العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026

Oscar Bobb

Fulham
Advanced playmaker AM
2.50 key passes/90 · 0.31 xT/90
Capability Analysis
Chance Creation47%vs 26 attacking mids
"Does he create real chances for others?"
Expected assists /900.07xA31%
Through balls /900.00%
Threat added by passing /900.9xT69%
Box entries (pass) /903.688%
Box Threat3%vs 26 attacking mids
"Is he a genuine goal threat by shot volume and quality?"
xG /900.13xG4%
Shots /901.224%
xGOT /900.09xGOT0%
Ball-Carrying48%vs 26 attacking mids
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /903.1212%
Carry distance /9083.72m15%
Successful take-ons /901.885%
Take-on success44.16%81%
attacking midhalf-space creatorcreationbetween the lines
575
minutes
8 apps
16
key passes
2.50/90
7
progressive passes
1.1/90
7
box entries
1.10/90
8
final-3rd entries
1.3/90
1
goals
1.07 xG
22
dribbles
32% won
78%
pass completion
226 passes
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Right Wing, Attacking third — between the lines — mostly in the attacking third (59% of his 226 passes)
78% completion · 226× in 8/8 matches
↓
TURN / BEAT MAN
face forward in the pocket
32% won · 22× in 8/8 matches
↓
CREATE
through-ball, cut-back, key pass
2.50/90 · 16× in 7/8 matches
↓
FINISH
arrive and shoot from central zones
1 goals · 1.07 xG · 11× in 5/8 matches
Signature: receive between the lines → turn → create or finish.
18

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
28
passes / match
2.8
dribbles / match
18–38
pass range (matches)
1–5
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (18 at the low end, 38 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

07

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

55 tracked carries (8.6/90, 13 progressive, 582m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

7%33%25%15%2%5%5%5%2%
progressivelateral/short% of his 55 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 9m, longest 29m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
15Outside → Inside
17Inside → Inside
21Outside → Outside
2Inside → Outside
First (22)Second (20)Third (7)Fourth (6)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Does he carry to create or drift wide? Dribbles by channel. Season rate: 3.44 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 55%
OUTSIDE 45%
Dribble location — 12 inside · 10 outside
Right Wing
10 · 45%
Right Half-Space
9 · 41%
Central
3 · 14%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI His carries cluster centrally — a central creator.
13

How does he build & move the ball?

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW10159%6030%3010%101%1RHS4721%1047%2228%134%2C176%16%129%547%812%2LHS850%450%4LW3100%3FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right wing in the final third → central areas in the final third — 8 progressive passes (24% of his progression) at 0.189 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 74% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 3% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 5% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 11 line-breaking passes and 8 final-third entries, 2.0 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
1%5%9%15%25%25%2%2%5%4%2%0%0%1%2%
completedincomplete226 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
226
passes
78%
completed
50
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 78% season completion rate.
02

How does he create chances?

16 key passes (2.50/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
21%57%7%7%7%
chance creation (14)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
from the left (3)from the right (11)of 14 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
10

Where does he become vulnerable?

65 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

47
attacking third (cheap)
9
middle third
9
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 72% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.76 danger-index/90 · 0.173 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
11

What is his passing profile?

226
passes attempted
38%
mostly sideways
66%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
54 · 24%
Sideways
87 · 38%
Backward
85 · 38%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
117 · 66%
Medium
55 · 31%
Long (>30m)
4 · 2%
05

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Oscar Bobb gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
36%
Primary
Right Wing, Attacking third
17%
Secondary
Right Wing, Middle third
16%
Third
Right Half-Space, Attacking third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
06

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Oscar Bobb actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
11355412121741222376064
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%5%9%15%25%25%2%2%5%4%2%0%0%1%2%
own goal left, attacking →
12

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

16Key pass
4Cross
9Cutback
7Progressive
19Long ball
3Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
41Outside → Inside
55Inside → Inside
63Outside → Outside
17Inside → Outside
By direction
54Forward
85Backward
87Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
04

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 16 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right hs toward the central in the final third — 6 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the final third: 33% of his 85 touches there are lost (28 times).
27%3/11 lost—3 touches · too few—3 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few8%3/39 lost9%2/22 lost0%0/9 lost—4 touches · too few—1 touch · too few33%28/85 lost27%9/33 lost30%3/10 lost—4 touches · too few—2 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
03

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 55 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he drives along the touchline (38%). He carries from outside into the middle 15 times and out toward the touchline 2 — a genuine inside forward who cuts in with the ball.
08

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
2 · 4%
Progressive / key pass
5 · 9%
Simple pass
39 · 71%
No clean link
9 · 16%
Of 55 carries, 4% flow straight into a shot of his own, 9% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 16% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
09

Crosses & Cutbacks

4 crosses (0.63/90, 2 completed) and 9 cutbacks (1.41/90, 7 completed) — two separate wide-delivery patterns into the box, each its own map with a completed/failed filter. Neither is a tagged event, so both are inferred from pass geometry — the intended end point of a failed attempt is still real data (an interception doesn’t erase where the ball was aimed): a cross is a pass aimed into the box starting from a wide channel; a cutback starts almost on the byline but is squared back rather than driven forward, aimed centrally around the box. The completed-cross count was checked against this platform’s own real match-level cross totals and lands within about 1 cross of the true count.

Crosses — close-up on the final third
Cutbacks — close-up on the final third
completedfailed (dashed)close-up on the box — attacking ↑ toward goal
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

15

How & where does he defend?

74 defensive actions across the season (11.6/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
11
tackles · 27% won
5
interceptions · 0.8/90
25
recoveries · 3.9/90
2
clearances · 0.3/90
8
blocks
43
avg action height
15
won high (att 3rd)
26
middle third
33
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 41 proactive ball-wins (6.4/90), tackle success 27%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

28
attacking-half actions · 4.38/90
14

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Oscar Bobb keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 4.5, 2m)
0.70
1.3
1.97
17%
Mid press (PPDA 6.1, 2m)
0.65
1.4
1.35
17%
Low press (PPDA 8.2, 4m)
1.13
0.9
3.25
50%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

16

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Oscar Bobb played nearly every Fulham match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

17

His Share of the Team

Of everything Fulham produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Oscar Bobb specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
goals
14%
1 / 7
successful take-ons
12%
34 / 272
box entries
12%
68 / 556
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

19

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 247 attacking mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Half-space creator56%Advanced playmaker (8)56%
Why Half-space creator 56%: a weighted blend of creativity 52 (weight 40%) + final-third threat 64 (weight 30%) + dribbling 82 (weight 15%) + box threat 31 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
crossing, line-breaking, through-balls
Strong
retention, dribbling, territory (wide vs central), press resistance, ball-winning
Average
progression, final-third threat, defensive aggression, receiving zones, build-up, creativity
Weak
carrying, box threat, transition, passing directness
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Crossing
87
Line-breaking
86
Through-balls ~proxy
86
Retention
83
Dribbling
82
Territory (wide vs central)
81
Press resistance ~proxy
81
Ball-winning
77
Progression
69
Final-third threat
64
Defensive aggression
62
Receiving zones
58
Build-up
56
Creativity
52
Carrying
34
Box threat
31
Transition ~proxy
24
Passing directness
8
20

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 175 cm / 72 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Germán Valera Elche · La Liga · 170 cm / 68 kg
70%
Driven by: crossing (19%), territory (wide vs central) (13%), passing directness (12%). Different mechanism — Bobb more via dribbling, defensive aggression; Valera more via carrying.
Yeremay Hernández Deportivo · La Liga · 170 cm / 61 kg
67%
Driven by: press resistance (18%), ball-winning (17%), crossing (16%). Different mechanism — Bobb more via territory (wide vs central), through-balls; Hernández more via box threat, transition.
Yáser Asprilla Girona · La Liga 25/26 · 177 cm / 75 kg
63%
Driven by: through-balls (18%), line-breaking (15%), dribbling (13%). Different mechanism — Bobb more via defensive aggression, retention; Asprilla more via passing directness, box threat.
Aleksandr Golovin Monaco · Ligue 1 · 178 cm / 69 kg
60%
Driven by: press resistance (15%), crossing (13%), ball-winning (13%). Different mechanism — Bobb more via territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression; Golovin more via passing directness, receiving zones.
Amine Harit Marseille · Ligue 1 · 180 cm / 67 kg
56%
Driven by: press resistance (15%), dribbling (12%), through-balls (12%). Different mechanism — Bobb more via territory (wide vs central), crossing; Harit more via carrying, transition.
Florian Wirtz Liverpool · 176 cm / 73 kg
56%
Driven by: crossing (20%), press resistance (12%), retention (12%). Different mechanism — Bobb more via territory (wide vs central); Wirtz more via passing directness, box threat.
21

Summary

Oscar Bobb is a half-space creator / advanced playmaker (8): 2.50 key passes /90, 1.1 progressive passes, 1 goals from 1.07 xG. A between-the-lines creator. [Off-ball movement into pockets needs tracking.]

Based on 8 matches (575 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a half-space creator / advanced playmaker (8) — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is box threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall half-space creator profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report