العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLigue 1 2026

Andrew Omobamidele

Strasbourg
Stopper centre-back CB
11.1 defensive actions/90 · 2.8 progressive/90 — defends first
centre-backball-playing centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
194
minutes
2 apps
99
passes
97% completed
97%
pass completion
99 passes
6
progressive passes
2.8/90
0
line-breaking passes
0.0/90
24
defensive actions
11.1/90
7
tackles + interceptions
60% tackle win
9
clearances
4.2/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Andrew Omobamidele has played 2 matches (194 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (55% of his 99 passes)
97% completion · 99× in 2/2 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
1.9/90 · 4× in 2/2 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: carry out — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); break a line — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); switch play — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

03

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

39 tracked carries (18.1/90, 7 progressive, 320m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

5%18%13%3%8%15%10%3%10%15%
progressivelateral/short% of his 39 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 21m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
3Outside → Inside
29Inside → Inside
1Outside → Outside
6Inside → Outside
First (14)Second (13)Third (12)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

5
tackle duels
3
won
2
beaten · 40%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 100%
OUTSIDE 0%
Tackle-duel location — 5 inside · 0 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
1 · 20%
Central
2 · 40%
Left Half-Space
2 · 40%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 2 of 5 tackle duels (40% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 0 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

04

How does he create chances?

0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches it out from the right hs to the right wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 2 passes worth 0.11 xT.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the defensive third: 10% of his 10 touches there are lost (1 times).
—5 touches · too few10%1/10 lost0%0/9 lost6%1/16 lost—4 touches · too few—4 touches · too few0%0/9 lost0%0/25 lost7%1/15 lost—1 touch · too few—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

05

How & where does he defend?

24 defensive actions across the season (11.1/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
5
tackles · 60% won
2
interceptions · 0.9/90
6
recoveries · 2.8/90
9
clearances · 4.2/90
0
blocks
24
avg action height
1
won high (att 3rd)
5
middle third
18
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 13 proactive ball-wins (6.0/90), tackle success 60%. He defends deep, protecting his box — a last-line stopper.
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

06

Impact on the Team

Strasbourg's output per match with Andrew Omobamidele (2 matches) versus without him (6 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 6 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (2)
WITHOUT (6)
Δ
goals against /match
2.50
2.17
+0.33
points /match
1.50
0.67
+0.83
goals for /match
1.00
1.67
-0.67
xG for /match
0.95
0.00
+0.95
07

His Share of the Team

Of everything Strasbourg produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Andrew Omobamidele specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
clearances
14%
82 / 584
interceptions
9%
19 / 220
threat added by passing (xT)
7%
16.7 / 246.2
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

08

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 515 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Ball-playing centre-back70%Stopper centre-back30%
Why Ball-playing centre-back 70%: a weighted blend of build-up 96 (weight 30%) + retention 76 (weight 30%) + progression 31 (weight 25%) + press resistance 34 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
build-up
Strong
passing directness, retention, carrying, transition
Average
—
Weak
press resistance, progression, box threat, ball-winning, crossing, receiving zones, defensive aggression, creativity, final-third threat, through-balls, territory (wide vs central), line-breaking, dribbling
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Build-up
96
Passing directness
78
Retention
76
Carrying
76
Transition ~proxy
75
Press resistance ~proxy
34
Progression
31
Box threat
29
Ball-winning
28
Crossing
24
Receiving zones
23
Defensive aggression
23
Creativity
21
Final-third threat
16
Through-balls ~proxy
14
Territory (wide vs central)
9
Line-breaking
7
Dribbling
4
09

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 188 cm / 78 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Carl Starfelt Celta Vigo · La Liga · 185 cm / 83 kg
91%
Driven by: build-up (19%), territory (wide vs central) (10%), line-breaking (9%). Different mechanism — Omobamidele more via carrying; Starfelt more via dribbling, press resistance.
Alexsandro Lille · 191 cm / 82 kg
89%
Driven by: build-up (19%), dribbling (16%), line-breaking (9%). Different mechanism — Omobamidele more via passing directness, transition.
Matteo Gabbia AC Milan · Serie A · 185 cm / 78 kg
84%
Driven by: dribbling (12%), build-up (12%), defensive aggression (11%). Different mechanism — Omobamidele more via transition, carrying; Gabbia more via box threat.
Moritz Jenz Wolfsburg · Bundesliga 25/26 · 190 cm / 86 kg
82%
Driven by: dribbling (14%), build-up (10%), territory (wide vs central) (9%). Different mechanism — Omobamidele more via carrying, transition.
Chancel Mbemba Lille 25/26 · 182 cm / 81 kg
82%
Driven by: dribbling (16%), line-breaking (15%), build-up (10%). Different mechanism — Omobamidele more via build-up, passing directness; Mbemba more via final-third threat, box threat.
Fernando Calero Malaga · La Liga · 183 cm / 71 kg
81%
Driven by: build-up (13%), dribbling (12%), territory (wide vs central) (11%). Different mechanism — Omobamidele more via carrying, build-up; Calero more via box threat, creativity.
10

Summary

Andrew Omobamidele is a ball-playing centre-back: 97% pass completion, 0 line-breaking passes and 2.8 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 2 matches (194 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a ball-playing centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-playing centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report