العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportSerie A 2026

El Bilal Touré

Parma Calcio 1913
Half-space creator CM
37% of actions in the half-spaces
Capability Analysis
Successful Dribble16%vs 30 central mids
"Can he beat a man in a straight 1v1?"
Successful take-ons /900.4330%
Take-on success23.08%3%
Progression3%vs 30 central mids
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /901.293%
Line-breaking passes /900.727%
Threat added by passing /900.26xT0%
Pass accuracy67.59%3%
Ball-Carrying11%vs 30 central mids
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /902.0110%
Carry distance /9043.41m0%
Successful take-ons /900.4330%
Take-on success23.08%3%
Chance Creation2%vs 30 central mids
"Does he create real chances for others?"
Expected assists /900.0xA0%
Through balls /900.00%
Threat added by passing /900.26xT0%
Box entries (pass) /900.5710%
central midtransition runnerprogressionbox-to-box
628
minutes
8 apps
4
progressive passes
0.6/90
68%
pass completion
108 passes
2
key passes
0.29/90
2
box entries
0.29/90
5
final-3rd entries
0.7/90
13
dribbles
23% won
45
possessions lost
1.69 danger/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Left Half-Space, Middle third — mostly in the middle third (52% of his 108 passes)
68% completion · 108× in 8/8 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive or pass into the final third
0.6 prog/90 · 4× in 3/8 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
0.29 key passes /90 · 0 goals · 14× in 2/8 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress → Create / Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: arrive — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
16

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
14
passes / match
1.9
dribbles / match
5–23
pass range (matches)
1–3
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (5 at the low end, 23 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

07

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

31 tracked carries (4.4/90, 4 progressive, 303m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

3%10%6%6%13%10%6%3%6%13%19%3%
progressivelateral/short% of his 31 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 25m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
3Outside → Inside
12Inside → Inside
12Outside → Outside
4Inside → Outside
First (18)Second (13)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

El Bilal Touré's signature is the dribble. Does he carry outside (down the left wing) or inside (into the half-space / centre)? Every dribble classified by channel. Season rate: 1.86 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 46%
OUTSIDE 54%
Dribble location — 6 inside · 7 outside
Right Wing
2 · 15%
Right Half-Space
2 · 15%
Central
1 · 8%
Left Half-Space
3 · 23%
Left Wing
5 · 38%
Vision AI 54% of his dribbles are in the wide left lane — he attacks the full-back on the outside, then threatens to cut inside onto his right foot.
02

How does he create chances?

2 key passes (0.29/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
50%50%
chance creation (2)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
11

Can he finish?

12 shots · 1.04 xG · 0 goals (-1.04 vs xG). Mostly right-footed. Circle size = xG.

shots  12
on target  7
goals  0
xG  1.04
xG on target  1.21
xG / shot  0.086
Where he shoots from — click an area of the box
08

Where does he become vulnerable?

45 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

19
attacking third (cheap)
22
middle third
4
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 42% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.69 danger-index/90 · 0.262 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
05

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where El Bilal Touré gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
14%
Primary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
13%
Secondary
Left Wing, Middle third
13%
Third
Central, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
06

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where El Bilal Touré actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
411201811310101310157127
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%3%6%11%5%1%2%9%9%8%2%2%10%16%15%1%
own goal left, attacking →
10

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

2Key pass
2Cross
3Cutback
4Progressive
4Long ball
1Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
11Outside → Inside
35Inside → Inside
16Outside → Outside
11Inside → Outside
By direction
34Forward
35Backward
39Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 2 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the central, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left half-space in the middle third: 47% of his 17 touches there are lost (8 times).
—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—4 touches · too few—6 touches · too few31%5/16 lost47%8/17 lost15%2/13 lost42%5/12 lost—7 touches · too few33%3/9 lost22%2/9 lost33%3/9 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
04

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 31 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he drives along the touchline (39%). He carries from outside into the middle 3 times and out toward the touchline 4 — a width-holder who drives down the line.
09

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
1 · 3%
Progressive / key pass
2 · 6%
Simple pass
19 · 61%
No clean link
9 · 29%
Of 31 carries, 3% flow straight into a shot of his own, 6% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 29% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

12

How & where does he defend?

110 defensive actions across the season (15.8/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
7
tackles · 86% won
2
interceptions · 0.3/90
24
recoveries · 3.4/90
5
clearances · 0.7/90
7
blocks
55
avg action height
42
won high (att 3rd)
43
middle third
25
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 33 proactive ball-wins (4.7/90), tackle success 86%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
13

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does El Bilal Touré keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 3.4, 2m)
0.12
0.0
0.00
0%
Mid press (PPDA 3.9, 2m)
0.45
0.8
1.64
0%
Low press (PPDA 5.2, 4m)
0.27
0.8
0.00
43%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

14

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: El Bilal Touré played nearly every Parma Calcio 1913 match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

15

His Share of the Team

Of everything Parma Calcio 1913 produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through El Bilal Touré specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
expected goals (xG)
5%
1.0 / 22.1
shots
4%
12 / 303
zone-14 entries
2%
3 / 126
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

17

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 382 central mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Transition runner50%Box-to-box runner23%Advanced playmaker (8)16%Deep-lying playmaker9%
Why Transition runner 50%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 81 (weight 30%) + box threat 74 (weight 25%) + transition 21 (weight 45%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
defensive aggression, box threat
Average
—
Weak
territory (wide vs central), crossing, through-balls, dribbling, receiving zones, passing directness, transition, press resistance, line-breaking, creativity, ball-winning, carrying, progression, retention, final-third threat, build-up
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Defensive aggression
81
Box threat
74
Territory (wide vs central)
37
Crossing
34
Through-balls ~proxy
24
Dribbling
24
Receiving zones
24
Passing directness
22
Transition ~proxy
21
Press resistance ~proxy
19
Line-breaking
15
Creativity
14
Ball-winning
14
Carrying
14
Progression
9
Retention
6
Final-third threat
4
Build-up
2
18

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 185 cm / 77 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Mario Martín Getafe · La Liga · 178 cm / 74 kg
90%
Driven by: creativity (10%), final-third threat (10%), retention (9%). Different mechanism — Touré more via box threat; Martín more via passing directness, ball-winning.
Davide Frattesi Lazio · 178 cm / 74 kg
89%
Driven by: build-up (13%), progression (11%), final-third threat (11%). Different mechanism — Touré more via territory (wide vs central); Frattesi more via ball-winning, retention.
Junior Dina Ebimbe Schalke · Bundesliga · 183 cm / 80 kg
88%
Driven by: final-third threat (12%), progression (10%), defensive aggression (9%). Different mechanism — Ebimbe more via ball-winning, build-up.
Luca Kerber Heidenheim · Bundesliga 25/26 · 180 cm / 77 kg
88%
Driven by: creativity (12%), final-third threat (10%), press resistance (10%). Different mechanism — Touré more via box threat, receiving zones; Kerber more via build-up, passing directness.
Giovanni Fabbian Parma Calcio 1913 · 186 cm / 75 kg
86%
Driven by: ball-winning (12%), final-third threat (10%), progression (10%). Different mechanism — Touré more via crossing, through-balls; Fabbian more via passing directness, build-up.
Louis Mouton Angers · Ligue 1 · 180 cm / 75 kg
86%
Driven by: retention (13%), final-third threat (11%), press resistance (10%). Different mechanism — Mouton more via creativity, build-up.
19

Summary

El Bilal Touré is a transition runner: 0.6 progressive passes, 0.29 key passes /90, 2 box entries, 0 goals from 1.04 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.

Based on 8 matches (628 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a transition runner — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall transition runner profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report