Thin sample this season. Rubén Sánchez has played 5 matches (214 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Right Wing, Middle third — wide or inverted — mostly in the middle third (54% of his 98 passes)
88% completion · 98× in 5/5 matches
↓
PROGRESS
carry or combine up the flank
5.5 prog/90 · 13× in 4/5 matches
↓
DRIBBLE
beat his man up the line
67% won · 6× in 3/5 matches
↓
DEFEND
1v1 and cover on his side
44 def actions · lost 35% deep · 44× in 5/5 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress → Dribble → Defend — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: deliver — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
18 tracked carries (7.6/90, 7 progressive, 198m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.
progressivelateral/short% of his 18 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 36m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
First (18)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →
Beaten in the tackle
How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).
4
tackle duels
2
won
2
beaten · 50%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 25%
OUTSIDE 75%
Tackle-duel location — 1 inside · 3 outside
Right Wing
3 · 75%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
1 · 25%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 2 of 4 tackle duels (50% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →
He attempted only 6 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.
03
How does he create chances?
1 key passes (0.42/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
04
Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone
Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Rubén Sánchez actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.
Filter:
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches
Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone
Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.
own goal left, attacking →
02
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the right wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 4 passes worth 0.53 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right wing toward the central in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 29% of his 14 touches there are lost (4 times).
44 defensive actions across the season (18.5/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
4
tackles · 50% won
3
interceptions · 1.3/90
13
recoveries · 5.5/90
9
clearances · 3.8/90
2
blocks
28
avg action height
2
won high (att 3rd)
16
middle third
26
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 20 proactive ball-wins (8.4/90), tackle success 50%. He defends deep, protecting his box — a last-line stopper.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Elche's output per match with Rubén Sánchez (5 matches) versus without him (5 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 5 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (5)
WITHOUT (5)
Δ
goals against /match
1.00
2.40
-1.40
points /match
1.20
0.80
+0.40
goals for /match
1.20
1.60
-0.40
xG for /match
0.78
0.98
-0.20
08
His Share of the Team
Of everything Elche produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Rubén Sánchez specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
8%
19 / 231
progressive passes
6%
95 / 1551
box entries
6%
23 / 404
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 232 full-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Overlapping full-back84%Inverted full-back43%
Why Overlapping full-back 84%: a weighted blend of transition 87 (weight 25%) + final-third threat 84 (weight 25%) + crossing 66 (weight 30%) + dribbling 84 (weight 20%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
defensive aggression, build-up, retention, territory (wide vs central)
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Through-balls ~proxy
98
Passing directness
94
Progression
87
Transition ~proxy
87
Line-breaking
86
Carrying
84
Dribbling
84
Final-third threat
84
Box threat
68
Crossing
66
Press resistance ~proxy
59
Receiving zones
52
Creativity
47
Ball-winning
45
Defensive aggression
36
Build-up
30
Retention
30
Territory (wide vs central)
15
10
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 185 cm / 73 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Dodô Fiorentina · Serie A · 166 cm / 68 kg
73%
Driven by: transition (19%), carrying (11%), dribbling (10%). Different mechanism — Sánchez more via through-balls, passing directness; Dodô more via creativity, receiving zones.
Andrei Ratiu Rayo Vallecano · 183 cm / 75 kg
69%
Driven by: transition (14%), through-balls (13%), carrying (12%). Different mechanism — Sánchez more via passing directness; Ratiu more via creativity, receiving zones.
Pedro Porro Tottenham · Premier League · 173 cm / 69 kg
68%
Driven by: through-balls (15%), final-third threat (15%), progression (14%). Different mechanism — Sánchez more via dribbling, press resistance; Porro more via territory (wide vs central), build-up.
Nordi Mukiele Sunderland · Premier League · 187 cm / 84 kg
68%
Driven by: transition (18%), passing directness (15%), through-balls (12%). Different mechanism — Sánchez more via dribbling, final-third threat; Mukiele more via defensive aggression, ball-winning.
Vladimír Coufal Hoffenheim · Bundesliga · 174 cm / 76 kg
67%
Driven by: through-balls (16%), final-third threat (12%), progression (12%). Different mechanism — Sánchez more via carrying, transition; Coufal more via territory (wide vs central), receiving zones.
Rasmus Kristensen Eintracht Frankfurt · Bundesliga 25/26 · 187 cm / 70 kg
67%
Driven by: transition (18%), progression (13%), through-balls (12%). Different mechanism — Kristensen more via defensive aggression, territory (wide vs central).
11
Summary
Rubén Sánchez is an overlapping full-back: 5.5 progressive passes and 1 box entries, delivering 1 key passes. Inverted full-back. [1v1 recovery pace and off-ball overlap timing need tracking.]
Based on 5 matches (214 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as an overlapping full-back — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is crossing — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall overlapping full-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.