His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Central, Defensive third — between the lines — mostly in the defensive third (67% of his 3 passes)
67% completion · 3× in 1/1 matches
↓
TURN / BEAT MAN
face forward in the pocket
0% won · 1× in 1/1 matches
↓
CREATE
through-ball, cut-back, key pass
3.91/90 · 1× in 1/1 matches
Signature: Receive → Turn / Beat Man → Create — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: finish — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Genoa's output per match with Hamed Traoré (1 matches) versus without him (37 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 37 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (1)
WITHOUT (37)
Δ
goals for /match
2.00
1.51
+0.49
xG for /match
1.10
0.00
+1.10
goals against /match
4.00
1.35
+2.65
points /match
0.00
1.54
-1.54
03
His Share of the Team
Of everything Genoa produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Hamed Traoré specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
5%
13 / 260
box entries
3%
17 / 498
zone-14 entries
3%
8 / 259
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 247 attacking mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Advanced playmaker (8)45%Half-space creator41%
Why Advanced playmaker (8) 45%: a weighted blend of progression 68 (weight 25%) + final-third threat 54 (weight 25%) + creativity 33 (weight 35%) + box threat 38 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
press resistance, progression, dribbling, passing directness, through-balls, carrying, territory (wide vs central), final-third threat, defensive aggression, receiving zones
Weak
box threat, crossing, creativity
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Ball-winning
81
Build-up
79
Line-breaking
72
Transition ~proxy
71
Retention
70
Press resistance ~proxy
70
Progression
68
Dribbling
67
Passing directness
67
Through-balls ~proxy
61
Carrying
60
Territory (wide vs central)
56
Final-third threat
54
Defensive aggression
54
Receiving zones
47
Box threat
38
Crossing
37
Creativity
33
05
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 184 cm / 77 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
André Almeida Racing Santander · La Liga · 176 cm / 62 kg
65%
Driven by: ball-winning (19%), build-up (18%), transition (14%). Different mechanism — Traoré more via territory (wide vs central), box threat; Almeida more via creativity, crossing.
Iliman Ndiaye Man City · Premier League · 180 cm / 78 kg
62%
Driven by: ball-winning (27%), press resistance (15%), transition (10%). Different mechanism — Traoré more via passing directness, through-balls; Ndiaye more via carrying, creativity.
Carney Chukwuemeka Borussia Dortmund · Bundesliga · 187 cm / 77 kg
59%
Driven by: ball-winning (21%), press resistance (12%), crossing (11%). Different mechanism — Traoré more via territory (wide vs central), through-balls; Chukwuemeka more via receiving zones, creativity.
Nico Paz Como · 185 cm / 79 kg
58%
Driven by: ball-winning (21%), build-up (14%), press resistance (11%). Different mechanism — Traoré more via territory (wide vs central); Paz more via box threat, creativity.
Arthur Atta Fiorentina · 189 cm / 77 kg
58%
Driven by: build-up (18%), press resistance (17%), transition (12%). Different mechanism — Traoré more via ball-winning, defensive aggression; Atta more via carrying, dribbling.
Ibrahim Maza Leverkusen · Bundesliga · 180 cm / 79 kg
53%
Driven by: ball-winning (18%), transition (17%), press resistance (10%). Different mechanism — Traoré more via territory (wide vs central); Maza more via box threat, receiving zones.
06
Summary
Hamed Traoré is an advanced playmaker (8): 3.91 key passes /90, 0.0 progressive passes, 0 goals from 0.00 xG. A between-the-lines creator. [Off-ball movement into pockets needs tracking.]
Based on 1 matches (23 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as an advanced playmaker (8) — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is creativity — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall advanced playmaker (8) profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
