Thin sample this season. Jacques Ekomié has played 1 match (94 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Left Wing, Middle third — wide or inverted — mostly in the middle third (52% of his 40 passes)
75% completion · 40× in 1/1 matches
↓
PROGRESS
carry or combine up the flank
1.9 prog/90 · 2× in 1/1 matches
↓
DRIBBLE
beat his man up the line
50% won · 2× in 1/1 matches
↓
DEFEND
1v1 and cover on his side
14 def actions · lost 18% deep · 14× in 1/1 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress → Dribble → Defend — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: deliver — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession
In possession
What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
0 key passes (0.00/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.
Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
chance creation (0)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
03
Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks
Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.
own goal left, attacking →
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the final third: 25% of his 12 touches there are lost (3 times).
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Angers's output per match with Jacques Ekomié (1 matches) versus without him (7 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 7 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (1)
WITHOUT (7)
Δ
goals against /match
2.00
1.86
+0.14
points /match
0.00
1.14
-1.14
goals for /match
0.00
1.29
-1.29
xG for /match
1.94
0.00
+1.94
05
His Share of the Team
Of everything Angers produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Jacques Ekomié specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
tackles
13%
63 / 483
interceptions
11%
33 / 293
successful take-ons
10%
15 / 144
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 232 full-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Overlapping full-back24%Inverted full-back20%
Why Overlapping full-back 24%: a weighted blend of dribbling 56 (weight 20%) + transition 42 (weight 25%) + crossing 27 (weight 30%) + final-third threat 9 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Territory (wide vs central)
84
Defensive aggression
78
Ball-winning
70
Dribbling
56
Carrying
47
Press resistance ~proxy
43
Transition ~proxy
42
Box threat
41
Passing directness
31
Retention
30
Build-up
28
Crossing
27
Creativity
23
Through-balls ~proxy
20
Progression
18
Receiving zones
13
Line-breaking
12
Final-third threat
9
07
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 179 cm / 74 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Giacomo Quagliata Deportivo · La Liga · 180 cm / 69 kg
76%
Driven by: build-up (15%), territory (wide vs central) (14%), final-third threat (12%). Different mechanism — Ekomié more via ball-winning, passing directness; Quagliata more via receiving zones, crossing.
Daouda Guindo Brest 25/26 · 183 cm / 68 kg
73%
Driven by: final-third threat (20%), creativity (15%), receiving zones (12%). Different mechanism — Ekomié more via carrying, defensive aggression; Guindo more via line-breaking.
Iñigo Arguibide Osasuna · La Liga · 178 cm / 70 kg
72%
Driven by: final-third threat (15%), receiving zones (11%), line-breaking (10%). Different mechanism — Ekomié more via ball-winning, defensive aggression.
Davinchi Getafe · La Liga · 182 cm / 73 kg
67%
Driven by: creativity (12%), build-up (12%), defensive aggression (11%). Different mechanism — Ekomié more via carrying, ball-winning; Davinchi more via passing directness, through-balls.
Jon Aramburu Real Sociedad · La Liga · 176 cm / 71 kg
67%
Driven by: creativity (13%), defensive aggression (11%), crossing (11%). Different mechanism — Ekomié more via carrying, dribbling; Aramburu more via passing directness, final-third threat.
Lukas Ullrich Borussia Monchengladbach · Bundesliga · 178 cm / 69 kg
67%
Driven by: progression (15%), final-third threat (15%), creativity (12%). Different mechanism — Ekomié more via defensive aggression, carrying; Ullrich more via through-balls, box threat.
08
Summary
Jacques Ekomié is an overlapping full-back: 1.9 progressive passes and 0 box entries, delivering 0 key passes. Inverted full-back. [1v1 recovery pace and off-ball overlap timing need tracking.]
Based on 1 matches (94 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as an overlapping full-back — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is final-third threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall overlapping full-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
← BACK TO SEARCH
