العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026

Aaron Hickey

Brentford
Stopper centre-back CB
20.2 defensive actions/90 · 3.2 progressive/90 — defends first
centre-backstopper centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
312
minutes
8 apps
135
passes
86% completed
86%
pass completion
135 passes
11
progressive passes
3.2/90
16
line-breaking passes
4.6/90
70
defensive actions
20.2/90
9
tackles + interceptions
50% tackle win
19
clearances
5.5/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Aaron Hickey has played 8 matches (312 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (46% of his 135 passes)
86% completion · 135× in 8/8 matches
↓
CARRY OUT
step into midfield to commit a presser
3 carries · 6× in 2/8 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
3.2 prog/90 · 16× in 7/8 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 5× in 4/8 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
2.9/90 · 10× in 7/8 matches
Signature: receive in the first line → break the midfield line vertically → switch or progress. Press him early and shut the vertical lane to force the safe sideways ball.
13

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
17
passes / match
20.2
def actions / 90
2–40
pass range (matches)
19
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (2 at the low end, 40 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

06

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

24 tracked carries (6.9/90, 7 progressive, 237m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

21%12%8%8%8%12%17%12%
progressivelateral/short% of his 24 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 29m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
2Outside → Inside
15Inside → Inside
6Outside → Outside
1Inside → Outside
First (13)Second (11)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

6
tackle duels
3
won
3
beaten · 50%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 67%
OUTSIDE 33%
Tackle-duel location — 4 inside · 2 outside
Right Wing
2 · 33%
Right Half-Space
1 · 17%
Central
3 · 50%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 3 of 6 tackle duels (50% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 3 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

08

How does he create chances?

0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
03

Where does he become vulnerable?

19 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

5
attacking third (cheap)
8
middle third
6
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 26% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.14 danger-index/90 · 0.391 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
04

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Aaron Hickey gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
17%
Primary
Right Wing, Middle third
12%
Secondary
Central, Middle third
9%
Third
Left Half-Space, Defensive third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
05

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Aaron Hickey actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
3121153311145101141017147
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%10%7%13%10%4%2%7%10%4%6%2%9%8%4%2%
own goal left, attacking →
07

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

1Cross
11Progressive
16Long ball
5Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
14Outside → Inside
52Inside → Inside
28Outside → Outside
22Inside → Outside
By direction
58Forward
31Backward
46Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays inside from the right wing toward the left hs in the final third — 1 passes worth 0.31 xT.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the middle third: 26% of his 23 touches there are lost (6 times).
18%2/11 lost—4 touches · too few10%1/10 lost0%0/13 lost—5 touches · too few26%6/23 lost—5 touches · too few6%1/17 lost8%1/13 lost—4 touches · too few18%2/11 lost10%1/10 lost—4 touches · too few—5 touches · too few—0 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

09

How & where does he defend?

70 defensive actions across the season (20.2/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
6
tackles · 50% won
3
interceptions · 0.9/90
14
recoveries · 4.0/90
19
clearances · 5.5/90
2
blocks
28
avg action height
4
won high (att 3rd)
20
middle third
46
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 23 proactive ball-wins (6.6/90), tackle success 50%. He defends deep, protecting his box — a last-line stopper.
10

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Aaron Hickey still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 3.0, 2m)
81%
4.5
6.7
0.90
Mid press (PPDA 3.8, 2m)
92%
3.3
3.3
0.78
Low press (PPDA 4.3, 4m)
88%
2.0
3.3
0.63
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

11

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Aaron Hickey played nearly every Brentford match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

12

His Share of the Team

Of everything Brentford produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Aaron Hickey specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
clearances
3%
44 / 1571
tackles
3%
21 / 833
interceptions
2%
11 / 499
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

14

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 515 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Stopper centre-back57%Ball-playing centre-back22%
Why Stopper centre-back 57%: a weighted blend of ball-winning 70 (weight 40%) + defensive aggression 55 (weight 35%) + retention 28 (weight 15%) + transition 31 (weight 10%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
territory (wide vs central)
Strong
crossing, through-balls, ball-winning
Average
receiving zones, line-breaking, defensive aggression, box threat, creativity, dribbling
Weak
progression, final-third threat, press resistance, transition, retention, build-up, carrying, passing directness
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Territory (wide vs central)
89
Crossing
80
Through-balls ~proxy
78
Ball-winning
70
Receiving zones
60
Line-breaking
59
Defensive aggression
55
Box threat
54
Creativity
52
Dribbling
45
Progression
37
Final-third threat
35
Press resistance ~proxy
35
Transition ~proxy
31
Retention
28
Build-up
22
Carrying
21
Passing directness
7
15

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 185 cm / 72 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Léo Pétrot Elche · La Liga 25/26 · 188 cm / 80 kg
89%
Driven by: passing directness (21%), territory (wide vs central) (14%), build-up (12%). Different mechanism — Pétrot more via progression.
John Donald Elche · La Liga 25/26 · 182 cm / 78 kg
87%
Driven by: build-up (17%), passing directness (16%), carrying (13%). Different mechanism — Hickey more via through-balls, line-breaking; Donald more via box threat.
Felix Agu Werder Bremen · Bundesliga 25/26 · 180 cm / 67 kg
86%
Driven by: build-up (16%), passing directness (15%), territory (wide vs central) (13%). Different mechanism — Hickey more via box threat; Agu more via creativity, dribbling.
Philipp Treu Freiburg · Bundesliga · 173 cm / 72 kg
85%
Driven by: build-up (17%), passing directness (16%), territory (wide vs central) (13%). Different mechanism — Hickey more via ball-winning; Treu more via dribbling.
James Justin Leeds · 183 cm / 80 kg
82%
Driven by: build-up (18%), territory (wide vs central) (12%), carrying (12%). Different mechanism — Hickey more via through-balls, receiving zones; Justin more via box threat.
Trai Hume Sunderland · 180 cm / 75 kg
81%
Driven by: build-up (19%), carrying (12%), retention (10%). Different mechanism — Hickey more via retention, dribbling; Hume more via line-breaking, box threat.
16

Summary

Aaron Hickey is a stopper centre-back: 86% pass completion, 16 line-breaking passes and 3.2 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 8 matches (312 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a stopper centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is retention — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall stopper centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report