Thin sample this season. Mohamed-Ali Cho has played 1 match (35 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Right Wing, Attacking third — between the lines — mostly in the attacking third (80% of his 10 passes)
90% completion · 10× in 1/1 matches
↓
FINISH
arrive and shoot from central zones
0 goals · 0.03 xG · 1× in 1/1 matches
Signature: Receive → Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: turn / beat man — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); create — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Hull City's output per match with Mohamed-Ali Cho (1 matches) versus without him (7 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 7 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (1)
WITHOUT (7)
Δ
goals for /match
0.00
1.14
-1.14
xG for /match
0.94
0.00
+0.94
goals against /match
0.00
1.43
-1.43
points /match
1.00
1.43
-0.43
03
His Share of the Team
Of everything Hull City produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Mohamed-Ali Cho specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
14%
20 / 139
expected goals (xG)
14%
3.8 / 26.4
shots
14%
37 / 262
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 247 attacking mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Half-space creator45%Advanced playmaker (8)44%
Why Half-space creator 45%: a weighted blend of creativity 53 (weight 40%) + final-third threat 42 (weight 30%) + box threat 50 (weight 15%) + dribbling 33 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Carrying
61
Through-balls ~proxy
58
Defensive aggression
58
Crossing
55
Creativity
53
Box threat
50
Transition ~proxy
43
Final-third threat
42
Receiving zones
42
Progression
38
Retention
37
Press resistance ~proxy
35
Line-breaking
35
Build-up
35
Dribbling
33
Territory (wide vs central)
33
Passing directness
23
Ball-winning
19
05
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 182 cm / 66 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Mert Kömür Augsburg · Bundesliga · 183 cm / 77 kg
66%
Driven by: ball-winning (26%), line-breaking (11%), progression (10%). Different mechanism — Cho more via carrying, through-balls; Kömür more via passing directness.
Unai Gómez Udinese · Serie A · 183 cm / 75 kg
62%
Driven by: ball-winning (24%), passing directness (11%), build-up (9%). Different mechanism — Cho more via through-balls, carrying.
Iñaki Williams Athletic Club · La Liga · 186 cm / 81 kg
59%
Driven by: ball-winning (26%), build-up (16%), press resistance (13%). Different mechanism — Cho more via carrying, crossing; Williams more via passing directness, box threat.
Bryan Mbeumo Man Utd · Premier League · 171 cm / 64 kg
58%
Driven by: ball-winning (28%), passing directness (15%), dribbling (12%). Different mechanism — Cho more via carrying, transition; Mbeumo more via box threat, territory (wide vs central).
Takuma Asano Mallorca · La Liga 25/26 · 173 cm / 71 kg
58%
Driven by: press resistance (13%), build-up (13%), passing directness (13%). Different mechanism — Cho more via through-balls, crossing; Asano more via territory (wide vs central), ball-winning.
Alfon González Sevilla · La Liga · 172 cm / 60 kg
56%
Driven by: ball-winning (31%), dribbling (11%), build-up (10%). Different mechanism — Cho more via carrying, through-balls; González more via territory (wide vs central).
06
Summary
Mohamed-Ali Cho is a half-space creator: 0.00 key passes /90, 0.0 progressive passes, 0 goals from 0.03 xG. A between-the-lines creator. [Off-ball movement into pockets needs tracking.]
Based on 1 matches (35 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a half-space creator — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is dribbling — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall half-space creator profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
← BACK TO SEARCH
