العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026
IPS

Jaden Philogene

Ipswich
Balanced wide forward W
wing 61% · inside 39% — no dominant lane
left winger1v1 carriercuts insidehalf-space creator
189
minutes
4 apps
0
goals
0.25 xG
9
dribbles
33% won
0
key passes
0.00/90
0
box entries
0.00/90
0
progressive passes
0.0/90
5
final-3rd entries
2.4/90
76%
pass completion
59 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Left Wing, Attacking third — mostly in the attacking third (58% of his 59 passes)
33% of touches wide left · 59× in 4/4 matches
↓
CARRY / BEAT MAN
dribble past the full-back, cut inside
33% won · 9× in 3/4 matches
Signature: Receive → Carry / Beat Man — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: progress — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); create / finish — 4× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

03

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

22 tracked carries (10.5/90, 3 progressive, 241m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

5%5%5%5%9%23%45%5%
progressivelateral/short% of his 22 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 9m, longest 29m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
7Outside → Inside
7Inside → Inside
8Outside → Outside
First (22)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Jaden Philogene's signature is the dribble. Does he carry outside (down the left wing) or inside (into the half-space / centre)? Every dribble classified by channel. Season rate: 4.29 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 67%
OUTSIDE 33%
Dribble location — 6 inside · 3 outside
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
2 · 22%
Left Half-Space
4 · 44%
Left Wing
3 · 33%
Vision AI 33% of his dribbles are in the wide left lane — he attacks the full-back on the outside, then threatens to cut inside onto his right foot.
02

How does he create chances?

0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
05

Where does he become vulnerable?

20 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

19
attacking third (cheap)
0
middle third
1
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 95% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.09 danger-index/90 · 0.115 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
04

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left half-space in the final third: 56% of his 9 touches there are lost (5 times).
—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—6 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—5 touches · too few0%0/11 lost—2 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—5 touches · too few56%5/9 lost33%6/18 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

06

How & where does he defend?

24 defensive actions across the season (11.4/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
3
tackles · 33% won
1
interceptions · 0.5/90
6
recoveries · 2.9/90
0
clearances · 0.0/90
3
blocks
51
avg action height
8
won high (att 3rd)
10
middle third
6
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 10 proactive ball-wins (4.8/90), tackle success 33%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

13
attacking-half actions · 6.19/90
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

07

Impact on the Team

Ipswich's output per match with Jaden Philogene (4 matches) versus without him (4 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 4 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (4)
WITHOUT (4)
Δ
goals for /match
1.50
1.50
+0.00
xG for /match
1.12
0.36
+0.75
goals against /match
1.25
2.75
-1.50
points /match
1.75
0.75
+1.00
08

His Share of the Team

Of everything Ipswich produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Jaden Philogene specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
2%
3 / 149
half-space entries
1%
8 / 545
shots
1%
4 / 319
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

09

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 234 wingers in the pool (min 180 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Pressing forward63%Transition runner42%Half-space creator35%Inside forward33%
Why Pressing forward 63%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 77 (weight 45%) + ball-winning 50 (weight 30%) + transition 32 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
defensive aggression, territory (wide vs central)
Average
receiving zones, retention, ball-winning, build-up, press resistance, dribbling, carrying, passing directness, final-third threat, creativity
Weak
transition, box threat, progression, through-balls, line-breaking, crossing
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Defensive aggression
77
Territory (wide vs central)
72
Receiving zones
66
Retention
55
Ball-winning
50
Build-up
46
Press resistance ~proxy
46
Dribbling
44
Carrying
43
Passing directness
43
Final-third threat
41
Creativity
41
Transition ~proxy
32
Box threat
29
Progression
14
Through-balls ~proxy
8
Line-breaking
4
Crossing
3
10

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 181 cm / 66 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Joaquín Muñoz Malaga · La Liga · 173 cm / 60 kg
74%
Driven by: through-balls (17%), crossing (16%), transition (12%). Different mechanism — Philogene more via passing directness, receiving zones; Muñoz more via crossing.
Montrell Culbreath Leverkusen · Bundesliga 25/26 · 172 cm / 65 kg
68%
Driven by: crossing (29%), through-balls (16%), line-breaking (10%). Different mechanism — Philogene more via dribbling, passing directness; Culbreath more via ball-winning, line-breaking.
Jan Virgili Mallorca · La Liga 25/26 · 168 cm
67%
Driven by: crossing (20%), through-balls (19%), line-breaking (16%). Different mechanism — Philogene more via territory (wide vs central), receiving zones; Virgili more via dribbling, crossing.
Matteo Cancellieri Lazio · Serie A · 180 cm / 79 kg
67%
Driven by: crossing (24%), progression (16%), transition (15%). Different mechanism — Philogene more via carrying, final-third threat; Cancellieri more via line-breaking, through-balls.
Pontus Almqvist Parma Calcio 1913 · Serie A · 183 cm / 67 kg
66%
Driven by: line-breaking (17%), progression (17%), through-balls (12%). Different mechanism — Philogene more via receiving zones, dribbling; Almqvist more via crossing, ball-winning.
Williot Swedberg Celta Vigo · La Liga · 187 cm / 78 kg
64%
Driven by: crossing (19%), progression (17%), line-breaking (15%). Different mechanism — Philogene more via territory (wide vs central), final-third threat.
11

Summary

Jaden Philogene is a wide, outside-first left carrier: 33% of dribbles in the wing lane, 63% of passes from wide — but 58% land inside. 0.0 progressive passes and 0.00 key passes /90 plus 0 goals from 0.25 xG. A carry-and-deliver threat.

Based on 4 matches (189 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a pressing forward — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall pressing forward profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report