العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026

Christos Tzolis

Arsenal
Creative wide forward W
1.97 key passes/90 · 27% in the half-space
left winger1v1 carriercuts insidehalf-space creator
366
minutes
5 apps
0
goals
0.27 xG
9
dribbles
11% won
8
key passes
1.97/90
6
box entries
1.48/90
3
progressive passes
0.7/90
3
final-3rd entries
0.7/90
80%
pass completion
151 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Left Wing, Attacking third — mostly in the attacking third (58% of his 151 passes)
67% of touches wide left · 151× in 5/5 matches
↓
CARRY / BEAT MAN
dribble past the full-back, cut inside
11% won · 9× in 3/5 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
1.97 key passes /90 · 0 goals · 12× in 3/5 matches
Signature: Receive → Carry / Beat Man → Create / Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: progress — 3× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
30
passes / match
3.0
dribbles / match
15–46
pass range (matches)
2–4
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (15 at the low end, 46 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

06

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

54 tracked carries (13.3/90, 19 progressive, 656m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

2%4%2%9%22%46%15%
progressivelateral/short% of his 54 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 10m, longest 40m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
18Outside → Inside
7Inside → Inside
28Outside → Outside
1Inside → Outside
First (25)Second (12)Third (9)Fourth (8)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Christos Tzolis's signature is the dribble. Does he carry outside (down the left wing) or inside (into the half-space / centre)? Every dribble classified by channel. Season rate: 2.21 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 33%
OUTSIDE 67%
Dribble location — 3 inside · 6 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
1 · 11%
Left Half-Space
2 · 22%
Left Wing
6 · 67%
Vision AI 67% of his dribbles are in the wide left lane — he attacks the full-back on the outside, then threatens to cut inside onto his right foot.
13

How does he build & move the ball?

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW250%150%1RHS2100%2C1118%218%227%39%127%3LHS2548%1240%1012%3LW8112%1056%4532%26FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the left wing in the final third → the left half-space in the final third — 8 progressive passes (32% of his progression) at 0.042 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 88% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 4% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 4% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 12 line-breaking passes and 3 final-third entries, 0.9 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
1%1%1%2%2%3%4%1%1%5%10%19%30%20%
completedincomplete151 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
151
passes
80%
completed
30
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 80% season completion rate.
02

How does he create chances?

8 key passes (1.97/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
12%50%38%
chance creation (8)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (7)from the right (1)of 8 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
10

Where does he become vulnerable?

38 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

25
attacking third (cheap)
8
middle third
5
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 66% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.91 danger-index/90 · 0.204 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
11

What is his passing profile?

151
passes attempted
41%
mostly backward
55%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
30 · 20%
Sideways
59 · 39%
Backward
62 · 41%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
66 · 55%
Medium
49 · 40%
Long (>30m)
6 · 5%
04

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Christos Tzolis gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
38%
Primary
Left Wing, Attacking third
21%
Secondary
Left Wing, Middle third
14%
Third
Left Half-Space, Attacking third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
05

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Christos Tzolis actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
281628503333484122
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%1%1%2%2%3%4%1%1%5%10%19%30%20%
own goal left, attacking →
12

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

8Key pass
4Cross
8Cutback
3Progressive
10Long ball
3Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
56Outside → Inside
30Inside → Inside
27Outside → Outside
8Inside → Outside
By direction
30Forward
62Backward
59Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
08

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 8 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the left wing toward the left hs in the final third — 3 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left half-space in the final third: 35% of his 20 touches there are lost (7 times).
—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—3 touches · too few25%2/8 lost—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—5 touches · too few17%2/12 lost12%4/33 lost—2 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—6 touches · too few35%7/20 lost18%10/56 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
07

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 54 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he drives along the touchline (52%). He carries from outside into the middle 18 times and out toward the touchline 1 — a genuine inside forward who cuts in with the ball.
09

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
1 · 2%
Progressive / key pass
13 · 24%
Simple pass
31 · 57%
No clean link
9 · 17%
Of 54 carries, 2% flow straight into a shot of his own, 24% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 17% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
03

Crosses & Cutbacks

4 crosses (0.98/90, 3 completed) and 8 cutbacks (1.97/90, 6 completed) — two separate wide-delivery patterns into the box, each its own map with a completed/failed filter. Neither is a tagged event, so both are inferred from pass geometry — the intended end point of a failed attempt is still real data (an interception doesn’t erase where the ball was aimed): a cross is a pass aimed into the box starting from a wide channel; a cutback starts almost on the byline but is squared back rather than driven forward, aimed centrally around the box. The completed-cross count was checked against this platform’s own real match-level cross totals and lands within about 1 cross of the true count.

Crosses — close-up on the final third
Cutbacks — close-up on the final third
completedfailed (dashed)close-up on the box — attacking ↑ toward goal
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

14

How & where does he defend?

48 defensive actions across the season (11.8/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
4
tackles · 100% won
2
interceptions · 0.5/90
12
recoveries · 3.0/90
5
clearances · 1.2/90
2
blocks
45
avg action height
11
won high (att 3rd)
19
middle third
18
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 18 proactive ball-wins (4.4/90), tackle success 100%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

17
attacking-half actions · 4.18/90
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Arsenal's output per match with Christos Tzolis (5 matches) versus without him (3 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 3 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (5)
WITHOUT (3)
Δ
goals for /match
1.60
1.67
-0.07
xG for /match
1.53
0.00
+1.53
goals against /match
0.80
0.33
+0.47
points /match
2.40
3.00
-0.60
16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Arsenal produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Christos Tzolis specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
half-space entries
2%
32 / 1722
box entries
2%
14 / 783
progressive passes
1%
25 / 1904
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 235 wingers in the pool (min 180 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Half-space creator48%Pressing forward45%Transition runner42%Wide dribbler / isolator37%
Why Half-space creator 48%: a weighted blend of final-third threat 75 (weight 30%) + creativity 56 (weight 40%) + box threat 23 (weight 15%) + dribbling 4 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
crossing, progression, line-breaking, through-balls, receiving zones
Strong
territory (wide vs central), final-third threat, carrying, build-up
Average
retention, creativity, transition, defensive aggression, ball-winning
Weak
press resistance, passing directness, box threat, dribbling
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Crossing
93
Progression
91
Line-breaking
89
Through-balls ~proxy
87
Receiving zones
86
Territory (wide vs central)
78
Final-third threat
75
Carrying
73
Build-up
72
Retention
63
Creativity
56
Transition ~proxy
53
Defensive aggression
50
Ball-winning
40
Press resistance ~proxy
29
Passing directness
26
Box threat
23
Dribbling
4
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 179 cm / 70 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Hugo Álvarez Celta Vigo · La Liga · 176 cm / 72 kg
79%
Driven by: dribbling (18%), build-up (11%), crossing (11%). Different mechanism — Tzolis more via territory (wide vs central), carrying; Álvarez more via passing directness, creativity.
Hugo Picard Troyes · Ligue 1 · 168 cm / 68 kg
77%
Driven by: dribbling (20%), crossing (19%), press resistance (10%). Different mechanism — Tzolis more via territory (wide vs central), build-up; Picard more via ball-winning, defensive aggression.
Jack Grealish Everton · 180 cm / 77 kg
72%
Driven by: progression (15%), dribbling (12%), receiving zones (11%). Different mechanism — Tzolis more via through-balls, crossing; Grealish more via creativity, ball-winning.
Lucas Vázquez Leverkusen · Bundesliga · 173 cm / 70 kg
70%
Driven by: dribbling (21%), build-up (13%), box threat (10%). Different mechanism — Tzolis more via carrying, receiving zones.
Noa Lang Napoli · Serie A · 176 cm / 70 kg
69%
Driven by: dribbling (19%), crossing (13%), progression (13%). Different mechanism — Tzolis more via retention, build-up; Lang more via passing directness, box threat.
Armand Laurienté Sassuolo · Serie A · 171 cm / 59 kg
64%
Driven by: crossing (16%), dribbling (14%), progression (13%). Different mechanism — Tzolis more via territory (wide vs central), build-up; Laurienté more via box threat, passing directness.
20

Summary

Christos Tzolis is a wide, outside-first left carrier: 67% of dribbles in the wing lane, 66% of passes from wide — but 71% land inside. 0.7 progressive passes and 1.97 key passes /90 plus 0 goals from 0.27 xG. A carry-and-deliver threat.

Based on 5 matches (366 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a half-space creator — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is dribbling — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall half-space creator profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report