العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportSerie A 2026

Fali Candé

Sassuolo
Ball-playing centre-back CB
5.7 progressive passes/90 · 1.0 line-breaking/90
centre-backstopper centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
94
minutes
1 apps
68
passes
93% completed
93%
pass completion
68 passes
6
progressive passes
5.7/90
4
line-breaking passes
3.8/90
14
defensive actions
13.4/90
1
tackles + interceptions
0% tackle win
7
clearances
6.7/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Fali Candé has played 1 match (94 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the defensive third (50% of his 68 passes)
93% completion · 68× in 1/1 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
5.7 prog/90 · 4× in 1/1 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 2× in 1/1 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
2.9/90 · 3× in 1/1 matches
Signature: Receive → Break A Line → Switch Play → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: carry out — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

03

How does he create chances?

0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the left wing in the middle third — 2 passes worth 0.12 xT.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 18% of his 11 touches there are lost (2 times).
—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—7 touches · too few0%0/16 lost18%2/11 lost—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—4 touches · too few0%0/13 lost0%0/12 lost—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—2 touches · too few—2 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

04

Impact on the Team

Sassuolo's output per match with Fali Candé (1 matches) versus without him (7 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 7 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (1)
WITHOUT (7)
Δ
goals against /match
2.00
2.00
+0.00
points /match
0.00
1.14
-1.14
goals for /match
0.00
1.71
-1.71
xG for /match
0.39
0.35
+0.04
05

His Share of the Team

Of everything Sassuolo produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Fali Candé specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
clearances
5%
38 / 821
ball recoveries
2%
29 / 1502
zone-14 entries
2%
4 / 238
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

06

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 513 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Stopper centre-back40%Ball-playing centre-back14%
Why Stopper centre-back 40%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 60 (weight 35%) + ball-winning 40 (weight 40%) + transition 40 (weight 10%) + retention 12 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
territory (wide vs central)
Average
defensive aggression, creativity, receiving zones, passing directness, line-breaking, ball-winning
Weak
transition, box threat, progression, build-up, final-third threat, retention, through-balls, press resistance, crossing, dribbling, carrying
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Territory (wide vs central)
84
Defensive aggression
60
Creativity
56
Receiving zones
50
Passing directness
42
Line-breaking
41
Ball-winning
40
Transition ~proxy
40
Box threat
31
Progression
29
Build-up
26
Final-third threat
14
Retention
12
Through-balls ~proxy
10
Press resistance ~proxy
9
Crossing
9
Dribbling
9
Carrying
7
07

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 184 cm / 82 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Abdel Abqar Getafe · La Liga · 188 cm / 80 kg
81%
Driven by: press resistance (18%), carrying (15%), retention (14%). Different mechanism — Candé more via receiving zones, territory (wide vs central); Abqar more via through-balls, passing directness.
Alan Matturro Levante · La Liga 25/26 · 189 cm / 74 kg
75%
Driven by: press resistance (20%), dribbling (14%), crossing (13%). Different mechanism — Candé more via territory (wide vs central), line-breaking; Matturro more via box threat, carrying.
Ethan Pinnock Coventry · Premier League · 194 cm / 79 kg
74%
Driven by: carrying (18%), press resistance (12%), final-third threat (11%). Different mechanism — Candé more via receiving zones, creativity; Pinnock more via crossing, dribbling.
Francesco Folino Cremonese 25/26 · 192 cm
73%
Driven by: press resistance (18%), dribbling (14%), carrying (14%). Different mechanism — Candé more via defensive aggression, ball-winning; Folino more via line-breaking, progression.
Tobias Slotsager Hellas Verona 25/26 · 190 cm
71%
Driven by: press resistance (27%), dribbling (15%), retention (15%). Different mechanism — Candé more via creativity, line-breaking; Slotsager more via crossing, final-third threat.
Bobby Thomas Coventry · Premier League · 193 cm / 77 kg
71%
Driven by: crossing (17%), carrying (15%), through-balls (13%). Different mechanism — Candé more via territory (wide vs central); Thomas more via box threat, dribbling.
08

Summary

Fali Candé is a stopper centre-back: 93% pass completion, 4 line-breaking passes and 5.7 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 1 matches (94 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a stopper centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is retention — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall stopper centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report