العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLigue 1 2026
TRO

Jérémy Le Douaron

Troyes
Complete forward ST
3.1 shots/90 with 1.12 key passes/90
strikerpressing forwardbox threatfinishing
322
minutes
6 apps
1
goals
1.37 xG
1.4
xG
11 shots
11
shots
0.12 xG/shot
0
box entries
0.00/90
4
key passes
1.12/90
3
dribbles
67% won
54%
pass completion
69 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

LINK
lay-off and combine
4 key passes · 54% completion · 69× in 6/6 matches
↓
FINISH
shoot from central zones
1.37 xG · 11× in 4/6 matches
Signature: Link → Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: receive / move — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); convert — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

03

How does he create chances?

4 key passes (1.12/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
50%25%25%
chance creation (4)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (0)from the right (4)of 4 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
04

Where does he become vulnerable?

33 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

21
attacking third (cheap)
12
middle third
0
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 64% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.69 danger-index/90 · 0.183 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 4 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right hs toward the central in the final third — 2 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the final third: 62% of his 16 touches there are lost (10 times).
—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—7 touches · too few—5 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—7 touches · too few—6 touches · too few25%2/8 lost62%10/16 lost—5 touches · too few—6 touches · too few—5 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

06

How & where does he defend?

66 defensive actions across the season (18.4/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
4
tackles · 50% won
0
interceptions · 0.0/90
7
recoveries · 2.0/90
0
clearances · 0.0/90
0
blocks
63
avg action height
26
won high (att 3rd)
35
middle third
5
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 11 proactive ball-wins (3.1/90), tackle success 50%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

53
attacking-half actions · 14.81/90
05

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Jérémy Le Douaron keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-2 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 3.8, 2m)
0.06
0.0
0.53
67%
Mid press (PPDA 4.2, 2m)
0.04
0.0
2.39
0%
Low press (PPDA 5.6, 2m)
0.17
2.3
0.00
0%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

07

Impact on the Team

Troyes's output per match with Jérémy Le Douaron (6 matches) versus without him (2 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 2 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (6)
WITHOUT (2)
Δ
goals for /match
0.50
1.00
-0.50
xG for /match
1.11
0.00
+1.11
goals against /match
2.50
0.50
+2.00
points /match
0.17
2.00
-1.83
08

His Share of the Team

Of everything Troyes produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Jérémy Le Douaron specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
expected goals (xG)
12%
1.4 / 11.0
shots
8%
11 / 131
zone-14 entries
6%
4 / 65
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

09

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 354 strikers in the pool (min 180 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Pressing forward72%Transition runner65%Poacher53%Target man45%
Why Pressing forward 72%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 93 (weight 45%) + ball-winning 45 (weight 30%) + transition 31 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
defensive aggression
Strong
territory (wide vs central), box threat
Average
dribbling, creativity, crossing, press resistance, receiving zones, ball-winning
Weak
passing directness, transition, retention, carrying, build-up, final-third threat, through-balls, progression, line-breaking
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Defensive aggression
93
Territory (wide vs central)
81
Box threat
71
Dribbling
68
Creativity
64
Crossing
52
Press resistance ~proxy
51
Receiving zones
49
Ball-winning
45
Passing directness
34
Transition ~proxy
31
Retention
25
Carrying
24
Build-up
20
Final-third threat
18
Through-balls ~proxy
14
Progression
9
Line-breaking
7
10

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 189 cm / 78 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Beto Fiorentina · Premier League · 194 cm / 88 kg
82%
Driven by: defensive aggression (18%), progression (13%), build-up (12%). Different mechanism — Douaron more via creativity, territory (wide vs central).
Thierno Barry Everton · Premier League · 195 cm / 82 kg
80%
Driven by: defensive aggression (23%), line-breaking (13%), progression (12%). Different mechanism — Douaron more via creativity, box threat; Barry more via carrying.
Kike García Espanyol · La Liga 25/26 · 186 cm / 79 kg
72%
Driven by: defensive aggression (27%), build-up (16%), line-breaking (14%). Different mechanism — Douaron more via territory (wide vs central), crossing; García more via carrying, final-third threat.
Ragnar Ache Koln · Bundesliga · 183 cm / 81 kg
69%
Driven by: build-up (22%), progression (14%), line-breaking (13%). Different mechanism — Douaron more via territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression; Ache more via passing directness, final-third threat.
Olivier Giroud Lille · 193 cm / 91 kg
65%
Driven by: progression (18%), carrying (13%), line-breaking (13%). Different mechanism — Douaron more via territory (wide vs central), dribbling; Giroud more via build-up.
Rodrigo Ribeiro Augsburg · Bundesliga · 185 cm / 72 kg
63%
Driven by: defensive aggression (22%), line-breaking (15%), through-balls (12%). Different mechanism — Douaron more via territory (wide vs central), creativity; Ribeiro more via carrying, retention.
11

Summary

Jérémy Le Douaron is a pressing forward / transition runner: 1 goals from 1.37 xG (-0.37 vs expected), 11 shots, 0 box entries. Under-performing his chances. [Off-ball runs, aerials and hold-up under contact need tracking/aerial data.]

Based on 6 matches (322 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a pressing forward / transition runner — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall pressing forward profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report