Thin sample this season. Quinten Timber has played 1 match (45 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Left Wing, Attacking third — mostly in the attacking third (69% of his 16 passes)
62% completion · 16× in 1/1 matches
Signature: Only Receive shows a proven, repeatable pattern this season — too little evidence yet (1 match loaded) for a fuller signature chain.
Not a pattern: progress — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); arrive — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); create / finish — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Crystal Palace's output per match with Quinten Timber (1 matches) versus without him (7 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 7 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (1)
WITHOUT (7)
Δ
goals for /match
0.00
2.57
-2.57
xG for /match
1.39
0.00
+1.39
goals against /match
2.00
1.57
+0.43
points /match
0.00
1.71
-1.71
03
His Share of the Team
Of everything Crystal Palace produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Quinten Timber specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
13%
22 / 168
tackles
11%
44 / 405
zone-14 entries
8%
16 / 207
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 382 central mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Why Transition runner 64%: a weighted blend of transition 59 (weight 45%) + defensive aggression 74 (weight 30%) + box threat 43 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Dribbling
80
Defensive aggression
74
Receiving zones
74
Passing directness
70
Carrying
65
Press resistance ~proxy
64
Transition ~proxy
59
Creativity
58
Ball-winning
56
Retention
55
Box threat
43
Final-third threat
42
Territory (wide vs central)
42
Crossing
42
Build-up
40
Progression
31
Line-breaking
17
Through-balls ~proxy
14
05
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 179 cm / 74 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Nelson Deossa Real Betis · La Liga · 185 cm / 71 kg
75%
Driven by: dribbling (20%), through-balls (18%), line-breaking (14%). Different mechanism — Timber more via passing directness, final-third threat; Deossa more via box threat, press resistance.
Adrian Beck Heidenheim · Bundesliga 25/26 · 186 cm / 75 kg
72%
Driven by: dribbling (20%), through-balls (16%), defensive aggression (15%). Different mechanism — Timber more via passing directness; Beck more via retention, press resistance.
Joel Chima Fujita St. Pauli · Bundesliga 25/26 · 175 cm / 76 kg
72%
Driven by: dribbling (16%), defensive aggression (14%), through-balls (12%). Different mechanism — Timber more via crossing, carrying; Fujita more via ball-winning, line-breaking.
Joelinton Newcastle · Premier League · 186 cm / 81 kg
71%
Driven by: through-balls (20%), dribbling (15%), line-breaking (13%). Different mechanism — Timber more via carrying, progression; Joelinton more via ball-winning.
Mohamed Kaba Lecce · Serie A · 185 cm / 71 kg
68%
Driven by: defensive aggression (23%), through-balls (14%), line-breaking (12%). Different mechanism — Timber more via receiving zones, carrying; Kaba more via passing directness, ball-winning.
Manu Koné Roma · Serie A · 185 cm / 80 kg
63%
Driven by: dribbling (19%), press resistance (15%), defensive aggression (13%). Different mechanism — Koné more via retention, build-up.
06
Summary
Quinten Timber is a transition runner: 0.0 progressive passes, 0.00 key passes /90, 0 box entries, 0 goals from 0.00 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.
Based on 1 matches (45 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a transition runner — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is box threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall transition runner profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
← BACK TO SEARCH
