Limited sample. This report is built from 77 tracked passes, so 2 sections stay hidden until there is enough data to read them honestly: How does he build & move the ball?; Can he finish?. Why each was hidden →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Left Half-Space, Middle third — mostly in the middle third (69% of his 77 passes)
92% completion · 77× in 5/5 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive or pass into the final third
3.3 prog/90 · 6× in 3/5 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
0.56 key passes /90 · 0 goals · 7× in 1/5 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress → Create / Finish — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: arrive — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
15
Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?
Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.
own goal left, attacking →
15
passes / match
1.0
dribbles / match
2–34
pass range (matches)
1–1
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (2 at the low end, 34 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.
Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Mamady Diambou actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.
Filter:
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches
Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone
Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.
own goal left, attacking →
04
Where Does He Receive?
The zones where Mamady Diambou gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
22%
Primary
Left Half-Space, Middle third
18%
Secondary
Central, Middle third
13%
Third
Left Wing, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
05
What is his passing profile?
77
passes attempted
39%
mostly forward
51%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
30 · 39%
Sideways
21 · 27%
Backward
26 · 34%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
36 · 51%
Medium
29 · 41%
Long (>30m)
6 · 8%
Progression3 sections
06
How does he progress play?
How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.
6
progressive · 3.3/90
8
final-third entries · 4.4/90
1
box entries · 0.56/90
13
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
07
Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted
His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.24
Central Att third → Central Att third
1 passes · 1 to a shot
0.18
Right Wing Mid third → Right Wing Att third
1 passes
0.17
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.16
Central Mid third → Left Half-Space Mid third
2 passes
0.03
Left Half-Space Att third → Left Wing Att third
1 passes
08
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the central in the final third — 1 passes worth 0.24 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the central in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the middle third: 30% of his 10 touches there are lost (3 times).
Carrying1 section
09
How dangerous are his carries?
Real ball-carries
15 tracked carries (8.3/90, 3 progressive, 137m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.
progressivelateral/short% of his 15 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 22m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
First (15)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →
Dribbles (1v1s)
Only 1 dribble attempted this season — too little volume to map a location pattern.
Chance creation1 section
10
How does he create chances?
1 key passes (0.56/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
When he loses it1 section
11
Where does he become vulnerable?
7 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.
0
attacking third (cheap)
4
middle third
3
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 0% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.90 danger-index/90 · 0.489 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
31 defensive actions across the season (17.2/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
8
tackles · 75% won
0
interceptions · 0.0/90
8
recoveries · 4.4/90
1
clearances · 0.6/90
1
blocks
50
avg action height
8
won high (att 3rd)
16
middle third
7
own third
Vision AI A front-foot / high defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 16 proactive ball-wins (8.9/90), tackle success 75%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Brest's output per match with Mamady Diambou (5 matches) versus without him (3 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 3 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (5)
WITHOUT (3)
Δ
goals for /match
2.20
1.00
+1.20
xG for /match
2.22
0.00
+2.22
goals against /match
1.60
1.33
+0.27
points /match
1.20
1.00
+0.20
14
His Share of the Team
Of everything Brest produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Mamady Diambou specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
shots
1%
6 / 421
tackles
1%
8 / 642
zone-14 entries
1%
2 / 207
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Mamady Diambou is a central mid: 3.3 progressive passes, 0.56 key passes /90, 1 box entries, 0 goals from 0.43 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.
Based on 5 matches (162 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a central mid — best used in a system built around that identity.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
