العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026
COV

Bobby Thomas

Coventry
Stopper centre-back CB
20.8 defensive actions/90 · 4.3 progressive/90 — defends first
Capability Analysis
Aerial & Box Defending48%vs 50 centre-backs
"Can he win the individual defensive battle in his own box?"
Aerial duels won /900.00%
Aerial win rate: 0.0%
Clearances /908.1296%
Ball-Winning59%vs 50 centre-backs
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /901.494%
Ball recoveries /903.352%
Tackles /900.638%
Duels won /903.382%
Breaking Pressure65%vs 45 centre-backs
"Can he retain and progress the ball while his own team is being pressed?"
Retention under pressure81.0%47%
Progressive passes while pressed1264%
Line-breaking passes while pressed478%
Progressive carries while pressed444%
Threat added while pressed (xT)2.99xT91%
Progression20%vs 50 centre-backs
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /902.1614%
Line-breaking passes /900.6338%
Threat added by passing /900.69xT16%
Pass accuracy78.52%12%
Ball-Carrying10%vs 50 centre-backs
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /902.9212%
Carry distance /9061.65m8%
centre-backstopper centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
709
minutes
8 apps
270
passes
79% completed
79%
pass completion
270 passes
34
progressive passes
4.3/90
40
line-breaking passes
5.1/90
164
defensive actions
20.8/90
16
tackles + interceptions
60% tackle win
64
clearances
8.1/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (50% of his 270 passes)
79% completion · 270× in 8/8 matches
↓
CARRY OUT
step into midfield to commit a presser
2 carries · 4× in 2/8 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
4.3 prog/90 · 40× in 8/8 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 7× in 4/8 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
3.0/90 · 24× in 8/8 matches
Signature: receive in the first line → break the midfield line vertically → switch or progress. Press him early and shut the vertical lane to force the safe sideways ball.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
34
passes / match
20.8
def actions / 90
21–63
pass range (matches)
64
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (21 at the low end, 63 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

08

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

63 tracked carries (8.0/90, 11 progressive, 486m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

5%27%17%3%2%2%17%17%3%2%3%2%
progressivelateral/short% of his 63 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 16m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
6Outside → Inside
42Inside → Inside
11Outside → Outside
4Inside → Outside
First (23)Second (17)Third (16)Fourth (7)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

5
tackle duels
3
won
2
beaten · 40%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 80%
OUTSIDE 20%
Tackle-duel location — 4 inside · 1 outside
Right Wing
1 · 20%
Right Half-Space
1 · 20%
Central
3 · 60%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 2 of 5 tackle duels (40% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 2 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

03

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

18%
vertical passes
31×
4%
switches
7×
33%
carries
57×
44%
short circulation
76×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW4825%1244%2131%15RHS10138%3815%1545%453%3C4423%1018%839%179%411%5LHS166%144%731%519%3LW3100%3FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right half-space in the middle third → central areas in the final third — 2 progressive passes (12% of his progression) at 0.184 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 59% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 12% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 7% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 5 line-breaking passes and 24 final-third entries, 3.8 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
6%21%21%11%3%0%1%9%12%2%3%2%0%1%3%0%1%1%
completedincomplete270 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
270
passes
79%
completed
58
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 79% season completion rate.
04

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

34
progressive · 4.3/90
24
final-third entries · 3.0/90
1
box entries · 0.13/90
11
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

How does he create chances?

2 key passes (0.25/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
50%50%
chance creation (2)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
05

Where does he become vulnerable?

59 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

16
attacking third (cheap)
27
middle third
16
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 27% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 3.10 danger-index/90 · 0.414 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
09

What is his passing profile?

270
passes attempted
53%
mostly forward
59%
mostly medium
Direction
Forward
142 · 53%
Sideways
64 · 24%
Backward
64 · 24%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
70 · 33%
Medium
125 · 59%
Long (>30m)
17 · 8%
10

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.370.280.240.240.230.20
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.37
Right Half-Space Mid third → Central Att third
2 passes
0.28
Right Wing Def third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.24
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Wing Att third
3 passes
0.24
Right Half-Space Def third → Right Wing Att third
1 passes
0.23
Right Half-Space Att third → Central Att third
1 passes
0.20
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes
06

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Bobby Thomas gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
22%
Primary
Right Half-Space, Middle third
19%
Secondary
Right Half-Space, Defensive third
12%
Third
Right Wing, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
07

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Bobby Thomas actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
14912232633710181758562991
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

6%21%21%11%3%0%1%9%12%2%3%2%0%1%3%0%1%1%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

2Key pass
2Cross
1Cutback
34Progressive
40Long ball
7Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
39Outside → Inside
104Inside → Inside
12Outside → Outside
57Inside → Outside
By direction
142Forward
64Backward
64Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays inside from the right hs toward the central, advancing it forward in the middle third — 2 passes worth 0.37 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 2 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the central in the final third — 2 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the final third: 60% of his 10 touches there are lost (6 times).
26%8/31 lost12%6/52 lost6%1/18 lost—5 touches · too few—1 touch · too few26%9/34 lost15%9/60 lost13%3/23 lost29%4/14 lost—4 touches · too few—2 touches · too few60%6/10 lost42%5/12 lost—4 touches · too few—0 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

164 defensive actions across the season (20.8/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
5
tackles · 60% won
11
interceptions · 1.4/90
26
recoveries · 3.3/90
64
clearances · 8.1/90
1
blocks
32
avg action height
25
won high (att 3rd)
34
middle third
105
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by clearing and blocking — a reactive, protect-the-box profile. 42 proactive ball-wins (5.3/90), tackle success 60%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
14

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Bobby Thomas still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 2.8, 2m)
62%
2.8
4.2
0.47
Mid press (PPDA 3.2, 2m)
75%
3.8
4.7
0.66
Low press (PPDA 5.0, 4m)
85%
5.5
5.8
0.84
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Bobby Thomas played nearly every Coventry match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Coventry produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Bobby Thomas specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
clearances
15%
64 / 420
interceptions
8%
11 / 137
shots
6%
14 / 222
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 513 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Stopper centre-back48%Ball-playing centre-back20%
Why Stopper centre-back 48%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 67 (weight 35%) + ball-winning 46 (weight 40%) + retention 22 (weight 15%) + transition 32 (weight 10%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
box threat
Strong
—
Average
defensive aggression, creativity, receiving zones, territory (wide vs central), ball-winning, final-third threat
Weak
dribbling, line-breaking, passing directness, press resistance, transition, build-up, retention, progression, carrying, crossing, through-balls
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Box threat
87
Defensive aggression
67
Creativity
64
Receiving zones
60
Territory (wide vs central)
52
Ball-winning
46
Final-third threat
41
Dribbling
40
Line-breaking
39
Passing directness
36
Press resistance ~proxy
34
Transition ~proxy
32
Build-up
32
Retention
22
Progression
21
Carrying
18
Crossing
11
Through-balls ~proxy
6
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 193 cm / 77 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Alan Matturro Levante · La Liga 25/26 · 189 cm / 74 kg
80%
Driven by: crossing (15%), progression (11%), through-balls (11%). Different mechanism — Thomas more via dribbling, receiving zones.
Fali Candé Sassuolo · Serie A · 184 cm / 82 kg
71%
Driven by: crossing (17%), carrying (15%), through-balls (13%). Different mechanism — Thomas more via box threat, dribbling; Candé more via territory (wide vs central).
Ayumu Seko Le Havre · Ligue 1 · 186 cm / 81 kg
69%
Driven by: build-up (13%), retention (13%), carrying (12%). Different mechanism — Thomas more via box threat, territory (wide vs central); Seko more via crossing, through-balls.
Arthur Chaves Augsburg · Bundesliga 25/26 · 188 cm / 80 kg
66%
Driven by: carrying (21%), progression (17%), transition (13%). Different mechanism — Thomas more via receiving zones, box threat; Chaves more via through-balls, crossing.
Nemanja Gudelj Getafe · La Liga · 187 cm / 79 kg
65%
Driven by: progression (21%), carrying (17%), transition (14%). Different mechanism — Thomas more via territory (wide vs central), line-breaking; Gudelj more via through-balls, crossing.
Danilho Doekhi Lazio · Serie A · 190 cm / 83 kg
65%
Driven by: box threat (28%), carrying (14%), defensive aggression (14%). Different mechanism — Doekhi more via through-balls, crossing.
20

Summary

Bobby Thomas is a stopper centre-back: 79% pass completion, 40 line-breaking passes and 4.3 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 8 matches (709 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a stopper centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is retention — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall stopper centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report