His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
drop between the centre-backs — mostly in the middle third (65% of his 622 passes)
89% completion · 622× in 8/8 matches
↓
ESCAPE PRESSURE
turn out of a tight central area
73% won · 11× in 5/8 matches
↓
PROGRESS CENTRAL
break a line through the middle
4.2 prog/90 · 43× in 8/8 matches
↓
SCREEN / WIN BALL
protect the back four
9.1 ball-wins/90 · 65× in 8/8 matches
↓
RECYCLE / PROGRESS
keep it ticking, feed the final third
8.3 f3-entries/90 · 59× in 8/8 matches
Signature: drop to receive → escape the press on the turn → progress centrally or recycle → screen the counter. Block the central lane and press his first touch to force him backwards.
17
Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?
Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.
own goal left, attacking →
78
passes / match
19.5
def actions / 90
11–162
pass range (matches)
13
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (11 at the low end, 162 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
163 tracked carries (22.9/90, 33 progressive, 1514m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.
progressivelateral/short% of his 163 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 35m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
First (52)Second (39)Third (37)Fourth (35)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →
Beaten in the tackle
How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).
15
tackle duels
9
won
6
beaten · 40%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 67%
OUTSIDE 33%
Tackle-duel location — 10 inside · 5 outside
Right Wing
3 · 20%
Right Half-Space
6 · 40%
Central
2 · 13%
Left Half-Space
2 · 13%
Left Wing
2 · 13%
Vision AI beaten in 6 of 15 tackle duels (40% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →
Dribbles (1v1s)
Can he escape pressure on the ball? His carries/dribbles in tight central areas, by channel. Season rate: 1.54 dribbles attempted /90.
brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 82%
OUTSIDE 18%
Dribble location — 9 inside · 2 outside
Right Wing
2 · 18%
Right Half-Space
3 · 27%
Central
2 · 18%
Left Half-Space
4 · 36%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI 82% of his carries are central — he receives and turns in congested midfield zones rather than out wide.
02
How does he build & move the ball?
How does he escape the first line?
7%
vertical passes
20×
5%
switches
13×
36%
carries
96×
52%
short circulation
141×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.
How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.
own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.
Primary route: central areas in the middle third → central areas in the final third — 5 progressive passes (17% of his progression) at 0.080 xT each. He keeps it in the same lane.
His progression is inward: 55% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 10% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.
8% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.
Quality behind the volume: 9 line-breaking passes and 59 final-third entries, 4.9 total xT added.
Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter:fromto
completedincomplete622 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
622
passes
89%
completed
69
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete132 passes · any zone → Right Wing · own goal left, attacking →
132
passes
89%
completed
14
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete114 passes · any zone → Right Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
114
passes
92%
completed
9
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete193 passes · any zone → Central · own goal left, attacking →
193
passes
88%
completed
23
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete118 passes · any zone → Left Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
118
passes
86%
completed
16
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete65 passes · any zone → Left Wing · own goal left, attacking →
65
passes
89%
completed
7
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete92 passes · any zone → Defensive 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
92
passes
98%
completed
2
lost
Vision AI98% here vs 89% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete365 passes · any zone → Middle 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
365
passes
92%
completed
29
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete165 passes · any zone → Attacking 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
165
passes
77%
completed
38
lost
Vision AI77% here vs 89% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete75 passes · Right Wing → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
75
passes
88%
completed
9
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete43 passes · Right Wing → Right Wing · own goal left, attacking →
43
passes
91%
completed
4
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete21 passes · Right Wing → Right Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
21
passes
100%
completed
0
lost
Vision AI100% here vs 89% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete10 passes · Right Wing → Central · own goal left, attacking →
10
passes
60%
completed
4
lost
Vision AI60% here vs 89% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete1 passes · Right Wing → Left Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
1
passes
0%
completed
1
lost
completedincomplete0 passes · Right Wing → Left Wing · own goal left, attacking → — no passes matched this route
0
passes
0%
completed
0
lost
completedincomplete13 passes · Right Wing → Defensive 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
13
passes
100%
completed
0
lost
Vision AI100% here vs 89% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete39 passes · Right Wing → Middle 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
39
passes
90%
completed
4
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete23 passes · Right Wing → Attacking 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
23
passes
78%
completed
5
lost
Vision AI78% here vs 89% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete170 passes · Right Half-Space → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
170
passes
90%
completed
17
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete53 passes · Right Half-Space → Right Wing · own goal left, attacking →
53
passes
92%
completed
4
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete47 passes · Right Half-Space → Right Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
47
passes
87%
completed
6
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete56 passes · Right Half-Space → Central · own goal left, attacking →
56
passes
93%
completed
4
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete12 passes · Right Half-Space → Left Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
12
passes
75%
completed
3
lost
Vision AI75% here vs 89% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete2 passes · Right Half-Space → Left Wing · own goal left, attacking →
2
passes
100%
completed
0
lost
completedincomplete25 passes · Right Half-Space → Defensive 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
25
passes
96%
completed
1
lost
Vision AI96% here vs 89% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete98 passes · Right Half-Space → Middle 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
98
passes
93%
completed
7
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete47 passes · Right Half-Space → Attacking 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
47
passes
81%
completed
9
lost
Vision AI81% here vs 89% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete196 passes · Central → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
196
passes
93%
completed
13
lost
Vision AI93% here vs 89% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete30 passes · Central → Right Wing · own goal left, attacking →
30
passes
90%
completed
3
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete38 passes · Central → Right Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
38
passes
95%
completed
2
lost
Vision AI95% here vs 89% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete67 passes · Central → Central · own goal left, attacking →
67
passes
94%
completed
4
lost
Vision AI94% here vs 89% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete49 passes · Central → Left Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
49
passes
96%
completed
2
lost
Vision AI96% here vs 89% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete12 passes · Central → Left Wing · own goal left, attacking →
12
passes
83%
completed
2
lost
Vision AI83% here vs 89% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete24 passes · Central → Defensive 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
24
passes
100%
completed
0
lost
Vision AI100% here vs 89% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete126 passes · Central → Middle 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
126
passes
95%
completed
6
lost
Vision AI95% here vs 89% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete46 passes · Central → Attacking 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
46
passes
85%
completed
7
lost
Vision AI85% here vs 89% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete135 passes · Left Half-Space → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
135
passes
84%
completed
21
lost
Vision AI84% here vs 89% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete5 passes · Left Half-Space → Right Wing · own goal left, attacking →
5
passes
40%
completed
3
lost
completedincomplete8 passes · Left Half-Space → Right Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
8
passes
88%
completed
1
lost
completedincomplete48 passes · Left Half-Space → Central · own goal left, attacking →
48
passes
88%
completed
6
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete38 passes · Left Half-Space → Left Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
38
passes
79%
completed
8
lost
Vision AI79% here vs 89% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete36 passes · Left Half-Space → Left Wing · own goal left, attacking →
36
passes
92%
completed
3
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete20 passes · Left Half-Space → Defensive 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
20
passes
95%
completed
1
lost
Vision AI95% here vs 89% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete79 passes · Left Half-Space → Middle 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
79
passes
89%
completed
9
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete36 passes · Left Half-Space → Attacking 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
36
passes
69%
completed
11
lost
Vision AI69% here vs 89% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete46 passes · Left Wing → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
46
passes
80%
completed
9
lost
Vision AI80% here vs 89% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete1 passes · Left Wing → Right Wing · own goal left, attacking →
1
passes
100%
completed
0
lost
completedincomplete0 passes · Left Wing → Right Half-Space · own goal left, attacking → — no passes matched this route
0
passes
0%
completed
0
lost
completedincomplete12 passes · Left Wing → Central · own goal left, attacking →
12
passes
58%
completed
5
lost
Vision AI58% here vs 89% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete18 passes · Left Wing → Left Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
18
passes
89%
completed
2
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete15 passes · Left Wing → Left Wing · own goal left, attacking →
15
passes
87%
completed
2
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete10 passes · Left Wing → Defensive 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
10
passes
100%
completed
0
lost
Vision AI100% here vs 89% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete23 passes · Left Wing → Middle 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
23
passes
87%
completed
3
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete13 passes · Left Wing → Attacking 3rd · own goal left, attacking →
13
passes
54%
completed
6
lost
Vision AI54% here vs 89% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete111 passes · Defensive 3rd → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
111
passes
86%
completed
16
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete28 passes · Defensive 3rd → Right Wing · own goal left, attacking →
28
passes
79%
completed
6
lost
Vision AI79% here vs 89% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete19 passes · Defensive 3rd → Right Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
19
passes
89%
completed
2
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
completedincomplete31 passes · Defensive 3rd → Central · own goal left, attacking →
31
passes
94%
completed
2
lost
Vision AI94% here vs 89% for the season — a safer zone for him.
completedincomplete23 passes · Defensive 3rd → Left Half-Space · own goal left, attacking →
23
passes
83%
completed
4
lost
Vision AI83% here vs 89% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
completedincomplete10 passes · Defensive 3rd → Left Wing · own goal left, attacking →
10
passes
80%
completed
2
lost
Vision AI80% here vs 89% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
Vision AI75% here vs 89% for the season — a riskier zone for him.
04
How does he progress play?
How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.
30
progressive · 4.2/90
59
final-third entries · 8.3/90
7
box entries · 0.98/90
28
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12
How does he create chances?
8 key passes (1.12/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (7)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
06
Where does he become vulnerable?
72 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.
23
attacking third (cheap)
33
middle third
16
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 32% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 3.18 danger-index/90 · 0.314 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
05
What is his passing profile?
622
passes attempted
42%
mostly sideways
59%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
234 · 38%
Sideways
262 · 42%
Backward
126 · 20%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
326 · 59%
Medium
200 · 36%
Long (>30m)
27 · 5%
07
Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted
His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.37
Central Mid third → Right Wing Att third
4 passes
0.32
Right Wing Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.26
Central Mid third → Left Wing Att third
2 passes · 1 to a shot
0.25
Left Half-Space Att third → Central Att third
1 passes · 1 to a shot
0.22
Left Half-Space Mid third → Right Wing Att third
2 passes
0.16
Left Half-Space Def third → Left Wing Att third
1 passes
09
Where Does He Receive?
The zones where Elliot Anderson gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
23%
Primary
Central, Middle third
16%
Secondary
Right Half-Space, Middle third
14%
Third
Left Half-Space, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
10
Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone
Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Elliot Anderson actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.
Filter:
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches
Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone
Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.
own goal left, attacking →
08
Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete
Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches it out from the central to the right wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 4 passes worth 0.37 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 8 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the left hs toward the central in the final third — 2 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the final third: 43% of his 14 touches there are lost (6 times).
139 defensive actions across the season (19.5/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
15
tackles · 60% won
10
interceptions · 1.4/90
40
recoveries · 5.6/90
13
clearances · 1.8/90
5
blocks
40
avg action height
15
won high (att 3rd)
73
middle third
51
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 65 proactive ball-wins (9.1/90), tackle success 60%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
14
Can he play under pressure?
Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Elliot Anderson still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.
press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 4.5, 2m)
82%
1.9
4.7
0.66
Mid press (PPDA 5.5, 2m)
92%
3.9
4.8
1.43
Low press (PPDA 8.0, 4m)
90%
6.1
7.8
2.45
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Insufficient sample: Elliot Anderson played nearly every Man City match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.
16
His Share of the Team
Of everything Man City produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Elliot Anderson specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
expected assists (xA)
13%
5.9 / 44.8
ball recoveries
12%
346 / 2785
tackles
12%
119 / 958
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 258 defensive mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Final-third threat
96
Progression
96
Line-breaking
95
Carrying
94
Transition ~proxy
90
Through-balls ~proxy
89
Dribbling
88
Creativity
85
Receiving zones
82
Passing directness
81
Crossing
78
Box threat
74
Territory (wide vs central)
74
Press resistance ~proxy
71
Ball-winning
70
Defensive aggression
70
Build-up
63
Retention
55
19
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 179 cm / 69 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Cristian Cásseres Toulouse · Ligue 1 · 176 cm / 68 kg
89%
Driven by: transition (14%), creativity (13%), final-third threat (13%). Different mechanism — Anderson more via dribbling, territory (wide vs central).
Manuel Locatelli Juventus · Serie A · 185 cm / 75 kg
87%
Driven by: transition (14%), progression (10%), final-third threat (10%). Different mechanism — Anderson more via territory (wide vs central), dribbling; Locatelli more via retention, passing directness.
Arthur Avom Lorient · Ligue 1 · 173 cm / 64 kg
85%
Driven by: transition (13%), final-third threat (12%), carrying (12%). Different mechanism — Anderson more via defensive aggression, dribbling.
Bryan Cristante Roma · Serie A · 186 cm / 80 kg
84%
Driven by: transition (20%), progression (12%), final-third threat (12%). Different mechanism — Anderson more via dribbling, creativity.
Manu Morlanes Mallorca · La Liga 25/26 · 178 cm / 75 kg
84%
Driven by: final-third threat (13%), progression (11%), crossing (10%). Different mechanism — Anderson more via carrying, passing directness.
Dani Ceballos Real Betis · La Liga · 179 cm / 70 kg
83%
Driven by: transition (15%), final-third threat (12%), progression (10%). Different mechanism — Anderson more via box threat, dribbling; Ceballos more via retention, ball-winning.
20
Summary
Elliot Anderson is a ball-winning 6 / deep-lying playmaker: 89% completion, 43 line-breaks and 4.2 progressive passes /90, resisting pressure with 73% dribble success. A central controller. [Off-ball screening position and scanning need tracking data.]
Based on 8 matches (641 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a ball-winning 6 / deep-lying playmaker — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is retention — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-winning 6 profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.