Thin sample this season. Wilson Isidor has played 6 matches (246 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
Signature: Link → Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: receive / move — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); convert — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
37 defensive actions across the season (13.5/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
2
tackles · 50% won
0
interceptions · 0.0/90
6
recoveries · 2.2/90
0
clearances · 0.0/90
0
blocks
64
avg action height
15
won high (att 3rd)
20
middle third
2
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 8 proactive ball-wins (2.9/90), tackle success 50%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
Defensive work in the attacking half
Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.
32
attacking-half actions · 11.71/90
02
Against Different Pressing Intensities
Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Wilson Isidor keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-2 matches — directional evidence, not proof.
press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 3.6, 2m)
0.08
0.0
0.00
50%
Mid press (PPDA 4.5, 2m)
0.08
0.0
0.00
0%
Low press (PPDA 5.6, 2m)
0.10
0.7
0.00
0%
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Sunderland's output per match with Wilson Isidor (6 matches) versus without him (2 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 2 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (6)
WITHOUT (2)
Δ
goals for /match
1.00
0.00
+1.00
xG for /match
1.69
0.00
+1.69
goals against /match
2.00
1.00
+1.00
points /match
0.67
0.50
+0.17
05
His Share of the Team
Of everything Sunderland produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Wilson Isidor specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
goals
17%
1 / 6
expected goals (xG)
13%
6.6 / 52.1
shots
10%
50 / 510
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 299 strikers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Why Transition runner 58%: a weighted blend of transition 54 (weight 45%) + defensive aggression 57 (weight 30%) + box threat 60 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Passing directness
90
Box threat
60
Defensive aggression
57
Transition ~proxy
54
Ball-winning
36
Carrying
34
Territory (wide vs central)
31
Progression
31
Line-breaking
29
Final-third threat
24
Crossing
21
Press resistance ~proxy
19
Dribbling
18
Receiving zones
17
Build-up
15
Creativity
11
Retention
10
Through-balls ~proxy
10
07
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 184 cm / 72 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Ante Budimir Osasuna · La Liga · 190 cm / 75 kg
91%
Driven by: press resistance (12%), retention (12%), creativity (10%). Different mechanism — Isidor more via carrying, territory (wide vs central); Budimir more via build-up.
Rodrigo Muniz Fulham · 185 cm / 79 kg
87%
Driven by: creativity (14%), build-up (12%), retention (10%). Different mechanism — Isidor more via carrying, box threat; Muniz more via through-balls.
Antonio Raimondo Frosinone · Serie A · 185 cm / 73 kg
84%
Driven by: build-up (17%), press resistance (13%), retention (11%). Different mechanism — Isidor more via line-breaking; Raimondo more via territory (wide vs central), through-balls.
Luis Vázquez Getafe · La Liga 25/26 · 190 cm / 82 kg
82%
Driven by: retention (13%), build-up (13%), press resistance (13%). Different mechanism — Isidor more via box threat, progression; Vázquez more via receiving zones, creativity.
Adam Buksa Udinese · Serie A 25/26 · 191 cm / 78 kg
80%
Driven by: retention (14%), press resistance (14%), build-up (12%). Different mechanism — Isidor more via box threat, carrying; Buksa more via ball-winning, final-third threat.
Caleb Ekuban Genoa · Serie A 25/26 · 188 cm / 80 kg
79%
Driven by: retention (16%), receiving zones (14%), build-up (13%). Different mechanism — Isidor more via passing directness; Ekuban more via through-balls, ball-winning.
08
Summary
Wilson Isidor is a transition runner: 1 goals from 1.06 xG (-0.06 vs expected), 7 shots, 0 box entries. Under-performing his chances. [Off-ball runs, aerials and hold-up under contact need tracking/aerial data.]
Based on 6 matches (246 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a transition runner — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall transition runner profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
← BACK TO SEARCH
