Thin sample this season. Issa Soumaré has played 6 matches (372 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
Signature: Link → Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: receive / move — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); convert — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
32 tracked carries (7.7/90, 9 progressive, 331m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.
progressivelateral/short% of his 32 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 36m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
First (19)Second (13)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →
Dribbles (1v1s)
Only 6 dribbles attempted this season — too little volume to map a location pattern.
03
How does he create chances?
2 key passes (0.48/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (2)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (2)from the right (0)of 2 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
06
Where does he become vulnerable?
34 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.
18
attacking third (cheap)
15
middle third
1
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 53% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.62 danger-index/90 · 0.197 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
07
Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone
Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Issa Soumaré actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.
Filter:
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches
Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone
Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.
own goal left, attacking →
02
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the left wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 2 passes worth 0.27 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 2 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the central in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left half-space in the final third: 44% of his 16 touches there are lost (7 times).
05
Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch
Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.
own goal left, attacking →
Across 32 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he drives along the touchline (50%). He carries from outside into the middle 9 times and out toward the touchline 3 — a genuine inside forward who cuts in with the ball.
04
What happens right after he carries the ball
Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.
Shot
1 · 3%
Progressive / key pass
7 · 22%
Simple pass
15 · 47%
No clean link
9 · 28%
Of 32 carries, 3% flow straight into a shot of his own, 22% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 28% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
65 defensive actions across the season (15.7/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
3
tackles · 33% won
4
interceptions · 1.0/90
9
recoveries · 2.2/90
9
clearances · 2.2/90
9
blocks
49
avg action height
22
won high (att 3rd)
18
middle third
25
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by clearing and blocking — a reactive, protect-the-box profile. 16 proactive ball-wins (3.9/90), tackle success 33%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
Defensive work in the attacking half
Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.
33
attacking-half actions · 7.98/90
09
Against Different Pressing Intensities
Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Issa Soumaré keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-2 matches — directional evidence, not proof.
press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 4.2, 2m)
0.39
1.4
0.68
100%
Mid press (PPDA 5.1, 2m)
0.27
0.7
0.66
50%
Low press (PPDA 6.1, 2m)
0.73
0.9
0.00
33%
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Rennes's output per match with Issa Soumaré (6 matches) versus without him (2 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 2 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (6)
WITHOUT (2)
Δ
goals for /match
2.50
1.50
+1.00
xG for /match
2.00
0.67
+1.33
goals against /match
1.67
2.00
-0.33
points /match
2.17
1.50
+0.67
12
His Share of the Team
Of everything Rennes produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Issa Soumaré specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
expected goals (xG)
17%
12.8 / 74.8
shots
12%
87 / 700
successful take-ons
10%
29 / 297
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 299 strikers in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Why Pressing forward 72%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 52 (weight 45%) + ball-winning 77 (weight 30%) + transition 79 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Territory (wide vs central)
93
Passing directness
86
Progression
82
Transition ~proxy
79
Line-breaking
79
Through-balls ~proxy
79
Ball-winning
77
Carrying
77
Final-third threat
70
Dribbling
62
Crossing
60
Box threat
54
Defensive aggression
52
Creativity
52
Receiving zones
46
Press resistance ~proxy
43
Build-up
36
Retention
25
14
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 182 cm / 78 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Patrick Cutrone Monza · Serie A · 183 cm / 75 kg
89%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (18%), transition (15%), retention (11%). Different mechanism — Soumaré more via final-third threat.
Herba Guirassy Nantes 25/26 · 177 cm / 66 kg
86%
Driven by: transition (16%), territory (wide vs central) (12%), ball-winning (12%). Different mechanism — Soumaré more via box threat; Guirassy more via build-up.
Matthis Abline Monaco · 176 cm / 67 kg
86%
Driven by: transition (14%), territory (wide vs central) (11%), passing directness (11%). Different mechanism — Soumaré more via build-up; Abline more via dribbling, final-third threat.
Nicolò Zaniolo Udinese · Serie A · 190 cm / 79 kg
84%
Driven by: transition (16%), progression (11%), ball-winning (10%). Different mechanism — Zaniolo more via receiving zones, creativity.
Rayan Philippe Paderborn · Bundesliga · 182 cm / 78 kg
84%
Driven by: transition (19%), ball-winning (14%), territory (wide vs central) (12%). Different mechanism — Soumaré more via line-breaking, receiving zones.
Martín Satriano Getafe · La Liga · 187 cm / 75 kg
83%
Driven by: territory (wide vs central) (14%), transition (14%), ball-winning (13%). Different mechanism — Soumaré more via box threat; Satriano more via defensive aggression.
15
Summary
Issa Soumaré is a pressing forward / transition runner: 0 goals from 0.77 xG (-0.77 vs expected), 10 shots, 0 box entries. Under-performing his chances. [Off-ball runs, aerials and hold-up under contact need tracking/aerial data.]
Based on 6 matches (372 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a pressing forward / transition runner — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is defensive aggression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall pressing forward profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.