العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLa Liga 2026
MAL

Joaquín Muñoz

Malaga
Balanced wide forward W
wing 58% · inside 42% — no dominant lane
Capability Analysis
Wide Delivery2%vs 20 wingers
"Does he create danger from wide areas -- crosses and cutbacks?"
Crosses /900.00%
Cross accuracy: 0.0%
Cutbacks /901.125%
Chance Creation18%vs 20 wingers
"Does he create real chances for others?"
Expected assists /900.1xA55%
Through balls /900.00%
Threat added by passing /900.38xT5%
Box entries (pass) /901.310%
Ball-Carrying39%vs 20 wingers
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /902.610%
Carry distance /9075.33m15%
Successful take-ons /901.6755%
Take-on success40.91%75%
Box Threat12%vs 20 wingers
"Is he a genuine goal threat by shot volume and quality?"
xG /900.07xG0%
Shots /901.310%
xGOT /900.13xGOT25%
left winger1v1 carriercuts insidehalf-space creator
484
minutes
9 apps
0
goals
0.38 xG
22
dribbles
41% won
7
key passes
1.30/90
2
box entries
0.37/90
0
progressive passes
0.0/90
5
final-3rd entries
0.9/90
74%
pass completion
139 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Left Wing, Attacking third — mostly in the attacking third (61% of his 139 passes)
55% of touches wide left · 139× in 9/9 matches
↓
CARRY / BEAT MAN
dribble past the full-back, cut inside
41% won · 22× in 8/9 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
1.30 key passes /90 · 0 goals · 14× in 5/9 matches
Signature: Receive → Carry / Beat Man → Create / Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: progress — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
15

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
15
passes / match
2.8
dribbles / match
9–24
pass range (matches)
2–4
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (9 at the low end, 24 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

04

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

41 tracked carries (7.6/90, 5 progressive, 405m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

7%2%2%7%10%56%15%
progressivelateral/short% of his 41 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 40m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
14Outside → Inside
6Inside → Inside
21Outside → Outside
First (29)Second (8)Third (4)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Joaquín Muñoz's signature is the dribble. Does he carry outside (down the left wing) or inside (into the half-space / centre)? Every dribble classified by channel. Season rate: 4.09 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 45%
OUTSIDE 55%
Dribble location — 10 inside · 12 outside
Right Wing
1 · 5%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
2 · 9%
Left Half-Space
8 · 36%
Left Wing
11 · 50%
Vision AI 55% of his dribbles are in the wide left lane — he attacks the full-back on the outside, then threatens to cut inside onto his right foot.
05

How does he create chances?

7 key passes (1.30/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
40%20%40%
chance creation (5)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (3)from the right (2)of 5 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
09

Where does he become vulnerable?

49 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

35
attacking third (cheap)
6
middle third
8
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 71% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.86 danger-index/90 · 0.204 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
02

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Joaquín Muñoz gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
31%
Primary
Left Wing, Attacking third
16%
Secondary
Left Wing, Middle third
16%
Third
Left Half-Space, Attacking third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
03

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Joaquín Muñoz actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
212830502422410321810
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%1%5%6%1%1%2%6%1%9%5%18%29%13%
own goal left, attacking →
10

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

7Key pass
1Cross
4Cutback
11Long ball
4Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
32Outside → Inside
25Inside → Inside
35Outside → Outside
11Inside → Outside
By direction
28Forward
61Backward
50Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
08

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 7 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right wing toward the central in the final third — 2 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 50% of his 8 touches there are lost (4 times).
—2 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—6 touches · too few50%4/8 lost—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few—4 touches · too few11%1/9 lost9%2/22 lost33%4/12 lost—4 touches · too few50%4/8 lost32%6/19 lost21%9/42 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
06

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 41 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he drives along the touchline (51%). He carries from outside into the middle 14 times and out toward the touchline 0 — a genuine inside forward who cuts in with the ball.
07

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
3 · 7%
Progressive / key pass
7 · 17%
Simple pass
16 · 39%
No clean link
15 · 37%
Of 41 carries, 7% flow straight into a shot of his own, 17% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 37% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

12

How & where does he defend?

56 defensive actions across the season (10.4/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
5
tackles · 60% won
2
interceptions · 0.4/90
16
recoveries · 3.0/90
1
clearances · 0.2/90
2
blocks
47
avg action height
13
won high (att 3rd)
23
middle third
20
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 23 proactive ball-wins (4.3/90), tackle success 60%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

28
attacking-half actions · 5.21/90
11

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Joaquín Muñoz keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~3-3 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 3.9, 3m)
0.38
0.0
0.54
50%
Mid press (PPDA 6.4, 3m)
0.35
0.0
3.60
33%
Low press (PPDA 7.3, 3m)
0.40
0.0
0.47
40%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

13

Impact on the Team

Malaga's output per match with Joaquín Muñoz (9 matches) versus without him (1 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 1 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (9)
WITHOUT (1)
Δ
goals for /match
0.67
1.00
-0.33
xG for /match
0.89
0.00
+0.89
goals against /match
2.00
1.00
+1.00
points /match
0.44
1.00
-0.56
14

His Share of the Team

Of everything Malaga produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Joaquín Muñoz specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
7%
9 / 123
box entries
5%
7 / 138
expected assists (xA)
5%
0.5 / 11.1
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

16

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 180 wingers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Pressing forward46%Wide dribbler / isolator29%Half-space creator28%Transition runner25%
Why Pressing forward 46%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 68 (weight 45%) + ball-winning 40 (weight 30%) + transition 21 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
—
Average
defensive aggression, dribbling, press resistance, retention, territory (wide vs central), creativity, ball-winning
Weak
receiving zones, build-up, crossing, carrying, transition, progression, line-breaking, box threat, final-third threat, passing directness, through-balls
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Defensive aggression
68
Dribbling
59
Press resistance ~proxy
57
Retention
49
Territory (wide vs central)
45
Creativity
45
Ball-winning
40
Receiving zones
35
Build-up
30
Crossing
23
Carrying
23
Transition ~proxy
21
Progression
20
Line-breaking
16
Box threat
15
Final-third threat
15
Passing directness
9
Through-balls ~proxy
2
17

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 173 cm / 60 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Jan Virgili Mallorca 25/26 · 168 cm
90%
Driven by: through-balls (15%), final-third threat (11%), progression (10%). Different mechanism — Virgili more via carrying.
Romaine Mundle Sunderland · Premier League · 172 cm / 61 kg
81%
Driven by: through-balls (14%), passing directness (12%), crossing (12%). Different mechanism — Muñoz more via defensive aggression; Mundle more via build-up, retention.
Jorge de Frutos Rayo Vallecano · 173 cm / 72 kg
76%
Driven by: transition (15%), final-third threat (14%), through-balls (12%). Different mechanism — Muñoz more via creativity, receiving zones; Frutos more via box threat, passing directness.
Pontus Almqvist Parma Calcio 1913 · Serie A · 183 cm / 67 kg
76%
Driven by: transition (13%), progression (12%), through-balls (11%). Different mechanism — Muñoz more via dribbling, press resistance; Almqvist more via ball-winning.
Alieu Njie Fiorentina · Serie A · 171 cm / 60 kg
76%
Driven by: through-balls (14%), crossing (12%), passing directness (11%). Different mechanism — Muñoz more via territory (wide vs central); Njie more via box threat, carrying.
Omar Marmoush Tottenham · Premier League · 180 cm / 80 kg
72%
Driven by: transition (17%), final-third threat (13%), progression (12%). Different mechanism — Muñoz more via territory (wide vs central), creativity; Marmoush more via box threat, retention.
18

Summary

Joaquín Muñoz is a wide, outside-first left carrier: 55% of dribbles in the wing lane, 63% of passes from wide — but 55% land inside. 0.0 progressive passes and 1.30 key passes /90 plus 0 goals from 0.38 xG. A carry-and-deliver threat.

Based on 9 matches (484 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a pressing forward — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall pressing forward profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report