العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportSerie A 2026

Lewis Ferguson

Bologna
Half-space creator CM
46% of actions in the half-spaces
Capability Analysis
Successful Dribble18%vs 17 defensive mids
"Can he beat a man in a straight 1v1?"
Successful take-ons /900.1818%
Take-on success35.71%18%
Progression71%vs 17 defensive mids
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /904.3871%
Line-breaking passes /901.5271%
Threat added by passing /901.04xT65%
Pass accuracy88.2%76%
Ball-Carrying44%vs 17 defensive mids
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /905.0771%
Carry distance /90141.21m71%
Successful take-ons /900.1818%
Take-on success35.71%18%
Chance Creation37%vs 17 defensive mids
"Does he create real chances for others?"
Expected assists /900.04xA41%
Through balls /900.00%
Threat added by passing /901.04xT65%
Box entries (pass) /900.841%
central midtempo controllerprogressionbox-to-box
759
minutes
8 apps
53
progressive passes
6.3/90
91%
pass completion
609 passes
7
key passes
0.83/90
2
box entries
0.24/90
64
final-3rd entries
7.6/90
5
dribbles
40% won
57
possessions lost
2.75 danger/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Right Half-Space, Middle third — mostly in the middle third (67% of his 609 passes)
91% completion · 609× in 8/8 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive or pass into the final third
6.3 prog/90 · 53× in 8/8 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
0.83 key passes /90 · 0 goals · 10× in 5/8 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress → Create / Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: arrive — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
19

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
76
passes / match
1.2
dribbles / match
37–125
pass range (matches)
1–2
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (37 at the low end, 125 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

11

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

145 tracked carries (17.2/90, 40 progressive, 1498m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

1%5%16%8%1%1%9%16%7%1%1%6%12%13%4%1%
progressivelateral/short% of his 145 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 42m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
23Outside → Inside
80Inside → Inside
25Outside → Outside
17Inside → Outside
First (40)Second (39)Third (38)Fourth (28)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Only 5 dribbles attempted this season — too little volume to map a location pattern.

06

How does he build & move the ball?

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW11453%6036%4111%121%1RHS14648%7023%3323%345%81%1C10517%1825%2635%3720%213%3LHS1141%19%1025%2831%3535%40LW7612%930%2358%44FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right wing in the middle third → the right half-space in the middle third — 5 progressive passes (10% of his progression) at 0.009 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 50% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 10% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 7% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 17 line-breaking passes and 64 final-third entries, 5.9 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
2%8%14%12%4%2%0%6%13%7%1%0%0%2%9%11%6%1%
completedincomplete609 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
609
passes
91%
completed
54
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 91% season completion rate.
02

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

53
progressive · 6.3/90
64
final-third entries · 7.6/90
2
box entries · 0.24/90
27
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
04

How does he create chances?

7 key passes (0.83/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
43%14%29%14%
chance creation (7)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
13

Where does he become vulnerable?

57 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

12
attacking third (cheap)
27
middle third
18
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 21% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.75 danger-index/90 · 0.407 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
12

What is his passing profile?

609
passes attempted
45%
mostly forward
51%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
273 · 45%
Sideways
177 · 29%
Backward
159 · 26%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
285 · 51%
Medium
252 · 45%
Long (>30m)
18 · 3%
07

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.560.510.310.250.240.20
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.56
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Wing Mid third
11 passes
0.51
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Half-Space Att third
3 passes
0.31
Right Half-Space Att third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.25
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
2 passes
0.24
Left Half-Space Mid third → Central Mid third
2 passes
0.20
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Half-Space Mid third
2 passes
09

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Lewis Ferguson gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
17%
Primary
Right Half-Space, Middle third
14%
Secondary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
14%
Third
Central, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
10

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Lewis Ferguson actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
1155469397137824592114887712613
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

2%8%14%12%4%2%0%6%13%7%1%0%0%2%9%11%6%1%
own goal left, attacking →
14

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

7Key pass
4Cross
1Cutback
53Progressive
31Long ball
12Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
86Outside → Inside
232Inside → Inside
104Outside → Outside
133Inside → Outside
By direction
273Forward
159Backward
177Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches it out from the right hs to the right wing in the middle third — 11 passes worth 0.56 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 7 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the right wing in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the final third: 20% of his 25 touches there are lost (5 times).
19%5/27 lost15%6/39 lost8%2/25 lost19%3/16 lost—3 touches · too few3%2/74 lost5%5/106 lost12%10/86 lost3%3/88 lost12%6/51 lost20%5/25 lost14%2/14 lost—6 touches · too few6%1/17 lost9%3/32 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
05

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 145 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he carries through central areas (55%). He carries from outside into the middle 23 times and out toward the touchline 17 — a genuine inside forward who cuts in with the ball.
08

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
1 · 1%
Progressive / key pass
10 · 7%
Simple pass
127 · 88%
No clean link
7 · 5%
Of 145 carries, 1% flow straight into a shot of his own, 7% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 5% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

15

How & where does he defend?

123 defensive actions across the season (14.6/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
20
tackles · 55% won
6
interceptions · 0.7/90
29
recoveries · 3.4/90
16
clearances · 1.9/90
5
blocks
36
avg action height
8
won high (att 3rd)
57
middle third
58
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 55 proactive ball-wins (6.5/90), tackle success 55%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
16

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Lewis Ferguson keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 2.8, 2m)
0.73
2.8
0.00
0%
Mid press (PPDA 4.3, 2m)
1.56
8.1
0.48
100%
Low press (PPDA 9.0, 4m)
1.82
7.1
1.42
100%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

17

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Lewis Ferguson played nearly every Bologna match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

18

His Share of the Team

Of everything Bologna produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Lewis Ferguson specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
final-third entries
9%
160 / 1769
half-space entries
9%
86 / 971
zone-14 entries
8%
18 / 213
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

20

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 382 central mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Tempo controller75%Deep-lying playmaker73%Transition runner51%Box-to-box runner50%
Why Tempo controller 75%: a weighted blend of retention 75 (weight 35%) + build-up 87 (weight 30%) + progression 62 (weight 15%) + press resistance 45 (weight 20%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
build-up
Strong
retention
Average
defensive aggression, carrying, progression, receiving zones, crossing, final-third threat, line-breaking, transition, creativity, press resistance, ball-winning, territory (wide vs central), passing directness
Weak
box threat, through-balls, dribbling
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Build-up
87
Retention
75
Defensive aggression
70
Carrying
66
Progression
62
Receiving zones
60
Crossing
58
Final-third threat
55
Line-breaking
52
Transition ~proxy
52
Creativity
45
Press resistance ~proxy
45
Ball-winning
44
Territory (wide vs central)
43
Passing directness
41
Box threat
26
Through-balls ~proxy
26
Dribbling
17
21

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 181 cm / 73 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Denis Huseinbasic Koln · Bundesliga 25/26 · 184 cm / 77 kg
72%
Driven by: build-up (29%), dribbling (16%), box threat (15%). Different mechanism — Ferguson more via territory (wide vs central), line-breaking.
Marc Casadó Deportivo · La Liga · 171 cm / 65 kg
70%
Driven by: build-up (35%), dribbling (22%), retention (9%). Different mechanism — Ferguson more via territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression; Casadó more via receiving zones.
Stanislav Lobotka Napoli · 168 cm / 68 kg
62%
Driven by: build-up (31%), box threat (18%), retention (16%). Different mechanism — Ferguson more via territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression; Lobotka more via passing directness, receiving zones.
Gavi Barcelona · La Liga · 174 cm / 69 kg
61%
Driven by: dribbling (23%), box threat (18%), build-up (16%). Different mechanism — Ferguson more via crossing, carrying; Gavi more via receiving zones.
Remo Freuler Bologna 25/26 · 180 cm / 77 kg
58%
Driven by: dribbling (27%), build-up (26%), box threat (17%). Different mechanism — Ferguson more via crossing, carrying; Freuler more via passing directness, ball-winning.
Máximo Perrone Como · 177 cm / 72 kg
58%
Driven by: build-up (42%), retention (18%), dribbling (15%). Different mechanism — Ferguson more via territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression; Perrone more via passing directness, receiving zones.
22

Summary

Lewis Ferguson is a tempo controller / deep-lying playmaker: 6.3 progressive passes, 0.83 key passes /90, 2 box entries, 0 goals from 0.64 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.

Based on 8 matches (759 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a tempo controller / deep-lying playmaker — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is press resistance — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall tempo controller profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report