العربيةSeason20262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportSerie A 2026

Sandro Kulenovic

Torino
Complete forward ST
2.5 shots/90 with 0.00 key passes/90
strikerpressing forwardbox threatfinishing
181
minutes
7 apps
2
goals
0.49 xG
0.5
xG
5 shots
5
shots
0.10 xG/shot
0
box entries
0.00/90
0
key passes
0.00/90
3
dribbles
33% won
66%
pass completion
35 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Sandro Kulenovic has played 7 matches (181 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

LINK
lay-off and combine
0 key passes · 66% completion · 35× in 6/6 matches
↓
FINISH
shoot from central zones
0.49 xG · 5× in 2/6 matches
Signature: Link → Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: receive / move — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); convert — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

02

How does he create chances?

0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

04

How & where does he defend?

31 defensive actions across the season (15.4/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
2
tackles · 0% won
0
interceptions · 0.0/90
3
recoveries · 1.5/90
2
clearances · 1.0/90
1
blocks
57
avg action height
14
won high (att 3rd)
13
middle third
4
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 5 proactive ball-wins (2.5/90), tackle success 0%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

21
attacking-half actions · 10.44/90
03

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Sandro Kulenovic keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-3 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 3.9, 2m)
0.23
0.0
0.00
0%
Mid press (PPDA 4.7, 2m)
0.27
0.0
0.00
0%
Low press (PPDA 6.1, 3m)
0.19
0.0
0.00
100%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

05

Impact on the Team

Torino's output per match with Sandro Kulenovic (7 matches) versus without him (2 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 2 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (7)
WITHOUT (2)
Δ
goals for /match
1.71
1.00
+0.71
xG for /match
1.08
0.85
+0.23
goals against /match
1.57
1.50
+0.07
points /match
1.43
1.50
-0.07
06

His Share of the Team

Of everything Torino produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Sandro Kulenovic specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
goals
14%
2 / 14
zone-14 entries
3%
7 / 276
expected goals (xG)
2%
1.0 / 58.5
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

07

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 299 strikers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Pressing forward67%Transition runner50%False 937%Poacher20%
Why Pressing forward 67%: a weighted blend of ball-winning 78 (weight 30%) + defensive aggression 51 (weight 45%) + transition 68 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
territory (wide vs central), ball-winning
Average
transition, progression, passing directness, crossing, receiving zones, creativity, defensive aggression, carrying, line-breaking, dribbling
Weak
final-third threat, build-up, press resistance, retention, box threat, through-balls
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Territory (wide vs central)
79
Ball-winning
78
Transition ~proxy
68
Progression
62
Passing directness
62
Crossing
61
Receiving zones
57
Creativity
55
Defensive aggression
51
Carrying
50
Line-breaking
46
Dribbling
41
Final-third threat
39
Build-up
38
Press resistance ~proxy
37
Retention
25
Box threat
16
Through-balls ~proxy
10
08

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 191 cm / 76 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Adrián Liso Getafe · La Liga 25/26 · 182 cm / 70 kg
65%
Driven by: box threat (27%), retention (15%), territory (wide vs central) (13%). Different mechanism — Kulenovic more via creativity, receiving zones; Liso more via through-balls, defensive aggression.
Armando Broja Burnley · Premier League 25/26 · 191 cm / 83 kg
63%
Driven by: box threat (27%), through-balls (22%), territory (wide vs central) (14%). Different mechanism — Kulenovic more via passing directness, creativity; Broja more via carrying.
Felix Mambimbi Le Havre · Ligue 1 25/26 · 171 cm / 68 kg
58%
Driven by: box threat (30%), ball-winning (20%), transition (16%). Different mechanism — Kulenovic more via crossing; Mambimbi more via through-balls, passing directness.
Youssef El-Arabi Nantes · Ligue 1 25/26 · 183 cm / 70 kg
57%
Driven by: retention (21%), ball-winning (16%), box threat (16%). Different mechanism — Kulenovic more via territory (wide vs central), crossing; El-Arabi more via line-breaking, passing directness.
Mariano Díaz Alaves · La Liga · 180 cm / 76 kg
56%
Driven by: box threat (25%), transition (15%), build-up (14%). Different mechanism — Kulenovic more via ball-winning; Díaz more via through-balls, passing directness.
Christantus Uche Crystal Palace · La Liga 25/26 · 190 cm / 84 kg
54%
Driven by: through-balls (19%), retention (17%), box threat (16%). Different mechanism — Kulenovic more via crossing, ball-winning; Uche more via passing directness.
09

Summary

Sandro Kulenovic is a pressing forward: 2 goals from 0.49 xG (+1.51 vs expected), 5 shots, 0 box entries. A clinical finisher. [Off-ball runs, aerials and hold-up under contact need tracking/aerial data.]

Based on 7 matches (181 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a pressing forward — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is defensive aggression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall pressing forward profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report