gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
24%
Primary
Right Half-Space, Middle third
24%
Secondary
Right Half-Space, Defensive third
17%
Third
Right Wing, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
05
Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone
Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Vanja Drkusic actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.
Filter:
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches
Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone
Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.
own goal left, attacking →
07
Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete
Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the right hs, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 passes worth 0.21 xT.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 37% of his 19 touches there are lost (7 times).
49 defensive actions across the season (15.5/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
8
tackles · 62% won
2
interceptions · 0.6/90
6
recoveries · 1.9/90
19
clearances · 6.0/90
3
blocks
21
avg action height
1
won high (att 3rd)
7
middle third
41
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by clearing and blocking — a reactive, protect-the-box profile. 16 proactive ball-wins (5.1/90), tackle success 62%. He defends deep, protecting his box — a last-line stopper.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Espanyol's output per match with Vanja Drkusic (5 matches) versus without him (5 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 5 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (5)
WITHOUT (5)
Δ
goals against /match
1.40
1.40
+0.00
points /match
0.60
1.00
-0.40
goals for /match
1.00
1.40
-0.40
xG for /match
0.78
1.40
-0.62
11
His Share of the Team
Of everything Espanyol produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Vanja Drkusic specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
clearances
2%
19 / 1169
tackles
1%
8 / 720
expected assists (xA)
1%
0.3 / 38.4
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 585 centre-backs in the pool (min 180 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Stopper centre-back29%Ball-playing centre-back17%
Why Stopper centre-back 29%: a weighted blend of ball-winning 46 (weight 40%) + defensive aggression 40 (weight 35%) + retention 11 (weight 15%) + transition 12 (weight 10%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
—
Average
territory (wide vs central), crossing, build-up, ball-winning, creativity, defensive aggression
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Territory (wide vs central)
63
Crossing
53
Build-up
51
Ball-winning
46
Creativity
42
Defensive aggression
40
Through-balls ~proxy
20
Carrying
13
Transition ~proxy
12
Retention
11
Passing directness
11
Final-third threat
11
Dribbling
10
Press resistance ~proxy
10
Progression
8
Receiving zones
7
Box threat
4
Line-breaking
3
14
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 188 cm / 80 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Saba Sazonov Getafe · 192 cm / 82 kg
92%
Driven by: press resistance (15%), transition (14%), progression (9%). Different mechanism — Drkusic more via creativity; Sazonov more via line-breaking, box threat.
Oier Luengo Real Oviedo 25/26 · 183 cm / 82 kg
90%
Driven by: transition (14%), progression (11%), press resistance (10%). Different mechanism — Drkusic more via defensive aggression, creativity; Luengo more via retention, box threat.
Dominik Drobnic Parma Calcio 1913 · Serie A · 194 cm
88%
Driven by: press resistance (15%), transition (10%), progression (10%). Different mechanism — Drkusic more via ball-winning, creativity; Drobnic more via passing directness, final-third threat.
Ethan Pinnock Coventry · Premier League · 194 cm / 79 kg
86%
Driven by: transition (16%), progression (13%), carrying (12%). Different mechanism — Drkusic more via build-up; Pinnock more via passing directness, box threat.
Zeno Van den Bosch Union Berlin · Bundesliga · 191 cm / 78 kg
84%
Driven by: transition (15%), receiving zones (12%), progression (11%). Different mechanism — Drkusic more via crossing, creativity; Bosch more via dribbling, passing directness.
Daiki Hashioka Borussia Monchengladbach · Bundesliga · 184 cm / 73 kg
83%
Driven by: press resistance (17%), transition (15%), carrying (10%). Different mechanism — Drkusic more via build-up; Hashioka more via through-balls, box threat.
15
Summary
Vanja Drkusic is a stopper centre-back: 79% pass completion, 28 line-breaking passes and 3.8 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]
Based on 5 matches (285 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a stopper centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is retention — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall stopper centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.