Thin sample this season. Nick Woltemade has played 1 match (24 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
LINK
lay-off and combine
0 key passes · 80% completion · 5× in 1/1 matches
↓
FINISH
shoot from central zones
0.04 xG · 1× in 1/1 matches
Signature: Link → Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: receive / move — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); convert — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Juventus's output per match with Nick Woltemade (1 matches) versus without him (7 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 7 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (1)
WITHOUT (7)
Δ
goals for /match
2.00
1.43
+0.57
xG for /match
0.78
0.20
+0.57
goals against /match
0.00
2.00
-2.00
points /match
3.00
1.14
+1.86
03
His Share of the Team
Of everything Juventus produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Nick Woltemade specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
expected goals (xG)
14%
6.9 / 50.6
shots
8%
39 / 476
zone-14 entries
8%
21 / 268
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 299 strikers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
through-balls, box threat, territory (wide vs central)
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Receiving zones
79
Build-up
76
Retention
74
Ball-winning
70
Final-third threat
68
Press resistance ~proxy
64
Line-breaking
63
Creativity
63
Passing directness
59
Dribbling
56
Transition ~proxy
50
Defensive aggression
48
Progression
48
Crossing
48
Carrying
41
Through-balls ~proxy
39
Box threat
31
Territory (wide vs central)
20
05
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 198 cm / 90 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Joshua Zirkzee Man Utd · 193 cm / 84 kg
58%
Driven by: build-up (22%), receiving zones (17%), retention (10%). Different mechanism — Zirkzee more via through-balls, box threat.
Lucas Höler Freiburg · Bundesliga · 184 cm / 82 kg
57%
Driven by: build-up (28%), box threat (23%), ball-winning (22%). Different mechanism — Woltemade more via line-breaking, receiving zones; Höler more via territory (wide vs central).
Evanilson Bournemouth · 183 cm / 80 kg
56%
Driven by: retention (19%), territory (wide vs central) (19%), build-up (18%). Different mechanism — Woltemade more via passing directness, final-third threat.
Harry Kane Bayern · Bundesliga · 188 cm / 86 kg
56%
Driven by: build-up (22%), receiving zones (16%), retention (12%). Different mechanism — Woltemade more via defensive aggression, crossing; Kane more via box threat, through-balls.
Morgan Guilavogui Lens · Ligue 1 25/26 · 188 cm / 81 kg
54%
Driven by: build-up (21%), receiving zones (16%), retention (10%). Different mechanism — Guilavogui more via through-balls, territory (wide vs central).
Rômulo RBL · Bundesliga · 193 cm / 79 kg
53%
Driven by: build-up (30%), ball-winning (17%), retention (16%). Different mechanism — Woltemade more via passing directness, line-breaking; Rômulo more via box threat, territory (wide vs central).
06
Summary
Nick Woltemade is a false 9 / pressing forward: 0 goals from 0.04 xG (-0.04 vs expected), 1 shots, 0 box entries. Under-performing his chances. [Off-ball runs, aerials and hold-up under contact need tracking/aerial data.]
Based on 1 matches (24 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a false 9 / pressing forward — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is box threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall false 9 profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
← BACK TO SEARCH
