العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportLigue 1 2026

Rasmus Nicolaisen

Toulouse
Stopper centre-back CB
18.7 defensive actions/90 · 4.5 progressive/90 — defends first
Capability Analysis
Aerial & Box Defending32%vs 43 centre-backs
"Can he win the individual defensive battle in his own box?"
Aerial duels won /900.00%
Aerial win rate: 0.0%
Clearances /905.0464%
Ball-Winning47%vs 43 centre-backs
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /901.4175%
Ball recoveries /903.1320%
Tackles /900.762%
Duels won /902.6291%
Breaking Pressure
only 43 pressured-passing actions across 1 high-press match -- not enough sample (needs 5+ matches and 12+ actions)
Progression28%vs 43 centre-backs
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /902.6839%
Line-breaking passes /900.3411%
Threat added by passing /900.81xT25%
Pass accuracy86.74%36%
Ball-Carrying25%vs 43 centre-backs
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /904.1727%
Carry distance /9091.66m23%
centre-backstopper centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
462
minutes
5 apps
270
passes
94% completed
94%
pass completion
270 passes
23
progressive passes
4.5/90
12
line-breaking passes
2.3/90
96
defensive actions
18.7/90
9
tackles + interceptions
0% tackle win
26
clearances
5.1/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (53% of his 270 passes)
94% completion · 270× in 5/5 matches
↓
CARRY OUT
step into midfield to commit a presser
2 carries · 4× in 2/5 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
4.5 prog/90 · 12× in 4/5 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 5× in 2/5 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
1.8/90 · 9× in 4/5 matches
Signature: receive in the first line → break the midfield line vertically → switch or progress. Press him early and shut the vertical lane to force the safe sideways ball.
16

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
54
passes / match
18.7
def actions / 90
40–76
pass range (matches)
26
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (40 at the low end, 76 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

07

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

58 tracked carries (11.3/90, 14 progressive, 478m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

2%2%10%14%12%7%9%19%21%5%
progressivelateral/short% of his 58 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 21m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
5Outside → Inside
45Inside → Inside
3Outside → Outside
5Inside → Outside
First (23)Second (17)Third (14)Fourth (4)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

2
tackle duels
0
won
2
beaten · 100%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 50%
OUTSIDE 50%
Tackle-duel location — 1 inside · 1 outside
Right Wing
1 · 50%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
0 · 0%
Left Half-Space
1 · 50%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 2 of 2 tackle duels (100% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 2 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

03

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

11%
vertical passes
22×
2%
switches
5×
24%
carries
50×
63%
short circulation
131×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW1100%1RHS757%414%129%2C612%134%2148%295%311%7LHS1592%39%1544%7020%3225%39LW2623%642%1135%9FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the left half-space in the middle third → central areas in the middle third — 5 progressive passes (36% of his progression) at 0.016 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 57% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 7% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 6% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 1 line-breaking passes and 9 final-third entries, 2.2 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
1%1%4%12%16%6%8%21%18%12%1%
completedincomplete270 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
270
passes
94%
completed
16
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 94% season completion rate.
04

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

23
progressive · 4.5/90
9
final-third entries · 1.8/90
0
box entries · 0.00/90
17
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

How does he create chances?

0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
09

Where does he become vulnerable?

17 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

0
attacking third (cheap)
11
middle third
6
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 0% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.60 danger-index/90 · 0.483 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
08

What is his passing profile?

270
passes attempted
41%
mostly forward
52%
mostly medium
Direction
Forward
110 · 41%
Sideways
108 · 40%
Backward
52 · 19%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
116 · 46%
Medium
132 · 52%
Long (>30m)
6 · 2%
10

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.240.190.190.180.150.12
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.24
Left Half-Space Def third → Central Mid third
3 passes
0.19
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Half-Space Mid third
2 passes
0.19
Left Half-Space Mid third → Right Wing Att third
1 passes
0.18
Left Half-Space Mid third → Central Mid third
2 passes
0.15
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Mid third
4 passes
0.12
Left Half-Space Def third → Right Half-Space Mid third
1 passes
05

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Rasmus Nicolaisen gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
32%
Primary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
29%
Secondary
Left Half-Space, Defensive third
14%
Third
Central, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
06

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Rasmus Nicolaisen actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
22574933310334416423
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%1%4%12%16%6%8%21%18%12%1%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

23Progressive
12Long ball
5Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
17Outside → Inside
173Inside → Inside
10Outside → Outside
54Inside → Outside
By direction
110Forward
52Backward
108Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays inside from the left hs toward the central, advancing it forward in the defensive third — 3 passes worth 0.24 xT.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 20% of his 15 touches there are lost (3 times).
—1 touch · too few—2 touches · too few4%1/26 lost3%2/79 lost20%3/15 lost—0 touches · too few—5 touches · too few8%3/39 lost7%6/86 lost7%1/14 lost—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—1 touch · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

96 defensive actions across the season (18.7/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
2
tackles · 0% won
7
interceptions · 1.4/90
19
recoveries · 3.7/90
26
clearances · 5.1/90
3
blocks
30
avg action height
8
won high (att 3rd)
31
middle third
57
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by clearing and blocking — a reactive, protect-the-box profile. 28 proactive ball-wins (5.5/90), tackle success 0%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

14

Impact on the Team

Toulouse's output per match with Rasmus Nicolaisen (5 matches) versus without him (3 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 3 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (5)
WITHOUT (3)
Δ
goals against /match
1.00
2.00
-1.00
points /match
1.00
1.67
-0.67
goals for /match
1.00
2.33
-1.33
xG for /match
1.50
0.00
+1.50
15

His Share of the Team

Of everything Toulouse produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Rasmus Nicolaisen specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
clearances
27%
179 / 667
interceptions
20%
50 / 250
threat added by passing (xT)
9%
28.8 / 322.6
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

17

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 515 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Stopper centre-back40%Ball-playing centre-back38%
Why Stopper centre-back 40%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 58 (weight 35%) + ball-winning 34 (weight 40%) + retention 46 (weight 15%) + transition 28 (weight 10%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
—
Average
territory (wide vs central), crossing, defensive aggression, press resistance, box threat, dribbling, retention, build-up
Weak
through-balls, ball-winning, progression, carrying, final-third threat, transition, creativity, passing directness, line-breaking, receiving zones
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Territory (wide vs central)
67
Crossing
61
Defensive aggression
58
Press resistance ~proxy
52
Box threat
50
Dribbling
47
Retention
46
Build-up
42
Through-balls ~proxy
37
Ball-winning
34
Progression
31
Carrying
28
Final-third threat
28
Transition ~proxy
28
Creativity
27
Passing directness
26
Line-breaking
15
Receiving zones
15
18

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 191 cm / 81 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Ethan Pinnock Coventry · Premier League · 194 cm / 79 kg
84%
Driven by: transition (16%), carrying (12%), receiving zones (12%). Different mechanism — Nicolaisen more via retention, progression; Pinnock more via passing directness.
Sebastiaan Bornauw Hamburg · Bundesliga · 191 cm / 81 kg
82%
Driven by: transition (16%), receiving zones (16%), carrying (13%). Different mechanism — Nicolaisen more via defensive aggression, retention; Bornauw more via passing directness, through-balls.
Robin Hranác Hoffenheim · Bundesliga · 190 cm / 82 kg
81%
Driven by: transition (17%), carrying (14%), creativity (14%). Different mechanism — Nicolaisen more via crossing, ball-winning; Hranác more via receiving zones.
Arthur Chaves Augsburg · Bundesliga 25/26 · 188 cm / 80 kg
78%
Driven by: transition (17%), carrying (15%), final-third threat (13%). Different mechanism — Nicolaisen more via crossing, carrying; Chaves more via passing directness.
Abdoulaye Ndiaye Parma Calcio 1913 · Serie A · 185 cm / 75 kg
77%
Driven by: receiving zones (18%), line-breaking (14%), transition (14%). Different mechanism — Nicolaisen more via crossing, through-balls; Ndiaye more via dribbling.
Samir Chergui Paris FC · 185 cm / 78 kg
76%
Driven by: transition (19%), line-breaking (15%), carrying (12%). Different mechanism — Nicolaisen more via crossing, through-balls; Chergui more via box threat.
19

Summary

Rasmus Nicolaisen is a stopper centre-back: 94% pass completion, 12 line-breaking passes and 4.5 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 5 matches (462 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a stopper centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall stopper centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report