العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportSerie A 2026

Daniel Bragança

Torino
Half-space creator CM
42% of actions in the half-spaces
central midtempo controllerprogressionbox-to-box
313
minutes
6 apps
9
progressive passes
2.6/90
90%
pass completion
161 passes
1
key passes
0.29/90
3
box entries
0.86/90
9
final-3rd entries
2.6/90
5
dribbles
60% won
18
possessions lost
1.67 danger/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Central, Middle third — mostly in the middle third (56% of his 161 passes)
90% completion · 161× in 6/6 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive or pass into the final third
2.6 prog/90 · 9× in 3/6 matches
↓
ARRIVE
get into the box late
1 key passes · 3× in 3/6 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
0.29 key passes /90 · 1 goals · 6× in 1/6 matches
Signature: receive → progress → arrive in the box → create or finish. A box-to-box midfielder judged across every phase.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
27
passes / match
1.7
dribbles / match
8–48
pass range (matches)
1–3
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (8 at the low end, 48 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

07

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

45 tracked carries (12.9/90, 9 progressive, 404m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

7%7%2%13%29%13%9%2%7%9%2%
progressivelateral/short% of his 45 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 25m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
1Outside → Inside
38Inside → Inside
4Outside → Outside
2Inside → Outside
First (23)Second (14)Third (8)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Only 5 dribbles attempted this season — too little volume to map a location pattern.

08

How does he build & move the ball?

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW1155%627%318%2RHS3037%1130%920%613%4C587%421%1229%1728%1616%9LHS353%140%1426%931%11LW119%118%273%8FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the left half-space in the middle third → the left half-space in the middle third — 2 progressive passes (22% of his progression) at 0.015 xT each. He keeps it in the same lane.

His progression is inward: 44% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 11% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 6% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 2 line-breaking passes and 9 final-third entries, -0.8 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
3%4%6%10%1%1%13%11%16%6%1%1%4%11%7%4%2%
completedincomplete161 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
161
passes
90%
completed
16
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 90% season completion rate.
02

How does he create chances?

1 key passes (0.29/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
100%
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
10

Where does he become vulnerable?

18 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

6
attacking third (cheap)
8
middle third
4
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 33% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.67 danger-index/90 · 0.322 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
11

What is his passing profile?

161
passes attempted
35%
mostly sideways
57%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
54 · 34%
Sideways
56 · 35%
Backward
51 · 32%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
83 · 57%
Medium
55 · 38%
Long (>30m)
7 · 5%
05

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Daniel Bragança gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
22%
Primary
Central, Middle third
15%
Secondary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
12%
Third
Right Half-Space, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
06

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Daniel Bragança actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
1717117412118271335810162
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

3%4%6%10%1%1%13%11%16%6%1%1%4%11%7%4%2%
own goal left, attacking →
12

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

1Key pass
1Cross
1Cutback
9Progressive
13Long ball
5Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
8Outside → Inside
88Inside → Inside
14Outside → Outside
35Inside → Outside
By direction
54Forward
51Backward
56Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the central in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the final third: 17% of his 12 touches there are lost (2 times).
—2 touches · too few—3 touches · too few6%1/18 lost—6 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—5 touches · too few6%1/18 lost11%4/36 lost0%0/25 lost—6 touches · too few—6 touches · too few17%2/12 lost10%1/10 lost—6 touches · too few—5 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
04

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 45 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he carries through central areas (84%). He carries from outside into the middle 1 times and out toward the touchline 2 — a width-holder who drives down the line.
09

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
1 · 2%
Progressive / key pass
3 · 7%
Simple pass
37 · 82%
No clean link
4 · 9%
Of 45 carries, 2% flow straight into a shot of his own, 7% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 9% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

14

How & where does he defend?

49 defensive actions across the season (14.1/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
6
tackles · 33% won
4
interceptions · 1.2/90
11
recoveries · 3.2/90
6
clearances · 1.7/90
2
blocks
42
avg action height
11
won high (att 3rd)
19
middle third
19
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 21 proactive ball-wins (6.0/90), tackle success 33%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
13

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Daniel Bragança keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-2 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 4.7, 2m)
0.69
3.1
0.00
100%
Mid press (PPDA 5.4, 2m)
0.97
3.1
0.77
50%
Low press (PPDA 7.1, 2m)
0.37
1.2
0.00
0%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Torino's output per match with Daniel Bragança (6 matches) versus without him (2 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 2 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (6)
WITHOUT (2)
Δ
goals for /match
1.83
1.00
+0.83
xG for /match
1.05
0.00
+1.05
goals against /match
1.17
2.00
-0.83
points /match
2.17
0.00
+2.17
16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Torino produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Daniel Bragança specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
goals
9%
1 / 11
expected goals (xG)
1%
0.7 / 53.6
interceptions
1%
4 / 305
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 433 central mids in the pool (min 180 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Tempo controller84%Deep-lying playmaker77%Transition runner72%Box-to-box runner59%
Why Tempo controller 84%: a weighted blend of retention 93 (weight 35%) + build-up 79 (weight 30%) + press resistance 85 (weight 20%) + progression 38 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
retention, dribbling, defensive aggression, press resistance
Strong
carrying, build-up, box threat
Average
ball-winning, transition
Weak
progression, crossing, final-third threat, through-balls, passing directness, receiving zones, line-breaking, creativity, territory (wide vs central)
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Retention
93
Dribbling
87
Defensive aggression
86
Press resistance ~proxy
85
Carrying
81
Build-up
79
Box threat
78
Ball-winning
60
Transition ~proxy
48
Progression
38
Crossing
35
Final-third threat
33
Through-balls ~proxy
26
Passing directness
20
Receiving zones
12
Line-breaking
11
Creativity
8
Territory (wide vs central)
5
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 179 cm / 72 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Adrian Beck Heidenheim · Bundesliga 25/26 · 186 cm / 75 kg
73%
Driven by: press resistance (22%), retention (14%), dribbling (14%). Different mechanism — Bragança more via box threat, build-up; Beck more via receiving zones, territory (wide vs central).
Yasin Ayari Brighton · Premier League · 172 cm / 69 kg
72%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (16%), creativity (13%), build-up (10%). Different mechanism — Bragança more via carrying, dribbling; Ayari more via receiving zones, creativity.
Scott McTominay Napoli · 193 cm / 88 kg
70%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (12%), retention (12%), line-breaking (11%). Different mechanism — Bragança more via ball-winning, defensive aggression; McTominay more via receiving zones, creativity.
Sergi Roberto Como 25/26 · 178 cm / 68 kg
69%
Driven by: retention (19%), build-up (16%), press resistance (16%). Different mechanism — Bragança more via defensive aggression, ball-winning; Roberto more via receiving zones, creativity.
Alpha Touré Metz · Ligue 1 25/26 · 180 cm
65%
Driven by: creativity (13%), press resistance (10%), line-breaking (10%). Different mechanism — Bragança more via box threat, defensive aggression; Touré more via territory (wide vs central).
Mandela Keita Parma Calcio 1913 · 180 cm / 78 kg
65%
Driven by: press resistance (13%), retention (12%), territory (wide vs central) (12%). Different mechanism — Bragança more via box threat, defensive aggression; Keita more via passing directness, creativity.
20

Summary

Daniel Bragança is a tempo controller / deep-lying playmaker: 2.6 progressive passes, 0.29 key passes /90, 3 box entries, 1 goals from 0.73 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.

Based on 6 matches (313 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a tempo controller / deep-lying playmaker — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall tempo controller profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report