Thin sample this season. Martin Vitík has played 1 match (9 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (100% of his 2 passes)
100% completion · 2× in 1/1 matches
Signature: Only Receive shows a proven, repeatable pattern this season — too little evidence yet (1 match loaded) for a fuller signature chain.
Not a pattern: carry out — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); break a line — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); switch play — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); progress — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Bologna's output per match with Martin Vitík (1 matches) versus without him (7 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 7 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (1)
WITHOUT (7)
Δ
goals against /match
0.00
1.43
-1.43
points /match
3.00
0.71
+2.29
goals for /match
2.00
0.86
+1.14
xG for /match
1.33
1.32
+0.02
03
His Share of the Team
Of everything Bologna produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Martin Vitík specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
clearances
9%
97 / 1082
tackles
6%
37 / 641
final-third entries
3%
56 / 1769
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 513 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Stopper centre-back57%Ball-playing centre-back54%
Why Stopper centre-back 57%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 76 (weight 35%) + ball-winning 41 (weight 40%) + retention 59 (weight 15%) + transition 30 (weight 10%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Defensive aggression
76
Territory (wide vs central)
66
Press resistance ~proxy
64
Dribbling
63
Retention
59
Build-up
57
Carrying
55
Box threat
46
Ball-winning
41
Final-third threat
39
Progression
34
Transition ~proxy
30
Line-breaking
29
Passing directness
26
Receiving zones
22
Crossing
19
Creativity
16
Through-balls ~proxy
10
05
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 193 cm / 84 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Abdoulaye Ndiaye Parma Calcio 1913 · 185 cm / 75 kg
82%
Driven by: creativity (17%), crossing (13%), receiving zones (12%). Different mechanism — Vitík more via final-third threat, line-breaking; Ndiaye more via box threat.
Stephan Zagadou Le Havre · Ligue 1 25/26 · 186 cm
80%
Driven by: creativity (16%), receiving zones (13%), crossing (13%). Different mechanism — Vitík more via box threat, final-third threat.
Timo Hübers Koln · Bundesliga 25/26 · 190 cm / 82 kg
76%
Driven by: creativity (21%), through-balls (14%), receiving zones (11%). Different mechanism — Vitík more via box threat, carrying.
Luka Lochoshvili Koln · Bundesliga · 191 cm / 84 kg
74%
Driven by: creativity (16%), receiving zones (13%), through-balls (12%). Different mechanism — Vitík more via territory (wide vs central), line-breaking; Lochoshvili more via build-up, passing directness.
Natan Real Betis · La Liga · 188 cm / 92 kg
72%
Driven by: creativity (22%), crossing (15%), receiving zones (14%). Different mechanism — Vitík more via defensive aggression, line-breaking; Natan more via passing directness.
Nobel Mendy Hull City · Premier League · 187 cm / 78 kg
72%
Driven by: creativity (23%), crossing (14%), through-balls (13%). Different mechanism — Vitík more via defensive aggression, carrying.
06
Summary
Martin Vitík is a stopper centre-back: 100% pass completion, 0 line-breaking passes and 10.0 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]
Based on 1 matches (9 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a stopper centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall stopper centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
← BACK TO SEARCH
