العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026

Destiny Udogie

Tottenham
Overlapping full-back FB
pushes high (x=55) · 0.0 crosses/90
full-backoverlapping full-backprogressioncrossing
169
minutes
4 apps
86%
pass completion
91 passes
5
progressive passes
2.7/90
8
final-3rd entries
4.3/90
1
box entries
0.53/90
35
defensive actions
18.6/90
5
tackles + interceptions
100% tackle win
2
dribbles
0% won
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Destiny Udogie has played 4 matches (169 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Left Wing, Middle third — wide or inverted — mostly in the middle third (47% of his 91 passes)
86% completion · 91× in 4/4 matches
↓
PROGRESS
carry or combine up the flank
2.7 prog/90 · 5× in 4/4 matches
↓
DEFEND
1v1 and cover on his side
35 def actions · lost 6% deep · 35× in 4/4 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress → Defend — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: dribble — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn); deliver — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

04

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

30 tracked carries (16.0/90, 8 progressive, 276m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

7%17%23%30%17%7%
progressivelateral/short% of his 30 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 26m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
4Outside → Inside
7Inside → Inside
18Outside → Outside
1Inside → Outside
First (18)Second (12)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

2
tackle duels
2
won
0
beaten · 0%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 0%
OUTSIDE 100%
Tackle-duel location — 0 inside · 2 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
0 · 0%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
2 · 100%
Vision AI beaten in 0 of 2 tackle duels (0% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 2 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

03

How does he create chances?

1 key passes (0.53/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
100%
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
05

Where does he become vulnerable?

15 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

6
attacking third (cheap)
8
middle third
1
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 40% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.16 danger-index/90 · 0.271 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays inside from the left wing toward the left hs in the final third — 1 passes worth 0.27 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the left hs toward the central in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the middle third: 17% of his 36 touches there are lost (6 times).
—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—7 touches · too few0%0/10 lost—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—5 touches · too few17%6/36 lost—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—7 touches · too few17%4/24 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

06

How & where does he defend?

35 defensive actions across the season (18.6/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
2
tackles · 100% won
3
interceptions · 1.6/90
7
recoveries · 3.7/90
6
clearances · 3.2/90
3
blocks
38
avg action height
6
won high (att 3rd)
14
middle third
15
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 12 proactive ball-wins (6.4/90), tackle success 100%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

07

Impact on the Team

Tottenham's output per match with Destiny Udogie (4 matches) versus without him (4 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 4 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (4)
WITHOUT (4)
Δ
goals against /match
1.50
1.00
+0.50
points /match
0.50
1.75
-1.25
goals for /match
0.25
1.75
-1.50
xG for /match
1.02
0.35
+0.67
08

His Share of the Team

Of everything Tottenham produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Destiny Udogie specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
tackles
4%
33 / 856
ball recoveries
4%
77 / 2125
progressive passes
3%
87 / 2489
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

09

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 233 full-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Overlapping full-back58%Inverted full-back52%
Why Overlapping full-back 58%: a weighted blend of transition 77 (weight 25%) + crossing 59 (weight 30%) + final-third threat 52 (weight 25%) + dribbling 23 (weight 20%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
transition, carrying, receiving zones
Average
defensive aggression, creativity, territory (wide vs central), retention, passing directness, crossing, ball-winning, build-up, final-third threat, through-balls, progression, press resistance
Weak
line-breaking, box threat, dribbling
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Transition ~proxy
77
Carrying
74
Receiving zones
72
Defensive aggression
64
Creativity
63
Territory (wide vs central)
62
Retention
61
Passing directness
60
Crossing
59
Ball-winning
58
Build-up
53
Final-third threat
52
Through-balls ~proxy
51
Progression
48
Press resistance ~proxy
41
Line-breaking
32
Box threat
31
Dribbling
23
10

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 186 cm / 73 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Lucas Hernández PSG · Ligue 1 · 184 cm / 79 kg
48%
Driven by: dribbling (22%), transition (19%), receiving zones (12%). Different mechanism — Udogie more via territory (wide vs central), through-balls; Hernández more via build-up, passing directness.
Pierre Kalulu Juventus · Serie A · 179 cm / 69 kg
46%
Driven by: transition (22%), dribbling (19%), receiving zones (17%). Different mechanism — Udogie more via territory (wide vs central); Kalulu more via line-breaking, final-third threat.
Ángel Ortiz Real Betis · La Liga · 167 cm / 60 kg
46%
Driven by: transition (29%), box threat (21%), carrying (12%). Different mechanism — Udogie more via receiving zones; Ortiz more via dribbling, line-breaking.
José Ángel Carmona Sevilla · La Liga · 184 cm / 80 kg
45%
Driven by: transition (29%), defensive aggression (12%), receiving zones (10%). Different mechanism — Udogie more via territory (wide vs central), retention; Carmona more via box threat, passing directness.
Kieran Trippier Newcastle 25/26 · 178 cm / 71 kg
43%
Driven by: dribbling (16%), receiving zones (16%), transition (15%). Different mechanism — Udogie more via ball-winning, retention; Trippier more via line-breaking, through-balls.
Mathías Olivera Napoli · Serie A · 174 cm / 78 kg
42%
Driven by: transition (26%), defensive aggression (15%), receiving zones (13%). Different mechanism — Udogie more via territory (wide vs central), through-balls; Olivera more via box threat, build-up.
11

Summary

Destiny Udogie is an overlapping full-back: 2.7 progressive passes and 1 box entries, delivering 1 key passes. Overlap-first full-back. [1v1 recovery pace and off-ball overlap timing need tracking.]

Based on 4 matches (169 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as an overlapping full-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is dribbling — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall overlapping full-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report