Thin sample this season. Lamare Bogarde has played 1 match (22 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Left Wing, Attacking third — mostly in the attacking third (100% of his 2 passes)
100% completion · 2× in 1/1 matches
Signature: Only Receive shows a proven, repeatable pattern this season — too little evidence yet (1 match loaded) for a fuller signature chain.
Not a pattern: progress — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); arrive — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); create / finish — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Aston Villa's output per match with Lamare Bogarde (1 matches) versus without him (7 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 7 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (1)
WITHOUT (7)
Δ
goals for /match
0.00
1.29
-1.29
xG for /match
0.32
1.14
-0.82
goals against /match
4.00
1.14
+2.86
points /match
0.00
1.57
-1.57
03
His Share of the Team
Of everything Aston Villa produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Lamare Bogarde specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
tackles
4%
26 / 731
ball recoveries
3%
43 / 1676
clearances
2%
25 / 1034
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 383 central mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Tempo controller63%Deep-lying playmaker56%Box-to-box runner20%Transition runner16%
Why Tempo controller 63%: a weighted blend of retention 72 (weight 35%) + build-up 81 (weight 30%) + press resistance 35 (weight 20%) + progression 30 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Build-up
81
Retention
72
Territory (wide vs central)
55
Passing directness
52
Crossing
38
Press resistance ~proxy
35
Transition ~proxy
33
Receiving zones
33
Ball-winning
32
Line-breaking
32
Progression
30
Carrying
29
Defensive aggression
23
Creativity
21
Final-third threat
17
Through-balls ~proxy
11
Dribbling
5
Box threat
2
05
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 185 cm / 75 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Marc Aguado Elche · La Liga · 178 cm / 68 kg
90%
Driven by: box threat (17%), dribbling (16%), build-up (9%). Different mechanism — Bogarde more via territory (wide vs central); Aguado more via ball-winning.
Salis Abdul Samed Nice · Ligue 1 25/26 · 179 cm / 69 kg
90%
Driven by: box threat (15%), dribbling (11%), defensive aggression (10%). Different mechanism — Bogarde more via territory (wide vs central), passing directness.
Malthe Højholt Pisa · Serie A 25/26 · 182 cm / 65 kg
84%
Driven by: dribbling (13%), box threat (12%), creativity (12%). Different mechanism — Bogarde more via line-breaking, territory (wide vs central).
Aster Vranckx Sassuolo · Serie A 25/26 · 183 cm / 78 kg
81%
Driven by: box threat (17%), final-third threat (11%), dribbling (11%). Different mechanism — Bogarde more via passing directness, territory (wide vs central); Vranckx more via defensive aggression.
Patrick Osterhage Freiburg · Bundesliga · 187 cm / 80 kg
80%
Driven by: creativity (15%), final-third threat (11%), through-balls (10%). Different mechanism — Bogarde more via line-breaking, territory (wide vs central); Osterhage more via dribbling, box threat.
Michel Adopo Cagliari · Serie A · 187 cm / 76 kg
74%
Driven by: through-balls (15%), final-third threat (14%), dribbling (13%). Different mechanism — Bogarde more via build-up, retention; Adopo more via box threat, ball-winning.
06
Summary
Lamare Bogarde is a tempo controller / deep-lying playmaker: 0.0 progressive passes, 0.00 key passes /90, 0 box entries, 0 goals from 0.00 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.
Based on 1 matches (22 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a tempo controller / deep-lying playmaker — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall tempo controller profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
← BACK TO SEARCH
