العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026

Sávio

Tottenham
Advanced playmaker AM
2.83 key passes/90 · 0.46 xT/90
attacking midadvanced playmaker (8)creationbetween the lines
350
minutes
4 apps
11
key passes
2.83/90
2
progressive passes
0.5/90
3
box entries
0.77/90
2
final-3rd entries
0.5/90
0
goals
0.76 xG
38
dribbles
47% won
73%
pass completion
153 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Sávio has played 4 matches (350 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Right Wing, Attacking third — between the lines — mostly in the attacking third (77% of his 153 passes)
73% completion · 153× in 4/4 matches
↓
TURN / BEAT MAN
face forward in the pocket
47% won · 38× in 4/4 matches
↓
CREATE
through-ball, cut-back, key pass
2.83/90 · 11× in 4/4 matches
↓
FINISH
arrive and shoot from central zones
0 goals · 0.76 xG · 8× in 4/4 matches
Signature: receive between the lines → turn → create or finish.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
38
passes / match
9.5
dribbles / match
22–53
pass range (matches)
7–12
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (22 at the low end, 53 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

06

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

53 tracked carries (13.6/90, 17 progressive, 594m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

2%4%13%42%6%2%4%2%6%15%6%
progressivelateral/short% of his 53 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 9m, longest 28m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
19Outside → Inside
6Inside → Inside
27Outside → Outside
1Inside → Outside
First (20)Second (16)Third (14)Fourth (3)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Does he carry to create or drift wide? Dribbles by channel. Season rate: 9.77 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 37%
OUTSIDE 63%
Dribble location — 14 inside · 24 outside
Right Wing
18 · 47%
Right Half-Space
8 · 21%
Central
2 · 5%
Left Half-Space
4 · 11%
Left Wing
6 · 16%
Vision AI His carries cluster wide — a drifting playmaker.
13

How does he build & move the ball?

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW5944%2646%2710%6RHS1136%445%518%2C520%180%4LHS1338%531%431%4LW234%143%1052%12FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right wing in the final third → the right half-space in the final third — 6 progressive passes (26% of his progression) at 0.076 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 83% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 0% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

9% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.

Quality behind the volume: 9 line-breaking passes and 2 final-third entries, 1.8 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
2%3%9%25%18%1%2%3%3%1%1%3%14%13%
completedincomplete153 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
153
passes
73%
completed
42
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 73% season completion rate.
02

How does he create chances?

11 key passes (2.83/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
11%11%11%33%33%
chance creation (9)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (6)from the right (3)of 9 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
10

Where does he become vulnerable?

62 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

52
attacking third (cheap)
8
middle third
2
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 84% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.82 danger-index/90 · 0.114 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
11

What is his passing profile?

153
passes attempted
49%
mostly sideways
68%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
25 · 16%
Sideways
75 · 49%
Backward
53 · 35%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
75 · 68%
Medium
32 · 29%
Long (>30m)
4 · 4%
04

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Sávio gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
34%
Primary
Right Wing, Attacking third
14%
Secondary
Left Half-Space, Attacking third
14%
Third
Right Half-Space, Attacking third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
05

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Sávio actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
22626251436847165435
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

2%3%9%25%18%1%2%3%3%1%1%3%14%13%
own goal left, attacking →
12

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

11Key pass
2Cross
11Cutback
2Progressive
9Long ball
3Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
44Outside → Inside
25Inside → Inside
38Outside → Outside
4Inside → Outside
By direction
25Forward
53Backward
75Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
08

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 11 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the left hs toward the central in the final third — 3 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the final third: 57% of his 21 touches there are lost (12 times).
—3 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few6%1/18 lost—2 touches · too few—4 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—6 touches · too few20%10/49 lost57%12/21 lost—4 touches · too few54%13/24 lost15%3/20 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
07

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 53 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he drives along the touchline (51%). He carries from outside into the middle 19 times and out toward the touchline 1 — a genuine inside forward who cuts in with the ball.
03

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
0 · 0%
Progressive / key pass
11 · 21%
Simple pass
23 · 43%
No clean link
19 · 36%
Of 53 carries, 0% flow straight into a shot of his own, 21% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 36% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
09

Crosses & Cutbacks

2 crosses (0.51/90, 2 completed) and 11 cutbacks (2.83/90, 4 completed) — two separate wide-delivery patterns into the box, each its own map with a completed/failed filter. Neither is a tagged event, so both are inferred from pass geometry — the intended end point of a failed attempt is still real data (an interception doesn’t erase where the ball was aimed): a cross is a pass aimed into the box starting from a wide channel; a cutback starts almost on the byline but is squared back rather than driven forward, aimed centrally around the box. The completed-cross count was checked against this platform’s own real match-level cross totals and lands within about 1 cross of the true count.

Crosses — close-up on the final third
Cutbacks — close-up on the final third
completedfailed (dashed)close-up on the box — attacking ↑ toward goal
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

14

How & where does he defend?

31 defensive actions across the season (8.0/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
0
tackles · 0% won
2
interceptions · 0.5/90
13
recoveries · 3.3/90
0
clearances · 0.0/90
2
blocks
67
avg action height
19
won high (att 3rd)
9
middle third
3
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 15 proactive ball-wins (3.9/90), tackle success 0%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

25
attacking-half actions · 6.43/90
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Tottenham's output per match with Sávio (4 matches) versus without him (4 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 4 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (4)
WITHOUT (4)
Δ
goals for /match
0.75
1.25
-0.50
xG for /match
1.14
0.00
+1.14
goals against /match
1.00
1.50
-0.50
points /match
0.75
1.50
-0.75
16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Tottenham produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Sávio specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
half-space entries
5%
61 / 1256
expected goals (xG)
5%
2.0 / 41.1
successful take-ons
5%
17 / 368
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 247 attacking mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Advanced playmaker (8)74%Half-space creator64%
Why Advanced playmaker (8) 74%: a weighted blend of creativity 67 (weight 35%) + progression 92 (weight 25%) + final-third threat 61 (weight 25%) + box threat 58 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
territory (wide vs central), line-breaking, carrying, through-balls, progression
Strong
crossing
Average
creativity, receiving zones, final-third threat, transition, box threat, dribbling, ball-winning, retention, build-up, press resistance
Weak
defensive aggression, passing directness
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Territory (wide vs central)
98
Line-breaking
97
Carrying
95
Through-balls ~proxy
93
Progression
92
Crossing
84
Creativity
67
Receiving zones
64
Final-third threat
61
Transition ~proxy
60
Box threat
58
Dribbling
53
Ball-winning
46
Retention
44
Build-up
43
Press resistance ~proxy
43
Defensive aggression
15
Passing directness
5
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 179 cm / 66 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Samuel Chukwueze AC Milan · Serie A · 172 cm / 70 kg
86%
Driven by: defensive aggression (20%), territory (wide vs central) (14%), progression (12%). Different mechanism — Savinho more via carrying, box threat; Chukwueze more via build-up, passing directness.
Pedro Neto Chelsea · 174 cm / 78 kg
84%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (15%), progression (14%), carrying (13%). Different mechanism — Savinho more via ball-winning; Neto more via press resistance, dribbling.
Robert Navarro Athletic Club · La Liga · 178 cm / 65 kg
78%
Driven by: line-breaking (19%), progression (16%), carrying (16%). Different mechanism — Savinho more via crossing, territory (wide vs central); Navarro more via passing directness, defensive aggression.
Mathys Tel Tottenham · 183 cm / 77 kg
77%
Driven by: carrying (18%), territory (wide vs central) (17%), passing directness (14%). Different mechanism — Savinho more via line-breaking, creativity; Tel more via dribbling, defensive aggression.
Kamaldeen Sulemana Atalanta · Serie A 25/26 · 175 cm / 70 kg
71%
Driven by: carrying (20%), passing directness (16%), defensive aggression (12%). Different mechanism — Savinho more via territory (wide vs central), line-breaking; Sulemana more via retention, press resistance.
Robin Hack Borussia Monchengladbach · Bundesliga · 178 cm / 68 kg
70%
Driven by: progression (19%), through-balls (14%), defensive aggression (13%). Different mechanism — Savinho more via territory (wide vs central), carrying; Hack more via passing directness, final-third threat.
20

Summary

Sávio is an advanced playmaker (8) / half-space creator: 2.83 key passes /90, 0.5 progressive passes, 0 goals from 0.76 xG. A between-the-lines creator. [Off-ball movement into pockets needs tracking.]

Based on 4 matches (350 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as an advanced playmaker (8) / half-space creator — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is box threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall advanced playmaker (8) profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report