Thin sample this season. Isak Jansson has played 5 matches (75 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Left Wing, Middle third — between the lines — mostly in the attacking third (57% of his 14 passes)
57% completion · 14× in 4/4 matches
Signature: Only Receive shows a proven, repeatable pattern this season — too little evidence yet (4 matches loaded) for a fuller signature chain.
Not a pattern: turn / beat man — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); create — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); finish — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Nice's output per match with Isak Jansson (5 matches) versus without him (3 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 3 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (5)
WITHOUT (3)
Δ
goals for /match
1.00
1.00
+0.00
xG for /match
0.89
0.88
+0.01
goals against /match
1.60
0.67
+0.93
points /match
1.20
1.67
-0.47
03
His Share of the Team
Of everything Nice produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Isak Jansson specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
zone-14 entries
5%
11 / 242
shots
4%
19 / 475
expected goals (xG)
3%
1.5 / 49.6
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 247 attacking mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Half-space creator30%Advanced playmaker (8)30%
Why Half-space creator 30%: a weighted blend of creativity 48 (weight 40%) + box threat 44 (weight 15%) + final-third threat 21 (weight 30%) + dribbling 13 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Passing directness
98
Defensive aggression
81
Territory (wide vs central)
72
Crossing
65
Ball-winning
62
Transition ~proxy
55
Creativity
48
Receiving zones
44
Box threat
44
Carrying
30
Final-third threat
21
Progression
21
Press resistance ~proxy
14
Line-breaking
14
Dribbling
13
Through-balls ~proxy
12
Retention
11
Build-up
10
05
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 174 cm) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Kevin Schade Brentford · Premier League · 183 cm / 74 kg
80%
Driven by: press resistance (14%), retention (12%), passing directness (10%). Different mechanism — Jansson more via crossing, receiving zones; Schade more via build-up, box threat.
Mattéo Tramoni Pisa · Serie A 25/26 · 175 cm / 72 kg
75%
Driven by: build-up (17%), press resistance (17%), passing directness (15%). Different mechanism — Jansson more via carrying, receiving zones; Tramoni more via through-balls, line-breaking.
Omri Gandelman Lecce · Serie A · 188 cm / 84 kg
73%
Driven by: press resistance (14%), dribbling (10%), defensive aggression (10%). Different mechanism — Jansson more via box threat, ball-winning.
Vítinha Genoa · Serie A · 178 cm / 74 kg
72%
Driven by: build-up (17%), retention (14%), press resistance (9%). Different mechanism — Jansson more via crossing, receiving zones; Vítinha more via dribbling, box threat.
Dango Ouattara Brentford · Premier League · 177 cm / 71 kg
72%
Driven by: build-up (19%), retention (18%), press resistance (16%). Different mechanism — Jansson more via defensive aggression, receiving zones; Ouattara more via through-balls, box threat.
Federico Chiesa Liverpool · Premier League · 175 cm / 70 kg
72%
Driven by: press resistance (16%), build-up (16%), dribbling (13%). Different mechanism — Jansson more via crossing, defensive aggression; Chiesa more via box threat.
06
Summary
Isak Jansson is a half-space creator: 0.00 key passes /90, 0.0 progressive passes, 0 goals from 0.11 xG. A between-the-lines creator. [Off-ball movement into pockets needs tracking.]
Based on 5 matches (75 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a half-space creator — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is dribbling — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall half-space creator profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
← BACK TO SEARCH
