Thin sample this season. Louis Mouton has played 3 matches (77 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Central, Middle third — mostly in the middle third (62% of his 29 passes)
76% completion · 29× in 3/3 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive or pass into the final third
2.3 prog/90 · 2× in 2/3 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 4 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: arrive — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); create / finish — 2× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Angers's output per match with Louis Mouton (3 matches) versus without him (5 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 5 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (3)
WITHOUT (5)
Δ
goals for /match
1.00
1.20
-0.20
xG for /match
1.18
0.09
+1.09
goals against /match
3.33
1.00
+2.33
points /match
0.33
1.40
-1.07
03
His Share of the Team
Of everything Angers produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Louis Mouton specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
zone-14 entries
13%
16 / 127
shots
12%
37 / 314
expected goals (xG)
10%
2.9 / 29.8
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 383 central mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Why Transition runner 46%: a weighted blend of defensive aggression 65 (weight 30%) + box threat 67 (weight 25%) + transition 28 (weight 45%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
—
Strong
—
Average
box threat, defensive aggression, creativity, passing directness, territory (wide vs central), line-breaking, receiving zones
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Box threat
67
Defensive aggression
65
Creativity
55
Passing directness
50
Territory (wide vs central)
45
Line-breaking
44
Receiving zones
43
Build-up
38
Dribbling
37
Ball-winning
36
Through-balls ~proxy
36
Crossing
32
Press resistance ~proxy
31
Progression
29
Transition ~proxy
28
Final-third threat
23
Carrying
22
Retention
19
05
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 180 cm / 75 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Giovanni Fabbian Parma Calcio 1913 · Serie A · 186 cm / 75 kg
87%
Driven by: crossing (15%), final-third threat (11%), carrying (10%). Different mechanism — Mouton more via line-breaking, through-balls.
El Bilal Touré Parma Calcio 1913 · Serie A · 185 cm / 77 kg
86%
Driven by: retention (13%), final-third threat (11%), press resistance (10%). Different mechanism — Mouton more via creativity, build-up.
Junior Dina Ebimbe Schalke · Bundesliga · 183 cm / 80 kg
84%
Driven by: final-third threat (14%), carrying (13%), transition (12%). Different mechanism — Mouton more via line-breaking, passing directness; Ebimbe more via defensive aggression.
Marshall Munetsi Wolves 25/26 · 188 cm / 83 kg
82%
Driven by: retention (11%), carrying (11%), final-third threat (11%). Different mechanism — Mouton more via line-breaking, creativity; Munetsi more via passing directness.
Mattias Svanberg Wolfsburg · Bundesliga 25/26 · 186 cm / 77 kg
81%
Driven by: crossing (13%), retention (12%), carrying (11%). Different mechanism — Mouton more via creativity, line-breaking; Svanberg more via passing directness.
Mario Martín Getafe · La Liga · 178 cm / 74 kg
81%
Driven by: retention (13%), final-third threat (12%), press resistance (11%). Different mechanism — Mouton more via creativity, line-breaking; Martín more via defensive aggression.
06
Summary
Louis Mouton is a transition runner: 2.3 progressive passes, 1.17 key passes /90, 0 box entries, 0 goals from 0.10 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.
Based on 3 matches (77 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a transition runner — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is transition — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall transition runner profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
← BACK TO SEARCH
